https://www.unz.com/isteve/obamas-lsat-score/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44072085)

On Jackson, 165.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44072233)

that cross-examination adage about asking q's you don't know the answer to?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44072183)

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Barrett%20SJQ(PUBLIC).pdf

Maybe she thought the Jesuits were too liberal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44077950)

First of all, you have no evidence that that was why she did the district clerkship. She was happy to leave Boston for the SCOTUS clerkship. Is it just a coincidence that not a single current justice did a district clerkship?

Second, we have independent confirmation of Barrett being high-IQ: a guy who checked every box (1st in the class at HUG, Rhodes Scholar, YLS, SCOTUS clerk, HLS professor) describes her as being smarter than him and almost every other clerk that year: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-09-26/amy-coney-barrett-deserves-to-be-on-the-supreme-court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44080482)

https://www.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesis_1-251.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44080590)

the only good benchmark of intellectual horsepower among law students should be 1L grades. and i say that as someone who gamed the system to get MCL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44096129)

- she looks 99% nigga with no admixture at all

Weighing for her:

- dad was lolyer, mom was principal, sounds like she grew up UMC and went to good HS. Unlikely she was exposed to ghetto niggerdom

- her middle name is Onyika, is she part or all Nigerian? If so then this wld be a huge positive

Based on her simply looking like a total nigga I'd say she got a 155, but if she is part Nigerian then bump that into low 160's

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44074929)

https://forebears.io/surnames/onyika

need scholarship on whether its from that one group (igboo?) who are not total NIGGAS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44074937)

“Her father, Johnny Brown, was a lawyer who ultimately became the chief attorney for the Miami-Dade County School Board; her mother, Ellery, served as school principal at New World School of the Arts.[10][11] While she was in college, Jackson's uncle was sentenced to life in prison for a nonviolent cocaine conviction.”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44077785)

You: Poast about her LSAT on xoxo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44075020)

170s-- cons who asked the question are pwned. A bunch of editorials asking what other SCOTUS justices got on the LSAT. Chances are someone got lower. Oh shit!

160s-- a combo between the two outcomes above

AND the public at large doesn't know what these scores mean anyway! Just no upside whatsoever. And, again, who cares. It means a lot to this bort but in the real world it NEVER comes up again once you get into law school.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44075231)

instead just remind everyone that she's BLACK and therefore has the mental capacity of a forklift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44075200)

She also married her husband (from Boston) during her first clerkship so makes sense she wanted to be there for two years (looks like he did his residency at Mass General). She went to Goodwin Proctor Boston after SCOTUS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44076529)

really retarded not xo retarded

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44096198)

edit: she did three clerkships: district court, 1st circuit and SCOTUS. LJL at this idiot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44145241)

You: Poast on xoxo about the fact that she did a district court clerkship rather than a COA clerkship before she CLERKED FOR FUCKING SCOTUS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44096677)

Strawman. We are not arguing over whether she has an IQ over 110 or whatever, we are arguing over she has the very high intelligence necessary to be a reasonable pick for SCOTUS. Obviously most blacks cannot get a SCOTUS clerkship, but getting a SCOTUS clerkship while black is nowhere near as hard as getting one while non-black.

As has been pointed out elsewhere ITT, AA means that accomplishments such as being a SCOTUS clerk do not prove high IQ the way they would for somewhere without black/Hispanic privilege. Sotomayor is dumb as shit and managed to become not merely a SCOTUS clerk, but a fucking SCOTUS justice. Are you bluesmoke or something? Go back to reddit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44099881)

lolwat

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44099904)

Please leave me alone and stop talking about me. I don't even post anymore, I haven't been a reg in years - you'd think this would be enough to get me off your mind and yet whenever I post or lurk I see you posting about me.

Just stop please. TYIA

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44145169)

You’re clearly a retarded AA nigger

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44099930)

1 day ago

I don't give a damn what Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson scored on her LSAT 25 years ago+. That is literally the furthest thing from my mind. I litigate cases. I try cases. I interact with judges all the time. I've been in front of 100+ judges. The idea that Judge Jackson's LSAT score matters at this point in her career is ABSOLUTE nonsense. You know what else I don't care about? Where she went to law school or her first job after graduating.

What matters to me:

Does she display a strong grasp of the law? And does she apply the law, rather than rule based on her own personal views.

Is she truly fair and impartial?

Does she treat EVERY SINGLE litigant who appears in front of her with the EXACT SAME level of respect? That mean she treats a factory worker making $12 an hour and trying to represent himself with the SAME LEVEL of respect as she treats Apple, Google, celebrities, big time politicians.

Does she apply rules and procedures consistently?

Does she act like she's a supreme being--- or, does she conduct herself with grace and humility?

Is she open-minded and willing to listen to new or different arguments and perspectives?

Does she hire outstanding law clerks?

Does she want to do the work of a federal judge (now possible Supreme Court Justice), or, does she just want the title and the prestige---- but regards doing the actual had work as an inconvenience?

Is she willing to rule on hard issues?

Can she build consensus with other judges?

I could keep going. I could list 50+ different factors and considerations. You know what would never show up on that list? Her LSAT score.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44099804)

Can't stand his long winded posts.

Everyone I knew was sharing or liking his "updates."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5047542&forum_id=2)#44099874)