The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Ninth Circuit says Trump can use OR National Guard
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:34 PM Author: nighttime gas station ceo lol.
https://x.com/AndrewKolvet/status/1980359504027087077
Andrew Kolvet @AndrewKolvet 🚨BREAKING: MSNBC Legal correspondent Lisa Rubin is visibly upset after learning that the 9th Circuit has just issued an emergency motion that authorizes President Trump to deploy the National Guard to Portland.
"We conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. Section 12406.
"We thus conclude that defendants are likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal."
The president has broad discretion to determine when and where to deploy the Guard. That doesn't make him a King, it makes him a constitutionally bound president. |
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:39 PM Author: swollen copper giraffe institution the slipthery slopth of discrethion, she lisped (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362337) |
 |
Date: October 20th, 2025 5:03 PM Author: bearded roast beef station (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362408) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:40 PM Author: Turquoise Diverse Stock Car Church imagine being stuck in a courtroom with lisa rubin, imagine the smell (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362343) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:41 PM Author: Domesticated point sweet tailpipe even the 9th Jerk-it Court of Shlemiels has abandoned the libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362349) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:42 PM Author: provocative self-centered market it's two trump judges, so wont last, but this was going to SCOTUS anyway, so at least its makes trump argument look more reasonable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362350) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:44 PM Author: nighttime gas station ceo and now SCOTUS can let the 9th Circuit opinion stay in place, taking heat off of SCOTUS.
|
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 4:59 PM Author: Domesticated point sweet tailpipe still, 10+ years ago the 9th was to the left of Trotsky (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362397) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 9:59 PM Author: Bossy idea he suggested school cr. Trump reversed that to some extent. I just checked and he appointed ten of its judges, with four of those ten being replacements for lib judges. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49363095) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 6:16 PM Author: provocative self-centered market lol en banc court already scurrying to action!
https://x.com/ewess92/status/1980379584295215476 |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 6:26 PM Author: nighttime gas station ceo tyft. i was unaware that you could en banc a review of a TRO or preliminary injunction. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 7:03 PM Author: haunting avocado mad-dog skullcap ape Libs are so fucking stupid it is unreal
https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2025/10/20/25-6268.pdf
Second, the district court erred by placing too much weight on statements the President made on social media. Oregon, 2025 WL 2817646, at *11. The district court interpreted President Trump characterizing Portland as "War ravaged," as the equivalent of the President "ignoring the facts on the ground." Id. As such, the district court relied on these statements to disregard other facts that do "reflect] a colorable assessment of the facts and law within a range of honest judgment." Id. (citation modified).
This was error for two reasons. For one, under Newsom, we consider whether the facts provide a colorable basis to support the conclusion that the executive branch is unable with regular forces to execute the law. Even if the President may exaggerate the extent of the problem on social media, this does not change that other facts provide a colorable basis to support the statutory requirements." For another, the President's social media post characterizing Portland as "War ravaged" may reasonably be viewed as a part of his assessment under § 12406(2)'s "rebellion" prong, which we do not reach. Id. |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 7:07 PM Author: nighttime gas station ceo USDC Judges: because i am over-reacting it follows that Trump is over-reacting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5788103&forum_id=2Ã#49362728) |