was there theoretically a time in history when "women" weren't complete shit
| Drunken round eye piazza | 05/11/25 | | vibrant sexy trump supporter address | 05/11/25 | | Drunken round eye piazza | 05/11/25 | | vibrant sexy trump supporter address | 05/11/25 | | topaz institution | 05/11/25 | | Drunken round eye piazza | 05/11/25 | | fluffy charismatic clown | 05/11/25 | | Onyx vivacious stag film chad | 05/11/25 | | topaz institution | 05/11/25 | | opaque gaping set | 05/11/25 | | Drunken round eye piazza | 05/11/25 | | topaz institution | 05/11/25 | | opaque gaping set | 05/11/25 | | Drunken round eye piazza | 05/11/25 | | topaz institution | 05/11/25 | | Curious Magical Keepsake Machete | 05/11/25 | | Disgusting beady-eyed field | 05/11/25 | | topaz institution | 05/15/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 11th, 2025 9:53 AM Author: opaque gaping set
Martin Luther (1483–1546):
“Let them bear children till they die of it; that is what they are for.”
Aristotle’s views, revived in universities, cast women as deformed men—“passive” vessels incapable of reason.
Malleus Maleficarum (1487): A best-selling witch-hunting manual claimed women are inherently more prone to evil, lust, and deception.
Schopenhauer: “Woman is an animal with long hair and short thoughts.”
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5723538&forum_id=2:#48921246)
|
|
|