Ozempic = devastating for claim that obesity crisis is not from overeating
| buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | clear ceo jew | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | clear ceo jew | 07/05/25 | | chrome mewling hell | 07/05/25 | | Confused dun whorehouse | 07/06/25 | | cordovan hairy legs | 07/05/25 | | red stead | 07/05/25 | | Fragrant brass goal in life | 07/06/25 | | Coral national puppy | 07/05/25 | | fantasy-prone cuckold chapel | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | Fragrant brass goal in life | 07/06/25 | | Crusty Gold Kitty Library | 07/05/25 | | red stead | 07/05/25 | | Fragrant brass goal in life | 07/06/25 | | Crusty Gold Kitty Library | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | Crusty Gold Kitty Library | 07/05/25 | | Fragrant brass goal in life | 07/06/25 | | comical cocky parlor | 07/06/25 | | underhanded skinny woman | 07/05/25 | | Coral national puppy | 07/05/25 | | underhanded skinny woman | 07/05/25 | | Coral national puppy | 07/05/25 | | charismatic chartreuse stage | 07/05/25 | | High-end Nursing Home | 07/05/25 | | charismatic chartreuse stage | 07/05/25 | | High-end Nursing Home | 07/05/25 | | Yapping legal warrant | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | charismatic chartreuse stage | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | charismatic chartreuse stage | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | charismatic chartreuse stage | 07/05/25 | | Well-lubricated hospital | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | Well-lubricated hospital | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | Well-lubricated hospital | 07/05/25 | | red stead | 07/05/25 | | Well-lubricated hospital | 07/05/25 | | Startling godawful public bath | 07/05/25 | | Drunken house mexican | 07/05/25 | | clear ceo jew | 07/05/25 | | Startling godawful public bath | 07/05/25 | | Drunken house mexican | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | Startling godawful public bath | 07/05/25 | | Ocher Stirring Abode | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | Well-lubricated hospital | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | Wonderful pea-brained boistinker state | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | Umber piazza useless brakes | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | soul-stirring personal credit line cruise ship | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/05/25 | | cowardly circlehead parlour | 07/05/25 | | Fragrant brass goal in life | 07/06/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | Umber piazza useless brakes | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | High-end Nursing Home | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/06/25 | | Flatulent quadroon mediation | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | aphrodisiac sandwich macaca | 07/05/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/05/25 | | Flatulent quadroon mediation | 07/06/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/06/25 | | supple trailer park | 07/06/25 | | deranged corn cake | 07/06/25 | | Submissive marketing idea kitchen | 07/06/25 | | contagious plum principal's office | 07/06/25 | | Fragrant brass goal in life | 07/06/25 | | buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression | 07/06/25 | | contagious plum principal's office | 07/07/25 | | Orange home | 07/06/25 | | contagious plum principal's office | 07/07/25 | | Bronze organic girlfriend | 07/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 5th, 2025 9:57 AM Author: buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression
All these “theories” about why obesity has been increasing that point to reasons other than fats overeating and not exercising have been EXPOSED as total lies.
All Ozempic does is make you eat less, and viola, fats lose weight when that happens.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073715) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 12:32 PM Author: Coral national puppy
i get it, and i'm not disagreeing, but i do want to understand this better.
suppose someone argues that CICO is too simple because some calories provoke your body's fullness sensors and some (perhaps processed foods) bypass the sensors.
if that's true, it's consistent with the success of these new drugs, right?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073972) |
Date: July 5th, 2025 10:06 AM Author: underhanded skinny woman
would not be surprised if long-term use ends up being linked to some cancers, particularly of the pancreas, which are almost always terminal. there are safer ways to suppress your appetite.
although to be fair, "eat less and exercise more" was easier when addictive, calorie-dense foods weren't as common as they are now. don't blame the fats entirely, but give them the majority of the blame.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073721) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 10:51 AM Author: charismatic chartreuse stage
> Calorie per dollar declined
Obesity is more common in poor people
> More cars per capita
Maybe. OP said it was all over-eating
> Calorie in calorie out
The conservation of energy is bedrock. And it is about as explanative for the obesity epidemic as it is for the 1970s energy crisis. You need to learn to distinguish proximate and ultimate causes.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073794) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 11:44 AM Author: charismatic chartreuse stage
CICO is true, whether or not ozempic works, and is hardly proved by it.
The obesity epidemic, which is new, is not explained by CICO, which has always been true.
In fact, obesity is caused by the historically novel easy availability of nutrition-dense (ie., calorie-dense), easily digestible, and highly-palatable (ie., addictive) foods. Take away any of those three things, and obesity is not as bad. Take them away during childhood, and obesity is not as bad. In the presence of all three, genetic resistance to massive weight gain has historically been the best prophylactic, with "discipline" being rarely effective for more than a 1-2 year time frame.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073876) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 12:22 PM Author: buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression
"No one on this board claimed CICO was false"
*links you to multiple threads*
The point of this thread is extremely simple: CICO is not flame, its vey real, and ozempic makes that clear. not really interested in your or donnys jewish sophistry.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073956) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 12:34 PM Author: supple trailer park
"you don't want to be a part of such a midwit debate"
*joins debate*
what you're saying isn't particularly hard to understand. if someone is too obtuse to understand that's on them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073975) |
Date: July 5th, 2025 10:58 AM Author: Well-lubricated hospital
Ozempic actually just shows that regulating food intake has almost nothing to do with discipline. It’s just that some bodies say they are full earlier than others.
