fiercer war: '90s console wars or current smartphone wars?
| fiercely-loyal chocolate lettuce | 10/26/12 | | Abnormal pozpig twinkling uncleanness | 10/26/12 | | slimy bonkers area | 10/26/12 | | medicated idiot | 10/26/12 | | Charismatic emerald persian | 10/26/12 | | Talented avocado state | 10/26/12 | | Arousing kitchen | 10/26/12 | | Red station | 10/26/12 | | Bateful indecent business firm | 10/26/12 | | Peter Brady | 05/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:00 AM Author: Red station
Penis
/thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2:#21889882) |
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:36 AM Author: Bateful indecent business firm
From the perspective of consumer engagement, the console wars were unrivaled. Back then, it was rare to have two consoles, and I remember kids arguing endlessly over the merits of each.
No one really cares about the differences between an iPhone and a Galaxy. One reason is that you don't really have to pay the full cost of your phone, and another is that these things get replaced about every year or two, unlike consoles which were a 5 year investment.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2:#21889909) |
|
|