The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Thinking AI "isn't intelligent" is an almost certain indicator of an IQ below 85
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:06 AM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) But likely far lower (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184330) |
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:10 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. Thanks to AI I finally intuitively understand relativity. Not just “this is what relativity says is true” but now I get WHY it’s true and can answer questions about “what if observer A is doing X and observer B is doing Y?” It’s like having my own personal tutor tailored to my specific brand of retardation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184341) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:12 AM Author: guy doing interesting things online Oh yeah? Explain the pole barn paradox no cheating (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184346) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:23 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. that’s just a rebranded version of penrose’s andromeda paradox to illustrate length contraction rather than time dilation. the pole, which is longer than the barn when at rest in the same frame as the barn, is in motion moving towards the barn. from the barn’s perspective the pole’s motion contracts the geometry of spacetime in the direction of the pole’s motion thereby causing the pole to become short enough to fit inside the barn. but from the pole’s perspective the BARN is in motion and IT is length contracted making it too short for it to ever be large enough for the pole to fit inside it. both things are true. the resolution is relatively of simultaneity which means from barn’s perspective there actually is a moment that the pole would fit inside the barn, and from the pole’s perspective there is no point at which it ever could fit inside the barn. the kicker is that things don’t just APPEAR this way from each observer’s perspective, but rather its a true statement about the nature of reality actually being different for each observer. pass? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184414) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:31 AM Author: guy doing interesting things online For some reason time dilation didn't take me that long to grasp but length contraction and specifically the barn paradox I struggled with a lot more. Even though they're the same thing, since they're necessary to explain each other (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184462) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:35 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. ive noticed that the thing length contraction examples tend to leave out or not explain very well is that it isn’t just the length of the object in motion that contracts, but also the length of spacetime itself in the direction of the moving object’s motion infinitely in both directions (in front AND behind) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184479) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:04 PM Author: guy doing interesting things online Yeah, cr. Good insight. I think the spatial aspect of it is what was more difficult for me. Since we are actually (trying to) model a physical picture of spatial contraction in our heads, whereas time dilation is logically abstracted (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184631) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) What about cunt dilation? I remember back in the day Julia famously said vaginas are elastic. But now you can have AI diagram it as a degenerate sheaf with failed gluing conditions after local sections can no longer cohere due to catastrophic trauma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184711) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:35 PM Author: guy doing interesting things online Women aren't like that. Babies get delivered by storks
Trust me. I know these things. |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:41 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) Doesn't preclude the existence of blown out twats (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184747) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:12 AM Author: Ass Sunstein below 85 and over 145 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184348) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:27 AM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) Below 85 and over 160. AI is too far above 145 and 145 should be aware enough to know its much smarter than you. I remember reading a study months ago that o3 was tested to be equal to a 160 iq human, and Elon Musk has stated Grok 4 maxes out the GRE general every time without having seen the questions and all of the subject tests too. LOL at 145 (or any human) doing that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184434) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:00 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., rofl no. AI cant do biglaw work anywhere as well as a 120 IQ fordham law review striver (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184617) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:10 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) But law is not based on “intelligence” it’s all feels based tribal political bs made up by chimps. When you say “this law brief is good” you just mean it looks like it was written by a well groomed chimp who grew up UMC and attended Harvard. Has nothing to do with ability to do category theory and write advanced code. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184654) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:19 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., so intelligent, yet cant do work of well groomed chimps. odd case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184684) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:23 PM Author: He flexed his right muscle. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184691) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:24 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) Yes so odd that a machine which can simulate turbulent plasma and optimize quantum topologies in 11 dimensions isn’t calibrated to file a motion to dismiss in the exact cadence of a Dartmouth legacy with a bar membership and a dad who owns a lake (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184694) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: Nothing Ever Happens (🧐) MYELOMA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184709) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:36 PM Author: theranchman you are so absurdly dumb it's hard to believe even your jew-cohort can find an excuse to pay you six figures for work product (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184730) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:37 PM Author: jew hater law is just a grift for mentally retarded jews to steal everyone’s time and money (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184734) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:41 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184745) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:05 PM Author: jew hater I hate you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184824) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:22 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) figured that much (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184877) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:22 PM Author: jew hater you’re a retarded kike (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184883) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) well, yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184908) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: artificial intelligence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184849) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:24 AM Author: jew hater My IQ is 150 and I think this
Also aren’t you the one with retarded nigger kids? |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:37 AM Author: Candy Ride I was a huge AI doubter until I tried chatgpt. Before I had just tried Lexis's and Westlaw's and they were absolutely useless. Now I am finally coming around. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184494) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 11:47 AM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) If you were a doubter at gpt 2 that’s understandable that thing was garbage. But GPT 5 hell no. Only thing it needs to improve is writing fluency. But the limits now are probably caused by compute limits and guardrails. When o1 first came out I remember it being better at writing others have said the same. 4.5 too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184557) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 12:44 PM Author: boltzmann penises it obviously depends on what you mean by “intelligent.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184766) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:18 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK If you don't know what maximum likelihood estimation is you don't know shit about AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184863) |
|
Date: August 14th, 2025 1:31 PM Author: The Wandering Mercatores (from the Euphrates to the Forum) If you consider "knowing about AI" knowing about how to train models then sure. But there are people who "know about AI" that don't know how to use pytorch. Someone who is high iq and uses it all day long definitely knows stuff about AI regardless if they understand loss functions and optimization (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762360&forum_id=2)#49184906) |