\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

GO ON THE RECORD: WILL EPSTEIN FILES BE RELEASED? BAD FOR TRUMP?

responses will be tallied. go on the record if you're not a ...
walnut home
  07/31/25
Release - Neutral. 60% chance some amount of them are releas...
vibrant gay son of senegal
  07/31/25
this is exactly how i feel but im going to put myself down a...
walnut home
  07/31/25
this. like all DC scandals, the coverup is 3X worse than the...
Bearded frozen headpube
  07/31/25
My guess there probably isn't some trove of un released file...
aquamarine soul-stirring ladyboy
  07/31/25
i don't think anyone but kooks think the government is withh...
walnut home
  07/31/25
Release neutral, though I’m sure there’s racy st...
light stage fat ankles
  07/31/25
this. ZOG would never let their shabbos goyim be completely ...
misunderstood pocket flask scourge upon the earth
  07/31/25
of course not, they are being covered up and this has been c...
Exhilarant theater stage cumskin
  07/31/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 9:44 AM
Author: walnut home

responses will be tallied. go on the record if you're not a fucking pussy scared to be wrong on xoxo. valid responses:

RELEASED-BAD: the files will be releasd during the trump administraton and it seems they were withheld because they are embarassing to trump personally.

RELEASED-NEUTRAL: the files will be releasd during the trump administraton and it doesn't seem they were withheld because they are embarassing to trump personally. this includes things like people close to trump being implicated.

NOT RELEASED

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145080)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 9:52 AM
Author: vibrant gay son of senegal

Release - Neutral. 60% chance some amount of them are released during the Trump admin and will contain some mentions of Trump, but nothing too damaging (like Trump fucking teenagers)—though that will not stop libs from trying to claim they are bad. Think about it: the Obama and Biden DOJs had access to this info for years. Don’t you think they would have leaked them during either Trump campaign if they were actually damaging to Trump? Also, Trump’s falling out with Epstein was in 2004–four years before Epstein was convicted. I’m guessing if anything, the Epstein files will make people like Bill Gates (who continued to socialize with him after his conviction) look awful, and that most of them are dems.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145099)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: walnut home

this is exactly how i feel but im going to put myself down as RELEASE-BAD because i think trump would be seen as avoiding bad optics. it's like the wsj birthday note, he probably ssnt it and it means nothing but he still denies it. he still denies stuff like stormy daniels too which definitely happened. i dont think teflon don will face and consequences and i dont think he fucked and underage sex workers. he seems like a thrill of the hunt guy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145158)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 1:44 PM
Author: Bearded frozen headpube

this. like all DC scandals, the coverup is 3X worse than the crime

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145664)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 9:54 AM
Author: aquamarine soul-stirring ladyboy

My guess there probably isn't some trove of un released files to begin with. There are no incriminating videos and nothing that could conclusively tie anyone of prominence to wrong doing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145105)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 10:33 AM
Author: walnut home

i don't think anyone but kooks think the government is withholding smoking gun stuff. why would they retain it and catalog it instead of just destroy it? i think it's more about avoiding suspicion via guilt by association. or other non-criminal yet repution damaging stuff like having reason to suspect epstein was a pedo and not saying anything.

i dont even think most of epsteins visitors did unethical sex shit. he was a well connected rich guy with a private island. those types host people all the time. if one of your colleagues got caught doing weird sex shit people wouldnt automatically think you were linked just because you went to some parties he hosted

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145189)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 11:45 AM
Author: light stage fat ankles

Release neutral, though I’m sure there’s racy stuff in there that embarrasses trump. But nothing that will move the needle and nothing that would support a crim indictment.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145335)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 11:57 AM
Author: misunderstood pocket flask scourge upon the earth

this. ZOG would never let their shabbos goyim be completely destroyed by Operation Epstein

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145366)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 31st, 2025 1:49 PM
Author: Exhilarant theater stage cumskin

of course not, they are being covered up and this has been clear from the start, nobody is going against the IC

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756638&forum_id=2)#49145688)