RESOLVED: if you prefer skinny women to thicc women, your gay
| federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | vivacious jewess | 12/12/25 | | Bearded theater | 12/12/25 | | cordovan laughsome locus knife | 12/12/25 | | godawful spruce marketing idea friendly grandma | 12/12/25 | | copper generalized bond pit | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | chocolate state | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | chocolate state | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | swollen vibrant office | 12/12/25 | | aphrodisiac round eye | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | chocolate state | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | copper generalized bond pit | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | copper generalized bond pit | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | sable space | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | sable space | 12/12/25 | | chocolate state | 12/12/25 | | indecent station faggot firefighter | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | copper generalized bond pit | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | cordovan laughsome locus knife | 12/12/25 | | Mauve pontificating piazza partner | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | disturbing coral school cafeteria | 12/12/25 | | Gaped Institution Brethren | 12/12/25 | | histrionic pungent chapel | 12/12/25 | | Mint lettuce theater stage | 12/12/25 | | vivacious jewess | 12/12/25 | | Razzle-dazzle Principal's Office Useless Brakes | 12/12/25 | | Elite low-t sanctuary reading party | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | swollen vibrant office | 12/12/25 | | walnut school feces | 12/12/25 | | mildly autistic haunted graveyard ceo | 12/12/25 | | provocative shivering den french chef | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | swollen vibrant office | 12/12/25 | | copper generalized bond pit | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | walnut school feces | 12/12/25 | | Embarrassed to the bone stirring national mother | 12/12/25 | | wonderful smoky roast beef university | 12/12/25 | | topaz thriller casino | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Fluffy twinkling selfie | 12/12/25 | | topaz thriller casino | 12/12/25 | | disturbing coral school cafeteria | 12/12/25 | | High-end infuriating home | 12/12/25 | | wonderful smoky roast beef university | 12/12/25 | | Embarrassed to the bone stirring national mother | 12/12/25 | | Embarrassed to the bone stirring national mother | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 | | Embarrassed to the bone stirring national mother | 12/12/25 | | wonderful smoky roast beef university | 12/12/25 | | federal wagecucks | 12/12/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:48 AM Author: Fluffy twinkling selfie
in 2025 BMI is more a metric for how responsible and diligent a woman is. white people mitigate their primal instincts with rationality. a dindu going off pure instinct would find #1 the most attractive, but a highly selective male in 2025 would see that this person is going to balloon to 250 after kids, be lazy, and cook a lot of meals with kraft cheese and heavy cream.
all that being said if you're not "attracted" to any of these women (except #2, which is pixar) you're a homosexual.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504316) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 5:56 PM Author: Mauve pontificating piazza partner
theres no soybean oil(or even canola) in kraft singles. its not in their regular mac and cheese either.
maybe youre thinking about velveeta or some less common kraft product.
kraft singles are far from an ideal food and obviously processed as hell but very unfairly shit on by people who dont know what theyre talking about
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49505399)
|
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:51 AM Author: federal wagecucks
no no no, see i know what you're trying to do here. this is what "men" who claim to "prefer" skinny "women" always try to do. they attempt to rationalize and abstract their preferences with ridiculous nonsense like "erm, but what i'm thinking is that a decade from now, this woman will be fatter or less attractive, therefore my brain is less/more attracted to her right now in this moment"
no. attraction is an animalistic, primal phenomenon. you either want to have sex with her, right now, or you don't. it's not an intellectual or abstract thing. we do not incorporate Reason into our sexual instincts
you can't fool me, buster
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504326) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:03 PM Author: Fluffy twinkling selfie
girl #1 is gonna smell like sweat and does not have the physical fitness to fuck good. girl #2 is going to be diligently manicured and have the energy and fitness of a cokehead because she is.
there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster.
i do agree #3 is too skinny and should eat a sandwich. but #1s thighs are touching all the way down to her knees.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504362) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:11 PM Author: federal wagecucks
you're still coming up with these goofy abstract rationalizations that have nothing to do with your actual biological attraction/non-attraction to these women. you're totally full of shit!
it's fascinating to me that men so often try to pretend like they rationalize their sexual attraction. it's such a womanly thing. women do this way more, of course, and it's just as bogus when they do it, and we men all recognize that it's bogus when they do it. but then for some reason, a lot of men do it too. i think it's just over-socialization: they want their stated preferences to meet the social consensus
men's revealed preference is for generally thicker women. you don't ever see skinny porn stars. they always have implants or naturally big tits and curvaceous thighs and asses. nobody is jerking off to twiggy chicks. because men who claim they're attracted to skinny women are full of shit
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504380) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:20 PM Author: Fluffy twinkling selfie
"there's a certainly a primal, unthinking component to it as well. and most men with both options on the table are gonna choose #3. sorry buster."
you conveniently skip over this part.
for as much as you lisp about my rationalizations i'm simply speculating on why most people would choose #3. but MOST PEOPLE WILL CHOOSE #3!
also, its a fucking preference, some will choose #1 of course. why can't you just accept that people have different primal preferences rather than insisting your POV is the correct one and everyone that says differently must be lying?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504404) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 12:30 PM Author: Fluffy twinkling selfie
i know i'm rolling with it.
i think you got it backwards, son. most people would fuck #3 and wife #1. #3 looks like a model whore, vapid, etc whereas #1 looks like she's already a mom.
this might have to do more with things outside their body type though. if #1 was gothed out and #3 was in a sundress maybe this would be reversed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504460) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:53 AM Author: disturbing coral school cafeteria
cr. OP is trying to mask his homosexuality with aggression and ideology.
just come out GaySuperstar
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504330)
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: topaz thriller casino
Brother... don't get me wrong, if 1 and 2 were both laying in my bed nude with their legs behind their heads i would plow away and cum inside with reckless abandon. But LJL at marrying or settling down with a landbeast like that. They look halfway decent because they're mid 20s.
If they were mid 30s or worse still, over 40, they would like absolutely horrific esp if they're eating and health (or lack thereof) habits continue. They are at their prime metabolisms and that shit certainly doesn't improve for women over time.
#3 I would settle down with all day and pop out 4 kids no problem.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504685) |
 |
Date: December 12th, 2025 2:19 PM Author: Fluffy twinkling selfie
"you're not self aware!"
"physical attraction is primal, not about rationalizations!"
-- goysuperstar, apparently suffering no cognitive dissonance from these contradictory positions
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809473&forum_id=2/#49504792) |
|
|