And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t re...	Trip magical dragon	05/26/26
yes	fishy jew candlestick maker	05/26/26
It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LO...	Trip magical dragon	05/26/26
this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking ...	fishy jew candlestick maker	05/26/26
The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can&...	Trip magical dragon	05/26/26
...	alcoholic garnet indian lodge	05/26/26
Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just pr...	Provocative juggernaut shitlib	05/26/26
People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but to...	Trip magical dragon	05/26/26
...	Provocative juggernaut shitlib	05/26/26
...	alcoholic garnet indian lodge	05/26/26

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:09 AM Author: Trip magical dragon And showed that two subjects humans thought weren’t related are actually just different languages for describing the same thing. See actually what happened was the machine jusf statistically predicted the next token in a way that happened to be correct. It totally has no “understanding” of the math. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901513)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:13 AM Author: fishy jew candlestick maker yes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901516)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:19 AM Author: Trip magical dragon It’s Pure Coincidence. See from the outside it just LOOKS like the machine converged on a genius answer but actually it was just a freak statistical accident. If you multiply probabilities across infinite time monkeys on a typewriter could probably do the same. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901522)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:22 AM Author: fishy jew candlestick maker this is like showing a caveman a working tv and it thinking the tv is a real person or time traveller or some shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901523)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:32 AM Author: Trip magical dragon The caveman clutching the club thinks just because they can’t see the “person” inside the machine that it had to have come from statistical magic. The reality is that if “predicting the next token" results in a counterexample to an 80 year old conjecture that contradicts the intuition of Paul Erdos, then "token prediction" is functionally indistinguishable from "reasoning." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901537)

Date: May 26th, 2026 2:09 AM Author: alcoholic garnet indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901569)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:31 AM Author: Provocative juggernaut shitlib Not even people who make LLMs use the whole "it just predicts the next word" thing anymore (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901535)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:33 AM Author: Trip magical dragon People at the big labs and top researchers might not, but tons of software engineers and Reddit midwits still do. It isn’t even totally wrong at a certain level of description anyway just reductive in a way that strips away almost everything actually important (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901541)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:35 AM Author: Provocative juggernaut shitlib (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901545)

Date: May 26th, 2026 1:16 AM Author: alcoholic garnet indian lodge (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5869116&forum_id=2,#49901521)