And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t re...	buff telephone internal respiration	05/26/26
yes	cerise floppy roommate juggernaut	05/26/26
It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LO...	buff telephone internal respiration	05/26/26
this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking ...	cerise floppy roommate juggernaut	05/26/26
The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can&...	buff telephone internal respiration	05/26/26
...	hilarious indirect expression dilemma	05/26/26
Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just pr...	Bipolar swashbuckling goyim school	05/26/26
People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but to...	buff telephone internal respiration	05/26/26
...	Bipolar swashbuckling goyim school	05/26/26
...	hilarious indirect expression dilemma	05/26/26

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:09 AM Author: buff telephone internal respiration And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t related are actually just different languages for describing the same thing. See actually what happened was the machine jusf statistically predicted the next token in a way that happened to be correct. It totally has no “understanding” of the math. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901513)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:13 AM Author: cerise floppy roommate juggernaut yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901516)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:19 AM Author: buff telephone internal respiration It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LOOKS like the machine converged on a genius answer but actually it was just a freak statistical accident. If you multiply probabilities across infinite time monkeys on a typewriter could probably do the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901522)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:22 AM Author: cerise floppy roommate juggernaut this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking the tv is a real person or time traveller or some shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901523)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:32 AM Author: buff telephone internal respiration The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can’t see the “person” inside the machine that it had to have come from statistical magic. The reality is that if “predicting the next token" results in a counterexample to an 80 year old conjecture that contradicts the intuition of Paul Erdos, then "token prediction" is functionally indistinguishable from "reasoning." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901537)

Date: May 26th, 2026 2:09 AM Author: hilarious indirect expression dilemma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901569)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:31 AM Author: Bipolar swashbuckling goyim school Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just predicts the next word" thing anymore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901535)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:33 AM Author: buff telephone internal respiration People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but tons of software engineers and Reddit midwits still do. It isn’t even totally wrong at a certain level of description anyway just reductive in a way that strips away almost everything actually important (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901541)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:35 AM Author: Bipolar swashbuckling goyim school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901545)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:16 AM Author: hilarious indirect expression dilemma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901521)