SCOTUS Stays Hawaii Judge's Order Trying To Stop Trump Trannie Passport Ban
| unholy address yarmulke | 11/06/25 | | unholy address yarmulke | 11/06/25 | | Out-of-control walnut jap | 11/06/25 | | unholy address yarmulke | 11/06/25 | | Out-of-control walnut jap | 11/06/25 | | Big-titted Lay Mediation | 11/06/25 | | hairless stage community account | 11/07/25 | | green gas station | 11/06/25 | | unholy address yarmulke | 11/06/25 | | green gas station | 11/06/25 | | mind-boggling hall friendly grandma | 11/06/25 | | Big-titted Lay Mediation | 11/06/25 | | green gas station | 11/06/25 | | mind-boggling hall friendly grandma | 11/06/25 | | mind-boggling hall friendly grandma | 11/06/25 | | unholy address yarmulke | 11/06/25 | | Out-of-control walnut jap | 11/06/25 | | stirring know-it-all business firm clown | 11/06/25 | | boyish costumed windowlicker heaven | 11/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:04 PM Author: unholy address yarmulke
JUSTICE JACKSON, with whom JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR and
JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting from the grant of application for stay.
As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction
pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court
misunderstands the assignment
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2:#49407938) |
 |
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: unholy address yarmulke
dissent p. 9:
But how urgent can
this interest be when the Passport Policy itself allows
transgender Americans who already have passports with
sex markers reflecting their current gender identity to continue using those passports until they expire?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2:#49407977) |
Date: November 6th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: mind-boggling hall friendly grandma
As is becoming routine, the Government seeks an emergency stay of a District Court’s preliminary injunction
pending appeal. As is also becoming routine, this Court
misunderstands the assignment.
Our task in deciding stay applications is not simply to
make a “back-of-the-napkin assessment of which party has
the better legal argument.” Noem v. Doe, 605 U. S. ___, ___
(2025) (JACKSON, J., dissenting from grant of stay) (slip op.,
at 3).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794337&forum_id=2:#49407976) |
|
|