“Gun violence isn’t a problem. Prove me wro…” *dies* 🤣🤣🤣
| queensbridge benzo | 09/17/25 | | ....,.,.;;;,.,,:,.,.,::,...,..,:,..,.. | 09/17/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 09/17/25 | | gibberish (?) | 09/17/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 09/17/25 | | queensbridge benzo | 09/17/25 | | queensbridge benzo | 09/17/25 | | queensbridge benzo | 09/18/25 | | Pumonymous | 09/18/25 | | queensbridge benzo | 09/18/25 | | Pumonymous | 09/18/25 | | queensbridge benzo | 09/18/25 | | Pumonymous | 09/18/25 | | queensbridge benzo | 09/18/25 | | Pumonymous | 09/18/25 | | To be fair | 09/18/25 | | "''"'''"""''' | 09/18/25 | | Charlie Kirk | 09/18/25 | | Pumonymous | 09/18/25 | | Charlie Kirk | 09/18/25 | | Pumonymous | 09/18/25 | | To be fair | 09/18/25 | | ,.,...,..,.,.,;...:,,..,:,.,.:.:.,:.::,. | 09/18/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: September 17th, 2025 10:28 PM
Author: ....,.,.;;;,.,,:,.,.,::,...,..,:,..,..
way to take the NPC line yet again
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776843&forum_id=2/en-en/#49280093) |
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:19 AM Author: Pumonymous
“We shouldn’t ban cars.”
*dies in car accident*
Wow, that guy sure looks stupid for saying we shouldn’t ban cars!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776843&forum_id=2/en-en/#49280405) |
 |
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:38 AM Author: Pumonymous
The point is that there’s a cost/benefit tradeoff in both cases.
With cars it’s the benefit of convenient transportation vs. the cost of accidental death.
With guns it’s the ability to defend yourself against attackers, use guns for hunting or other recreational purposes, be a gun collector, have an armed populace as a deterrent to totalitarian governments, or whatever other benefits conservatives consider guns to provide, vs. the cost of innocent people being murdered.
Of course you can argue that the costs outweigh the benefits in the case of guns, but if someone (such as Charlie Kirk) rejects that argument and believes that the benefits are worth it, then there’s nothing wrong with the car analogy itself. You need to actually argue your case that costs outweigh benefits for guns, rather than just assuming that to be true and relying on that assumption to refute the car analogy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776843&forum_id=2/en-en/#49280436) |
 |
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:57 AM Author: Pumonymous
“guns are no match for a tyrannical government“ - you guys really need to retire this argument
https://imgur.com/this-topic-comes-up-far-too-often-liking-im-getting-tired-of-posting-this-over-over-again-MqW14aW
anyway, the debate over whether gun legality is worth it, is beside the point. If a person believes that a certain number of deaths is acceptable to keep something legal, obviously they understand that they themselves could be one of the unlucky few. It’s not some hilarious dunk on Charlie Kirk. Do you think that if he’d survived the gunshot he’d have changed his mind about the second amendment?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776843&forum_id=2/en-en/#49280461) |
 |
Date: September 18th, 2025 1:42 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded)
To be fair,
"Unless they're Teslas, hehe!" sneered the extremely smart liberal with the biting wit.
Lol yeah brother thank god you didn't invest in that failing company that everybody hates now... if you had done something as stupid as that, you'd probably be poor now! ;)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776843&forum_id=2/en-en/#49280557) |
 |
Date: September 18th, 2025 2:15 AM
Author: ,.,...,..,.,.,;...:,,..,:,.,.:.:.,:.::,.
Oh SHIT, this dumbfuck sounding sudo no one heard of before (that is most definitely NOT a benzo alt) totally destroyed you with sound logic and substance and totally did not sound uneducated, poor, bald, felonious etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776843&forum_id=2/en-en/#49280599) |
|
|