The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Not a lawyer but why "turn over" incriminating shit during "discovery"?
| arousing senate | 07/02/25 |
| Vibrant cream private investor cuck | 07/02/25 |
| arousing senate | 07/02/25 |
| avocado cerebral lay main people | 07/02/25 |
| Razzle space | 07/02/25 |
| crusty cuckold | 07/02/25 |
| Titillating Puppy | 07/02/25 |
| Tan Stage | 07/02/25 |
| Vibrant cream private investor cuck | 07/02/25 |
| Cobalt nibblets hunting ground | 07/02/25 |
| Irradiated home internal respiration | 07/02/25 |
| beta whorehouse | 07/02/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:08 PM Author: arousing senate The other side doesn't have it and doesn't know it exists, just don't give them the incriminating shit lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49066970) |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: Vibrant cream private investor cuck any big enough law firm is going to require that it have access to the clients files and will run search terms, etc. no point in an attorney refusing to turn it over even if the client doesn't want to. and theres going to be some degree of discovery on discovery/preservation efforts made. on a smaller level im sure it happens all the time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49066974) |
 |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:14 PM Author: arousing senate Ok hide it and then if the opposition somehow finds it you can play dumb and in that case ur furked anyway so game theory says ur best bet is to not voluntarily hand it over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49066988) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: avocado cerebral lay main people ome weird trick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49066975) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:26 PM Author: Razzle space winning isn't winning if it costs you your law license edit. i might have to rethink this |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:42 PM Author: crusty cuckold lol at it ever costing you your law license. Worst case is maybe getting your complaint/answer struck but that would be after multiple orders. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49067042) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:43 PM Author: Titillating Puppy Enjoy hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49067043) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:55 PM Author: Tan Stage This is why associates have a "bad docs" tag -- those are collected and sent to the partners so they can brainstorm reasons not to produce them, while the other 2 million pages of trash get produced.
The associates can later say they tagged it for further review and the partners can say "I thought this already got produced" if it ever surfaces through a third party or whatever. |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:04 PM Author: Vibrant cream private investor cuck "hot docs" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49067246) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:05 PM Author: Cobalt nibblets hunting ground "i don't think this document is even responsive!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49067249) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:23 PM Author: Irradiated home internal respiration (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49067291) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:35 PM Author: beta whorehouse Technically, it's not incriminating if it's not produced. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2/en-en/#49067318) |