...	hideous coral codepig principal's office	07/01/25
trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is r...	nudist electric furnace stead	07/01/25
Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. ...	hideous coral codepig principal's office	07/01/25
James Bond surfing in die another day	odious fuchsia site juggernaut	07/01/25
Not even as bad as you’d think	hideous coral codepig principal's office	07/01/25

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:13 AM Author: hideous coral codepig principal's office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2:#49062617)

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:37 AM Author: nudist electric furnace stead trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is ruinous. This is why practical effects are necessary. While the FX from 80s monster movies have definitely aged they are at least still watchable and appreciable for the craft that went into them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2:#49062648)

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:28 AM Author: hideous coral codepig principal's office Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. Good CGI isn’t even that expensive. Westerners just suck at making things efficiently. District 9 looked impressive iirc and it had a lowish budget iirc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2:#49063141)

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:44 AM Author: odious fuchsia site juggernaut James Bond surfing in die another day (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2:#49062660)

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:24 AM Author: hideous coral codepig principal's office Not even as bad as you’d think (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2:#49063133)