Tucker described Duke as someone whose M.O. was endorsing prominent right wing figures - including Tucker - in order to render them toxic by association.

But in the next breath he denounced Fuentes for relentlessly 'attacking' everyone on the right and endorsing Kamala Harris in 2024.

These criticisms are completely incoherent.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189120)

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/alexia_barlier

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189221)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Murray

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189284)

Link?

And before you credulously invoke whatever retarded bullshit claim Milo Yiannopolous (who is a literal ethnic Jew and a Brit and a faggot that got universally cancelled for actually being an unironic gay pedophilia apologist a few years ago) or some other actual Fed posted on "X" (which is a platform where there are absolutely no repercussions for lying) with absolutely no receipts backing it up, maybe you can first step back for a minute and explain how it is that NF's personal lawyer submitted a sworn declaration under penalty of perjury a year or two ago in which he attested to the fact that NF has never had any form of communication with any federal agency, either directly or through an agent. Oh and btw, just for the record so there's no confusion about this, that affidavit was signed and dated *after* NF had already gotten all of his money back from the government following their seizure of it in the wake of J6 -- which is the transaction that most of NF's detractors usually like to point out when they claim that he "cut a deal with the feds."

So if that sworn affidavit is true, then with whom did NF cut this "deal" and how did he accomplish that without communicating with any federal agency either directly or through an agent at any point in the process?

Or was NF's lawyer just willing to blatantly lie under oath about this *easily disprovable* statement of alleged fact, and thereby subject himself to the risk of permanent disbarment and several years of imprisonment in federal prison for perjury? Pretty incredible, if true... now THAT'S what I call having an unwavering professional dedication to furthering your client's interests at all costs!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189226)

OK, I re-read it.

Do you have a substantive response to my question?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189233)

That sounds like a "nope."

Thank

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189245)

NF literally showed screenshots highlighting the exact language on his livestream last week or whatever, so it shouldn't be too hard to fine.

I'm sure all of the XO Jews crowing about how NF is an "obvious fed" who "clearly cut a deal with the CIA" or whatever will get right on this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189252)

but many NF detractors on xo must be lawyers. so they should be forced to acknowledge this sworn testimony or explain how it doesn't cast doubt on NF being a federal informant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189265)

They already addressed this above -- I believe their devastating substantive response was "lol," IIRC.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189272)

This is really important btw and the fate of the white race is hanging in the balance based on this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189194)

"Lmao wait, so this guy was a failed painter with a silly mustache who couldn't even get into art school? And this was BEFORE he also became a convicted felon and spent years rotting in prison? And you expect me to take him seriously as a populist political figure? The fate of Germany rests on his shoulders? LMAO yeah, sure thing bud..."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189285)

You a pedo too?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5762912&forum_id=2Ã#49189209)