six con justices holding pillow down on the face of Humphrey's Executor
| ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 09/22/25 | | humphrey's (((executor))) | 09/22/25 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 09/22/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 22nd, 2025 10:29 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
oh, it's going to go. libs furious (until they get to wield the power, in which case they will love it).
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/25a264_o759.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5778900&forum_id=2/en-en/#49292872) |
Date: September 22nd, 2025 10:33 PM Author: humphrey's (((executor))) ((zurich is stained))
i think you're right that it will go, but this decision is no different from the stay issued in the Wilcox case (NLRB member). definitely a signal, but they aren't deciding the issue on the merits so it's more of the same.
i think overturning humphrey's executor will be legally sound, but i am not sure it'll be good in practice.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5778900&forum_id=2/en-en/#49292884)
|
 |
Date: September 22nd, 2025 10:46 PM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5778900&forum_id=2/en-en/#49292926) |
|
|