John Locke made a good point about King David
| dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | Sickened internet-worthy ticket booth | 10/31/25 | | ruby temple | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | Violet drunken site sound barrier | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 10/31/25 | | Violet drunken site sound barrier | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | Domesticated Old Irish Cottage | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | Violet drunken site sound barrier | 10/31/25 | | Domesticated Old Irish Cottage | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 10/31/25 | | Violet drunken site sound barrier | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 11/01/25 | | Ebony cruise ship | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 10/31/25 | | Naked histrionic native regret | 10/31/25 | | salmon market | 10/31/25 | | Naked histrionic native regret | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | dashing amber whorehouse | 10/31/25 | | canary rough-skinned spot | 10/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 31st, 2025 5:41 PM Author: dashing amber whorehouse
Jews went for centuries without a king, then boom! God gave them a king. But the king still had to earn it.
Both the prolonged absences of a king and the fact that David had to earn his title are offered as evidence against the divine right of kings. Pretty powerful stuff.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5792139&forum_id=2)#49391416) |
Date: October 31st, 2025 9:06 PM Author: Violet drunken site sound barrier
God went on a giant rant in the bible about how they shouldn't appoint a king, it was a terrible idea, and they were fools to consider it.
as usual, the heebs ignored Him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5792139&forum_id=2)#49391768)
|
 |
Date: October 31st, 2025 9:12 PM Author: dashing amber whorehouse
Yeah Locke is saying kinghood isn't something you can just inherit from Adam. That's what these kings were claiming. They said "Adam was an absolute monarch, and so were Adam's sons, and I can trace my lineage to one of Adam's sons."
Locke was saying hey look at King Fucking David. By the time he became King, he had all kinds of IRL achievements under his belt. He never said "I inherited this from God." So I don't think Locke's reading is orthogonal to yours at all.
Locke also psychoanalyzes God a bit. He says that at the time God was giving Adam "dominion" over certain things, he was pissed off and cursing Adam out, if anything. God certainly wasn't in the mood to do Adam any favors.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5792139&forum_id=2)#49391785) |
|
|