So will Obama be forced to resign over this Benghazi stuff or no
| chrome excitant idea he suggested | 05/10/13 | | Ungodly Aggressive Yarmulke | 05/10/13 | | Ebony Corner Pozpig | 05/10/13 | | Poppy bawdyhouse | 05/10/13 | | Plum Box Office | 05/10/13 | | Plum Box Office | 05/10/13 | | Pink motley newt | 05/10/13 | | chrome excitant idea he suggested | 05/10/13 | | Pink motley newt | 05/10/13 | | Geriatric theater stage | 05/10/13 | | Big Pontificating Chad | 05/11/13 | | titillating space | 05/10/13 | | claret swashbuckling pisswyrm indirect expression | 05/10/13 | | erotic ladyboy cuckoldry | 05/10/13 | | histrionic property | 05/10/13 | | sadistic nursing home electric furnace | 05/10/13 | | bistre diverse marketing idea | 05/10/13 | | Geriatric theater stage | 05/10/13 | | Startling state | 05/10/13 | | bronze rambunctious shrine | 07/14/13 | | bronze rambunctious shrine | 07/14/13 | | lfo | 12/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:26 PM Author: Ebony Corner Pozpig
Its just the right wing hype machine, but it would be pretty lolzy if the House impeached him. obviously no way the senate convicts, but it would be great for the lulz.
sadly John Boehner is no Newton Leroy Gingrich, so this won't happen.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2)#23172141) |
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:31 PM Author: Poppy bawdyhouse
no idea but this is the title of the article on the front of foxnews.com:
AP/Reuters
"Newly released emails are raising additional questions about the Obama administration's story-line on the Benghazi attack, showing top-level efforts to downplay terrorism ahead of public statements by UN Ambassador Susan Rice."
assuming this is true, i think it's just sort of a big "so what".
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2)#23172153)
|
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:51 PM Author: Plum Box Office
Love the idiot-liberal Google+ comments on the story:
"I agree totally with you, +Joshua Deighan The problem is that the USA has a history of, and believes in, adversarial justice, which by definition means that SOMEONE must bear the blame, irrespective of facts. Once a "blame" target has been identified, then the looney-tunes from BOTH sides have a "valid" argument (in their minds) of why "X" (the blame) is lousy for America, or his/her political party, or why all OTHER bad things can be attributed to him/her/it."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2)#23172257) |
|
|