The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Subject: RE: The 'It'$ Ju$t a Comet' Gallery of Certified Morons
| Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 11/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 7th, 2025 8:49 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") Watching XO poa simpletons try to process `3I/Atlas` is a case study in failed cognition.
Your brains are desperate — panicked — to cram this thing into the "traditional comet" box so you can go back to $leep like $sheep.
The problem, as always, is the actual data, which none of you have bothered to read ljl
Let me explain this very $lowly, for the benefit of the terminally den$e:
(I) The Central Paradox
The "comet" explanation is collap$ing under the weight of one massive contradiction.
**1. It Has "Thrust."**
JPL's OWN navigation engineer, Davide Farnocchia, confirmed *this week* that `3I/Atlas` is exhibiting **ongoing** "non-gravitational acceleration." Something is actively pushing it besides the sun's gravity.
**2. It's Missing a "Tail."**
To produce that much thrust, the "comet" would need to be ejecting a *catastrophic* amount of its own mass (calculations are at 15%+). This isn't subtle. It would produce a massive, unmissable cloud of gas and dust.
**3. Deep photometry sees... nothing.**
No significant coma. No dust tail.
It has the **EFFECT** of a massive rocket engine, with none of the **EVIDENCE** of its exhaust. This is not a "puzzle." This is a fundamental, data-driven paradox.
---
(II) The Failed Rebuttals of the Ignorant
Now, let's address the two cope-filled arguments I $ee you losers trying to poa$t:
**FAILED ARGUMENT 1: "But... we don't know what's 'normal' for inter$tellar objects!"**
Wrong, you fags/idiot$. We have a control group.
His name was `2I/Borisov`. He was the second interstellar visitor. And he was *boringly normal*. He looked, acted, and died exactly like a "standard comet." He proved that our "traditional comet" model works perfectly fine... for *normal* comets.
**FAILED ARGUMENT 2: "But... 'Oumuamua was just a weird one-off!"**
This is the lazy fallback, and `3I/Atlas` just killed it.
We now have two objects, u fags... (`1I/'Oumuamua` and `3I/Atlas`) that exhibit the *exact same* "thrust-without-a-tail" anomaly, and one (`2I/Borisov`) that was perfectly normal.
This is no longer an anomaly. This is a pattern.
This isn't even mentioning the rest of the $tacked anomalies, like its statistically impossible orbital plane or the "distinctly bluer" color.
The "traditional comet" theory has failed to explain the data. Stop repeating it. Start reading the actual $cience. You are not skeptics; you are denier$ & should be burned at the stake. |