The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
a person with IQ = 130 is as far from "normal" as an IQ = 70 actual mental retar
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 6th, 2025 11:50 AM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot IQ = 130 is 2 x standard deviations above average IQ [for whites] = 100 IQ = 70 is the borderline for mental retardation and is 2 x standard deviations BELOW average assuming that most people here have IQ > 130 [a realistic assumption imo], we forget sometimes that we are as far in intelligence from the "normal" person as the normal person is from the actual official mentally retarded person I don't know what this means, I'm just saying |
Date: October 6th, 2025 11:55 AM Author: grizzly dashing station "IQ" doesn't really scale linearly though
a 130 IQ person has vastly more capabilities than a 100 IQ person due to abstract thought than a 100 IQ person does compared to a 70 IQ person
the main difference between 100 IQ people and 70 IQ people is that the former group doesn't need to be constantly supervised in order to be productive |
 |
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:09 PM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot I don’t know if this is true at IQ 100 a person is sufficiently capable of abstract thought to engage in counter factual thinking at IQ 70 (retarded whites, or average africans) counter factual thinking is completely impossible “what about if you didn’t have a drink today / rob a convenience store today?” “but I did have a drink / rob a convenience store today” |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:16 PM Author: grizzly dashing station 100mos cannot do abstract counterfactuals ime. they can only do counterfactuals that involve themselves, like the breakfast example, because there exists a non-abstract frame of reference for them
completely abstract counterfactuals are very difficult and nobody under ~120 iq is able to navigate them |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:35 PM Author: twinkling queen of the night This is frightening (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329189) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 11:59 AM Author: Black Shaky Roommate Hell (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328832) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:21 PM Author: charismatic dragon it means we should all be on disability (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328932) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:35 PM Author: provocative umber market giraffe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328968) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:34 PM Author: Bateful casino voyeur i think this is all probably true but would suggest that using the mean/median for the entire population is a misleading baseline for people like the modal xo poa. most people with whom your typical white-collarmo will ever meaningfully interact with professionally will be well above average compared to the population as a whole. i think xo has a tendency to underestimate iq as a result of this bias. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328966) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:36 PM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot I think the average IQ for white collarmos is more around 105-110 at most, I think even for white collarmos XO has an average IQ substantially above the white collar average (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328976) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:40 PM Author: Bateful casino voyeur once again, agreed on both fronts with the additional caveat that people with standard xo poa profiles will typically be interacting with a subset of white collar professionals a cut above the average white-collarmo (with your second claim still remaining true). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328986) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:42 PM Author: provocative umber market giraffe 10-15 years ago sure but your median xo poster today is not particularly smart (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328991) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:36 PM Author: Vigorous embarrassed to the bone location “130+ iq has surprising parallels to being retarded” tell me something i don’t know
|
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:37 PM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49328978) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 2:34 PM Author: Bateful casino voyeur (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329492) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 12:41 PM Author: bipolar laughsome elastic band locale life is not set up to require high iq i expect interactions between 100 iq and 130 iq are not problematic. facebook is a good example. the 100 iqs sure like to post a lot. it's annoying, but tolerable. yes, donald, even though you never saw the honor roll in high school, your political observations are really astute. 70 iq is different. that's brain dead.
|
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 2:44 PM Author: Black Shaky Roommate Hell i find this group much more trouble. they are the karens, and the shitlibs, and the chemtrail people of the world. they have opinions, they are insane, and they push them with religious fervor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329564) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 2:45 PM Author: grizzly dashing station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329573) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:07 PM Author: alcoholic federal stage I think it’s a borderline miracle on some level that my iq is 149 and I can still somehow get pussy tbh (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329070) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: Citrine therapy Does 130 seem like a lot to you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329104) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: Aromatic Amethyst Clown Associate i doubt anyone here has an IQ > 130 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329110) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:21 PM Author: Garnet Base Feces (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329136) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:32 PM Author: Saffron Foreskin Multi-billionaire 132 tested here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329180) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:33 PM Author: maize police squad 130 IQ is like a physics major at a State U (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329183) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:35 PM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot cr see my post immediately below (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329195) |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:35 PM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot I think many if not most poasters do 130 is top 2.5% of the whole population, 1 in 40 of the population have an IQ that high or higher, that’s not actually very rarified 145 is 1 in 1000 I don’t think many poasters today would reach that although 1 or 2 might but in our circles and here on xo 130 is not special |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:37 PM Author: grizzly dashing station there are a lot of dumb ppl here but def a bunch who are 130+ too
130 is not that smart. i'm 131 IQ btw |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 1:39 PM Author: Cowardly Flesh Mexican Coffee Pot I’m supposedly in the 140s and I am confident I am middle of the pack (at best) intelligence on xo xo is not as smart as it was but it is still very smart |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 2:36 PM Author: Bateful casino voyeur “145 is 1 in 1000 I don’t think many poasters today would reach that although 1 or 2 might”
still, 25-50% of xo possessing a 1-in-1000 trait is pretty respectable. |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 2:44 PM Author: Chestnut arousing resort If we are all at $600k HHI, 6'2, and played "a little ball in college" it's totally possible we are all also >130 IQ.
Regardless, buttcheeks is and has always been an insufferable fag. |
|
Date: October 6th, 2025 2:37 PM Author: confused cheese-eating point (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5783627&forum_id=2Ã#49329509) |