So will Obama be forced to resign over this Benghazi stuff or no
| angry temple jap | 05/10/13 | | poppy abode | 05/10/13 | | cordovan pistol | 05/10/13 | | filthy hissy fit indian lodge | 05/10/13 | | Awkward place of business | 05/10/13 | | Awkward place of business | 05/10/13 | | very tactful carnelian gas station sandwich | 05/10/13 | | angry temple jap | 05/10/13 | | very tactful carnelian gas station sandwich | 05/10/13 | | Medicated stead | 05/10/13 | | Hideous range | 05/11/13 | | jet-lagged floppy codepig menage | 05/10/13 | | slap-happy black mood | 05/10/13 | | big mildly autistic sanctuary laser beams | 05/10/13 | | grizzly splenetic gaping | 05/10/13 | | saffron home | 05/10/13 | | Comical fear-inspiring office | 05/10/13 | | Medicated stead | 05/10/13 | | drab unhinged property black woman | 05/10/13 | | vengeful hall | 07/14/13 | | vengeful hall | 07/14/13 | | jet meetinghouse ratface | 12/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:26 PM Author: cordovan pistol
Its just the right wing hype machine, but it would be pretty lolzy if the House impeached him. obviously no way the senate convicts, but it would be great for the lulz.
sadly John Boehner is no Newton Leroy Gingrich, so this won't happen.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2:#23172141) |
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:31 PM Author: filthy hissy fit indian lodge
no idea but this is the title of the article on the front of foxnews.com:
AP/Reuters
"Newly released emails are raising additional questions about the Obama administration's story-line on the Benghazi attack, showing top-level efforts to downplay terrorism ahead of public statements by UN Ambassador Susan Rice."
assuming this is true, i think it's just sort of a big "so what".
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2:#23172153)
|
Date: May 10th, 2013 2:51 PM Author: Awkward place of business
Love the idiot-liberal Google+ comments on the story:
"I agree totally with you, +Joshua Deighan The problem is that the USA has a history of, and believes in, adversarial justice, which by definition means that SOMEONE must bear the blame, irrespective of facts. Once a "blame" target has been identified, then the looney-tunes from BOTH sides have a "valid" argument (in their minds) of why "X" (the blame) is lousy for America, or his/her political party, or why all OTHER bad things can be attributed to him/her/it."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2252567&forum_id=2:#23172257) |
|
|