The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Can anyone explain the $2.4B Big Ten PE deal? Why would B10 agree?
| Dashing low-t pit gaming laptop | 11/10/25 |
| Dashing low-t pit gaming laptop | 11/10/25 |
| navy yapping new version fanboi | 11/10/25 |
| Dashing low-t pit gaming laptop | 11/10/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 10th, 2025 4:07 PM Author: Dashing low-t pit gaming laptop B10 would get $2.4B. PE would get 10% of the B10's athletics revenue going forward and presumably excercise some control. Schools would be locked into the conference until 2046.
Seems like a terrible, terrible deal for a conference that makes $1B+ per year on football TV rights alone.
It has something to do with rolling up the schools' collective athletics IP into an entity to monetize it, but you don't need to get in bed with PE to do that. So what gives? What's the upsisde for these schools? |
Date: November 10th, 2025 4:45 PM Author: Dashing low-t pit gaming laptop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795816&forum_id=2)#49418098) |
|
Date: November 10th, 2025 4:56 PM Author: navy yapping new version fanboi i dont understand what its even supposed to be. isn't the big ten just a conference of schools who play sports with each other. how can you "sell" that to private equity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795816&forum_id=2)#49418138) |
 |
Date: November 10th, 2025 5:21 PM Author: Dashing low-t pit gaming laptop I think they're selling the right to 10% of the revenue from monetizing those sports (TV rights, gear sales) to PE. But why? Who benefits? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795816&forum_id=2)#49418191) |