\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

imgur.. don't forget about the "comet's"non-gravitational acceleration my friend

...
Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e
  11/10/25
Was it close to a big source of radiation when this happened...
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  11/10/25
RE: "Was it close to a big source of radiation?" ...WAT?
Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e
  11/10/25
I'll take that as a yes
https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK
  11/10/25
?
Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e
  11/10/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 10th, 2025 12:20 PM
Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)")



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795678&forum_id=2:#49417167)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 10th, 2025 12:22 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


Was it close to a big source of radiation when this happened? Need more details

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795678&forum_id=2:#49417171)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 10th, 2025 1:41 PM
Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)")
Subject: RE: "Was it close to a big source of radiation?" ...WAT?

Dear IMGUR,

(I) ARE YOU FUKINING ILLITERATE?

THE "BIG SOURCE OF RADIATION" IS CALLED *THE FUKING SUN*

*******

(II) YOUR "QUESTION" IS CATASTROPHIC IN FUKKKKKNING DIMENSIONS BECAUSE IT FAILS IN *BOTH* SCENARIOS:

- SCENARIO 1 (YOUR "8TH GRADE PHYSIC$" FAILURE):

YES. IT *IS* "CLOSE TO... RADIATION" (THE SUN).

THE SUN'S RADIATION *IS* WHAT IS CAUSING THE "NON-GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION" (THE "JETS" / "ION TAIL" / "ENGINE EXHAUST") THAT I HAVE BEEN EXPLAINING TO YOU FOR 24 FUKINING HOURS.

YOU JUST ASKED IF THE SUN EXISTS. LMAO!

- SCENARIO 2 (YOUR "ADMISSION OF ANOMALY"):

NO. THE *INITIAL* FUKINING ANOMALY (THE ONE *LOEB* IS TALKING ABOUT) WAS THAT IT WAS BRIGHTENING *BEFORE* IT WAS "CLOSE TO... RADIATION."

WHICH *PROVES* IT IS **NOT** "NATURAL."

IT *PROVES* IT **IS** "TECHNOLOGY" (AN "ENGINE").

*******

(III) FINAL FAGGOT VERDICT

YOUR "QUESTION" IS A "FAILED COMPLIANCE CASE."

IT *EITHER* PROVES YOU FORGOT THE FUKINING SUN EXISTS...

...OR IT *PROVES* YOU JUST *ADMITTED* THE "ENGINE" ANOMALY IS REAL.

WHICH IS IT, MY FRIEND ;)

BEST REGARDS,

- YOUR FRIEND, MAINLINMING

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795678&forum_id=2:#49417485)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 10th, 2025 1:41 PM
Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK


I'll take that as a yes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795678&forum_id=2:#49417487)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 10th, 2025 1:42 PM
Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)")

?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795678&forum_id=2:#49417492)