The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
It's going to be 180 when a case gets decided on a hallucinated citation
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:15 AM Author: Up-to-no-good pink water buffalo And becomes law because the judge doesn't notice. Say for instance a lawyer files a brief with a fake or misdescribed authority and then the opposing party doesn't catch it and the Judge or clerk relies on it. The court issues an opinion adopting the hallucination. Later courts cite that opinion. What's funny about this is noone would even have to cite the AI hallucination they just cite the real judge's opinion. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848670) |
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:17 AM Author: talented scarlet doctorate very trippy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848681) |
 |
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:18 AM Author: Up-to-no-good pink water buffalo Pretty much guaranteed to happen at this point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848685) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:21 AM Author: aromatic field old irish cottage i wa about to poast how this definitely won't happen and after thinking for a sec i realized it definitely will.
it'll eventually be caught when somebody searches for the underlying authority. which will probably result in a very funny appellate opinion. |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 12:32 PM Author: Up-to-no-good pink water buffalo Would be hilarious if it got vacated and then someone still decides to cite the vacated hallucination-tainted case. Someone absolutely will try to cite it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848891) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 12:52 PM Author: aromatic field old irish cottage bluebook is gonna have to standardize an abbreviation for hallucination in citations (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848896) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:47 PM Author: Swashbuckling Cowardly Selfie Theater Stage (A.I. Flme.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849223) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:17 PM Author: Sable Embarrassed To The Bone Resort the funny part will be KBJ arguing there is no difference between the real and AI cite where both reveal important truths
|
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 6:39 PM Author: aromatic field old irish cottage MAH LIVED EXPERIENCE AINT IN NO OPINION BUT I STILL RELIES UPON IT, SO WHY SHOULDN'T... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849568) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:23 AM Author: big-titted business firm Someone should make an AI that specifically checks for this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848696) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:48 PM Author: Swashbuckling Cowardly Selfie Theater Stage and an AI that checks the AI that specifically checks for this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849224) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:05 PM Author: Appetizing lettuce parlour Lexis brief analyzer existed long before AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849273) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:25 AM Author: wonderful trailer park It's 100% going to happen. In my state, the judge usually asks the party that wins the motion to draft the order granting his motion. I highly doubt they check much of anything in the orders that are sent in. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848699) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 10:28 AM Author: maniacal striped hyena site happens all of the time w made up shit
will eventually be 99% of laws |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: Up-to-no-good pink water buffalo This already happened before AI with people copying citations from ttt textbooks and shit like that or accidentally citing hypos (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49848888) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:59 PM Author: flirting ticket booth knife Only the Torah scroll is consistent throughout time (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849255) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 7:57 PM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., secular jew torah scholars claim a typo in the binding of issac:
https://archive.ph/vWMpK |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 3:28 PM Author: Tantric Wagecucks Reading Party Hallucinations can make good points. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849043) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:38 PM Author: Up-to-no-good pink water buffalo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849215) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 3:30 PM Author: Self-absorbed Range two federal judges issued hallucinatory opinions although it's not clear that the AI caused a wrong decision. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849048) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:41 PM Author: Tan church codepig Damn we're fukt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849217) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:46 PM Author: Tan church codepig It's interesting bc if the hallucination is just part of the argument and not the whole thing, we'll never know if it was Responsible for the judge's decision. Even the judge probably does not have precise enough access to their epistemic state at the time to say. So even if it's discovered later it probably won't be easy to overturn the original decision. And by then it's exploded to other cases anyway and become a part of Law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849222) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 4:49 PM Author: Pearl trust fund this has almost certainly happened many times already just with someone making shit up (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849226) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:04 PM Author: Appetizing lettuce parlour Cr this is a bizarre thread that assumes "making shit up" is the exclusive realm of AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849271) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:07 PM Author: Swashbuckling Cowardly Selfie Theater Stage nobody made up fake cases before. they made retarded arguments and made up law tho. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849284) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:14 PM Author: Tan church codepig (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849306) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:19 PM Author: Appetizing lettuce parlour Nobody ever "makes up" cases even with AI
But sample briefs get degraded after being used the umpteenth time like a game of telephone, including case names and citations
The vast majority of real case citations don't even have accurate pin cites or even state the actual proposition of case holding |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 6:04 PM Author: Swashbuckling Cowardly Selfie Theater Stage AI literally makes up cases that dont exist -- infinitely worse than a typical shitlaw brief that's got a misquote or a bad pin cite or even a typo in a cite (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849449) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 6:11 PM Author: Sable Embarrassed To The Bone Resort i recall asking CGPT about a trade agreement i didn't want to read. it gave an amazingly detailed answer, provided a summary of how it had been used, what the significance was... all based on sections of the agreement that simply did not exist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849474) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 5:13 PM Author: Up-to-no-good pink water buffalo No I never assumed it didn't happen, but there is just a big difference, because the barrier to entry for lying is way lower, and so easy to do on accident (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849303) |
|
Date: April 28th, 2026 7:42 PM Author: Candy Ride It's not substantively any different than an opinion citing a law review article. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5861297&forum_id=2/en-en/#49849707) |