And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t re...	contagious geriatric ratface	05/26/26
yes	diverse elite kitchen place of business	05/26/26
It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LO...	contagious geriatric ratface	05/26/26
this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking ...	diverse elite kitchen place of business	05/26/26
The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can&...	contagious geriatric ratface	05/26/26
...	sepia concupiscible location candlestick maker	05/26/26
Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just pr...	Mind-boggling Boltzmann Boiling Water	05/26/26
People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but to...	contagious geriatric ratface	05/26/26
...	Mind-boggling Boltzmann Boiling Water	05/26/26
...	sepia concupiscible location candlestick maker	05/26/26

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:09 AM Author: contagious geriatric ratface And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t related are actually just different languages for describing the same thing. See actually what happened was the machine jusf statistically predicted the next token in a way that happened to be correct. It totally has no “understanding” of the math. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901513)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:13 AM Author: diverse elite kitchen place of business yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901516)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:19 AM Author: contagious geriatric ratface It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LOOKS like the machine converged on a genius answer but actually it was just a freak statistical accident. If you multiply probabilities across infinite time monkeys on a typewriter could probably do the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901522)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:22 AM Author: diverse elite kitchen place of business this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking the tv is a real person or time traveller or some shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901523)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:32 AM Author: contagious geriatric ratface The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can’t see the “person” inside the machine that it had to have come from statistical magic. The reality is that if “predicting the next token" results in a counterexample to an 80 year old conjecture that contradicts the intuition of Paul Erdos, then "token prediction" is functionally indistinguishable from "reasoning." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901537)

Date: May 26th, 2026 2:09 AM Author: sepia concupiscible location candlestick maker (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901569)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:31 AM Author: Mind-boggling Boltzmann Boiling Water Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just predicts the next word" thing anymore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901535)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:33 AM Author: contagious geriatric ratface People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but tons of software engineers and Reddit midwits still do. It isn’t even totally wrong at a certain level of description anyway just reductive in a way that strips away almost everything actually important (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901541)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:35 AM Author: Mind-boggling Boltzmann Boiling Water (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901545)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:16 AM Author: sepia concupiscible location candlestick maker (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901521)