fiercer war: '90s console wars or current smartphone wars?
| boyish public bath | 10/26/12 | | irradiated twinkling uncleanness lettuce | 10/26/12 | | Jade Stubborn Tanning Salon Patrolman | 10/26/12 | | Stimulating Onyx Property Toilet Seat | 10/26/12 | | histrionic foreskin | 10/26/12 | | scarlet native | 10/26/12 | | amethyst heady space ladyboy | 10/26/12 | | Black hairraiser halford | 10/26/12 | | Vermilion Bonkers Multi-billionaire Gunner | 10/26/12 | | Fantasy-prone theater blood rage | 05/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:00 AM Author: Black hairraiser halford
Penis
/thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2:#21889882) |
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:36 AM Author: Vermilion Bonkers Multi-billionaire Gunner
From the perspective of consumer engagement, the console wars were unrivaled. Back then, it was rare to have two consoles, and I remember kids arguing endlessly over the merits of each.
No one really cares about the differences between an iPhone and a Galaxy. One reason is that you don't really have to pay the full cost of your phone, and another is that these things get replaced about every year or two, unlike consoles which were a 5 year investment.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2:#21889909) |
|
|