Ninth Circuit says Trump can use OR National Guard
| rambunctious chapel pozpig | 10/20/25 | | Heady headpube | 10/20/25 | | aphrodisiac frozen menage | 10/20/25 | | Idiotic regret cruise ship | 10/20/25 | | vigorous macaca | 10/20/25 | | crimson vibrant garrison | 10/20/25 | | rambunctious chapel pozpig | 10/20/25 | | vigorous macaca | 10/20/25 | | Blue field | 10/20/25 | | crimson vibrant garrison | 10/20/25 | | rambunctious chapel pozpig | 10/20/25 | | buck-toothed bipolar library puppy | 10/20/25 | | rambunctious chapel pozpig | 10/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:34 PM Author: rambunctious chapel pozpig
lol.
https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/1980359504027087077
Andrew Kolvet
@AndrewKolvet
🚨BREAKING: MSNBC Legal correspondent Lisa Rubin is visibly upset after learning that the 9th Circuit has just issued an emergency motion that authorizes President Trump to deploy the National Guard to Portland.
"We conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. Section 12406.
"We thus conclude that defendants are likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal."
The president has broad discretion to determine when and where to deploy the Guard. That doesn't make him a King, it makes him a constitutionally bound president.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362322) |
Date: October 20th, 2025 7:03 PM Author: buck-toothed bipolar library puppy
Libs are so fucking stupid it is unreal
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/10/20/25-6268.pdf
Second, the district court erred by placing too much weight on statements the
President made on social media. Oregon, 2025 WL 2817646, at *11. The district court interpreted President Trump characterizing Portland as "War ravaged," as the equivalent of the President "ignoring the facts on the ground." Id. As such, the district court relied on these statements to disregard other facts that do "reflect] a colorable assessment of the facts and law within a range of honest judgment." Id.
(citation modified).
This was error for two reasons. For one, under Newsom, we consider whether the facts provide a colorable basis to support the conclusion that the executive branch is unable with regular forces to execute the law. Even if the President may exaggerate the extent of the problem on social media, this does not change that other facts provide a colorable basis to support the statutory requirements." For another, the President's social media post characterizing Portland as "War ravaged" may reasonably be viewed as a part of his assessment under § 12406(2)'s "rebellion" prong, which we do not reach. Id.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362711) |
|
|