Uber launches “no incel drivers” feature for women
| appetizing maniacal affirmative action | 07/23/25 | | Boyish really tough guy hairy legs | 07/23/25 | | appetizing maniacal affirmative action | 07/23/25 | | Azure Big-titted Meetinghouse | 07/23/25 | | Territorial business firm candlestick maker | 07/23/25 | | Sticky vivacious space ape | 07/23/25 | | Heady bistre parlor | 07/23/25 | | Violet Judgmental Gay Wizard Fortuitous Meteor | 07/23/25 | | exhilarant bat shit crazy site karate | 07/23/25 | | Violet Judgmental Gay Wizard Fortuitous Meteor | 07/23/25 | | Sooty cowardly den | 07/23/25 | | Violet Judgmental Gay Wizard Fortuitous Meteor | 07/23/25 | | Sooty cowardly den | 07/23/25 | | Violet Judgmental Gay Wizard Fortuitous Meteor | 07/23/25 | | Navy Stimulating Church | 07/23/25 | | appetizing maniacal affirmative action | 07/23/25 | | Irradiated hateful ladyboy | 07/23/25 | | contagious dog poop trust fund | 07/23/25 | | Judas Jones | 07/23/25 | | costumed pink hunting ground | 07/23/25 | | appetizing maniacal affirmative action | 07/23/25 | | Carnelian potus | 07/23/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/23/25 | | chilmata | 07/24/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/24/25 | | Buff electric old irish cottage therapy | 07/23/25 | | Talented coral native | 07/23/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/23/25 | | trip slimy school clown | 07/23/25 | | Chartreuse sandwich scourge upon the earth | 07/23/25 | | UhOh | 07/23/25 | | pitbulls eating your face in hell forever tp | 07/24/25 | | Laughsome Sadistic Lettuce Trump Supporter | 07/23/25 | | appetizing maniacal affirmative action | 07/23/25 | | '"''"''''''''"""'" | 07/24/25 | | UhOh | 07/24/25 | | Post nut horror | 07/24/25 | | place feels done | 07/24/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: July 23rd, 2025 5:15 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
I didn't think about that angle as well, but given that male drivers currently earn significantly more than female drivers, I think that case is harder to argue. But it will be interesting. My understanding is that the reason that male drivers earn more is because the best time to drive for Uber is when the bars close, and female drivers don't want to let a bunch of drunk randos into their cars. If female drivers suddenly start earning significantly more than their male counterparts once this change goes into effect, the male drivers might have a case.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2)#49125538) |
 |
Date: July 24th, 2025 1:48 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
I was just trying to figure out who would have standing to sue Uber, dumbass. I could more easily imagine a scenario where a male passenger suffers damages because a female driver refuses to pick him up. Given that male drivers already earn significantly more on Uber, it would be hard to show that a male driver suffered damages because a few female passengers didn't want him to pick them up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2)#49127686) |
 |
Date: July 23rd, 2025 5:17 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but my understanding is that gender-based laws get intermediate scrutiny rather than strict scrutiny for laws based on race. And when you consider the fact that female Uber drivers earn significantly less than male drivers and most of that is explained by the fact that they are scared to let random drunk guys into their cars when the bars close, I think there is a good chance that this type of policy would survive intermediate scrutiny.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2)#49125543) |
|
|