Not a fat but that’s the obvious takeaway.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073803) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 4:45 PM Author: aphrodisiac sandwich macaca
Diets don't work.
You can only achieve your goals with a true change in how you live your life, from this day to the end.
All the strength you need is inside you, bro.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49074500) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 11:56 AM Author: Well-lubricated hospital
No one has ever argued that food consumption doesn’t correlate with weight. If you don’t eat you lose weight.
Ozempic shows these people aren’t necessary overeating…they are eating until they are full just like everyone else.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073887)
|
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 12:21 PM Author: aphrodisiac sandwich macaca
Xennial.
Smoking was really big in the '90s, and there was a huge (& successful) anti-smoking push in the '00s.
I really thought they'd go after obesity in the same manner, but, unfortunately, no.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49073949) |
Date: July 5th, 2025 2:33 PM Author: Umber piazza useless brakes
I sort of see the OP's point, but I think the argument was always that our modern society and frankenstein food and microplastics is throwing off our natural digestive process.
I'm not sure how this is "disproved" by the fact that you can your body more in line with its natural chemical state by injecting Gila Monster venom into your stomach.
Moreover, it looks like one big way it works is it physically keeps food in your stomach for longer - which again, suggests (i) hunger is not simply a mental test but has a physical component as well and (ii) the physical component is influenced heavily by hormones.
So I'd challenge the OP, if Gila Monster venom can keep food in your stomach for longer, isn't it possible that food dyes/microplastics/chemical sweeteners/background radiation could have the reverse effect?
My point has always been people started getting super fat in the late 90s early 2000s with super sized McDonald's meals. People don't really eat that stuff anymore, plus more people are exercising than ever, yet (until Ozempic) people are still getting fatter....
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49074198) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 2:40 PM Author: aphrodisiac sandwich macaca
"People don't really eat that stuff anymore"
People are eating out more than ever, and it's all similarly bad food. Even in grocery stores, real food is a very small part of what they sell.
"more people are exercising than ever"
I think people talk about exercising more than ever, and buy more exercising products/services. ("Look how many steps this screen said I took yesterday!")
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49074210) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 3:00 PM Author: buck-toothed flickering brunch indirect expression
my only point from the beginning to the end of this thread is that CICO deniers including some on this board are dumb and I've linked several of those threads above.
but its impossible to deny CICO now, because *even if* all these other explanations have any merit, CICO is still king, none of them supersede CICO, and sticking solely with CICO is all that is necessary.
the solution to losing weight, as has now been conclusively proven with ozempic, is just eat less, as ozempic forces you to do. all these other factors dont matter if you just eat less, thats the point. CICO is still king.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49074272) |
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 5:26 PM Author: cowardly circlehead parlour
Midwit take, who tf is arguing that hard against CICO?
If anything ozempic shows humans don’t have free will and thus you can’t attach any moral failure for obesity. What you really want to do is judge obese people for their “choices” , just like generations before you judged addicts, those with mental illness, epileptics, etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49074556)
|
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 7:53 PM Author: Umber piazza useless brakes
CICO is idiotic. The body is not a closed energy system and different types of calories are obviously processed very differently. Eating 2,400 calories in steak in one sitting is different than eating 2,400 calories in cake in one sitting which is different than eating 100 calories of soda every hour.
I think xoxo has always been on board with the "eat less, move more" movement in terms of losing weight for an individual.
But I'm sympathetic to the idea that Americans didn't go from being 10% obese to 50% obese simply because people started moving less and eating more - it seems like in the 90s almost everyone was naturally normal looking even if they did eat McDonalds 5 timse a week and never worked out. People then ate tons of sugary cereals and chips and cookies too. Now conversely there's lots of people who eat salads every day and who go to some type of gym a few times a week and are still 30 pounds overweight.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49074927)
|
 |
Date: July 5th, 2025 8:50 PM Author: supple trailer park
it applies to everyone because we all have human bodies and consume food and most want to be healthy. and it matters for the sake of it for anyone interested in truth, i.e. autists and nerds.
so yeah for non-athletic normies "count calories, *eat a high quality and balanced diet, and exercise" is cr and most attempts to learn the science behind food just confuse the issue if youre trying to get normies to be healthy.
*eating mcdonalds at a caloric deficit will cause weight loss but is still super unhealthy
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49075028) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 9:22 AM Author: contagious plum principal's office
As someone on one of these (not Ozempic, but Zepbound), let me provide some perspective
1) I am down about 45 lbs since March
2) Obesity is caused by calorie in / calorie out - eating less is the key. Quality of foods is secondary in terms of weight (obviously matters in terms of health, body composition, etc)
3) Ozempic makes you think about food less, and eat less when you do. When I was at my biggest, I would have a nice dinner, go out for drinks with friends, and have shitty food (second dinner) after drinking. I wouldn’t feel “full” after doing this. Now, not only can I physically not do that (because I feel too full), I don’t want to. People who are obese think about food more, usually don’t feel full, and often have emotional feedback loops that lead to overeating. Ozempic stops all of that.
4) Sedentary lifestyle plays a role - but the biggest misconception to me is that Ozempic is something you do instead of working out. If you are fat, and lose a bunch of weight, you actually want to start working out to gain muscle, look better, etc. You are more likely to feel comfortable in a gym instead of self conscious. You respond well to progress. And this is critical, you don’t get hungrier after doing cardio, because you aren’t hungry at all. More widespread adoption of Ozempic will lead to more working out overall, not less.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746393&forum_id=2/en-en/#49075852) |
|
|