XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/04/25 | | Glassy Sickened Masturbator | 07/04/25 | | claret domesticated sandwich garrison | 07/04/25 | | Provocative Cruise Ship | 07/04/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/04/25 | | Trip halford | 07/04/25 | | Glassy Sickened Masturbator | 07/04/25 | | Trip halford | 07/04/25 | | Glassy Sickened Masturbator | 07/04/25 | | Trip halford | 07/04/25 | | Glassy Sickened Masturbator | 07/05/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/05/25 | | 180 transparent library | 07/05/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | 180 transparent library | 07/05/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/05/25 | | 180 transparent library | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian lascivious famous landscape painting | 07/06/25 | | titillating black ape roommate | 07/05/25 | | shimmering clown | 07/06/25 | | titillating black ape roommate | 07/06/25 | | Trip halford | 07/06/25 | | titillating black ape roommate | 07/06/25 | | Trip halford | 07/06/25 | | irradiated self-absorbed fat ankles kitty | 07/05/25 | | irate goyim shitlib | 07/06/25 | | Bateful ebony pistol stag film | 07/05/25 | | Diverse Fantasy-prone Headpube | 07/06/25 | | Trip halford | 07/06/25 | | Aquamarine Glittery Stage Skinny Woman | 07/06/25 | | Trip halford | 07/06/25 | | buff vigorous elastic band theatre | 07/06/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | Carnelian lascivious famous landscape painting | 07/06/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | shimmering clown | 07/06/25 | | Beady-eyed bawdyhouse | 07/06/25 | | Aquamarine Glittery Stage Skinny Woman | 07/06/25 | | irate goyim shitlib | 07/06/25 | | Trip halford | 07/06/25 | | High-end umber home messiness | 07/06/25 | | arousing cream senate gay wizard | 07/06/25 | | flushed stead ceo | 07/06/25 | | arousing cream senate gay wizard | 07/06/25 | | razzle chestnut market really tough guy | 07/06/25 | | titillating black ape roommate | 07/06/25 | | Contagious church building | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Trip halford
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Trip halford
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Trip halford
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Trip halford
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Diverse Fantasy-prone Headpube
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: Carnelian lascivious famous landscape painting
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: irate goyim shitlib
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2/en-en/#49076800) |
|
|