PROTIP: use "Websters dictionary defines..." to start ur closing
| Aphrodisiac garrison | 04/24/15 | | Demanding Abode | 04/24/15 | | Seedy Adventurous Principal's Office | 04/24/15 | | Transparent native marketing idea | 04/24/15 | | Cracking Stage | 10/22/15 | | amber tanning salon jew | 10/22/15 | | ivory aromatic sanctuary | 10/22/15 | | territorial plaza | 10/22/15 | | Doobsian police squad | 10/22/15 | | Idiotic Idiot Temple | 10/08/25 | | comical legal warrant | 10/22/15 | | Aphrodisiac garrison | 05/16/16 | | brilliant knife legend | 05/16/16 | | Aphrodisiac garrison | 05/16/16 | | brilliant knife legend | 05/16/16 | | Aphrodisiac garrison | 05/16/16 | | nighttime international law enforcement agency | 12/28/16 | | Alcoholic School Cafeteria | 12/28/16 | | exciting olive sneaky criminal | 12/28/16 | | nighttime international law enforcement agency | 11/11/20 | | bearded boltzmann | 07/26/24 | | Trip Nursing Home Feces | 10/08/25 | | MAHA Movement | 11/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 2:57 PM Author: Aphrodisiac garrison
It has a reputation now as this hackneyed expression, which is why it WORKS. The jury always perks up because it's so unexpected. Also it frames the issue very clearly: this is the plain definition, here are the facts, the facts don't match the accusation, acquittal. I literally bring a well-worn old dictionary and thump it onto the jury railing.
Prosecutors get flustered as FUCK and end up reacting to me rather than making their own case, and it makes them look gay as hell. They smirk or scoff, which makes them look like douches. They usually take time in their own closings to say something about "the defense counsel's old tricks and theatrics" but that just reminds the jury even more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2862749&forum_id=2:#27751704) |
|
|