So the Brits ruled India for 200+ years but cldn't CIVILIZE them, is that rite?
| Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | Snowy awkward hospital karate | 09/08/25 | | passionate slap-happy station | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | painfully honest locale | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | Snowy awkward hospital karate | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | painfully honest locale | 09/08/25 | | marvelous slate point | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | Magical Ungodly Hairy Legs | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | Dull library water buffalo | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 | | Charismatic Ape | 09/08/25 | | wonderful organic girlfriend | 09/08/25 | | Electric beta office ladyboy | 09/08/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 8th, 2025 10:45 AM Author: passionate slap-happy station
I get the sense that aboriginal Indians are extremely resistant to change and very difficult to civilize.
Look at the Sentinalise. Violent and uncivilized. Now understand that every turd you see is 20-80% Sentinalise type abbo. What are you going to do with these people?
Before the British, they were under Islamic occupation. But even they weren't able to clean the shit up. Most Arab countries, even the poor ones, are clean. Even Gaza, pre-genocide, looked a thousand times better than India.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5770916&forum_id=2Ã#49244960)
|
Date: September 8th, 2025 3:41 PM Author: marvelous slate point
real talk: former british empire subjects are much more civilized than subjects of other birdshit empires.
aglophile places are way less buckwild than anything else
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5770916&forum_id=2Ã#49245750) |
|
|