The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| razzle personal credit line | 01/06/26 | | provocative nowag | 01/06/26 | | Histrionic famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | provocative nowag | 01/06/26 | | Histrionic famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | provocative nowag | 01/06/26 | | razzle personal credit line | 01/06/26 | | provocative nowag | 01/06/26 | | razzle personal credit line | 01/06/26 | | amethyst big cuck | 01/07/26 | | iridescent titillating indian lodge | 01/06/26 | | talented church | 01/06/26 | | Histrionic famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | maniacal dun theater | 01/06/26 | | Histrionic famous landscape painting | 01/06/26 | | Irradiated shrine | 01/06/26 | | vigorous ratface | 01/06/26 | | Gay dog poop chapel | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: provocative nowag
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2/#49568134) |
|
|