The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Kirk's debate with Cambridge feminist (vid)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 17th, 2025 6:55 PM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mvIktYig9Y
Some commenters said they lost respect for Kirk after this debate and he got a lot of backlash.
Thoughts?
The feminist is a 20-year-old British college (Cambridge) student, Kirk is 31 and has been a political activist for 13 years. |
Date: September 17th, 2025 6:58 PM Author: I pray to gahd that there's no further violence I only watched 30 seconds but she ripped him apart and drew applause in that time, around 4:30 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49279311) |
|
Date: September 17th, 2025 7:16 PM Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; Honestly, he does fine considering the fact that he’s spotting her at least 1.5-2 SDs of IQ. But this clip really underscores why this format was always so stupid and tailored to midwit brains and attention spans. They hit at least 5 different useful topics to explore and have to drop them and rush on to the next thing and there’s some dumb clock on the whole discussion. It’s annoying in the same way that Policy Debate is annoying and stupid ie a bad argument delivered in the cadence of the micromachines VO guy is a “point” when not refuted, even if the “loser” in the debate made one actual good point that refutes 8 of the “points” that the winners made. It was so hilarious and perfect that policy debate was destroyed by angry black girl teams screeching incoherently. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49279372) |
 |
Date: September 17th, 2025 7:42 PM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage Funny to call it an “IQ gap” when she's the one bringing stats, context, and actual arguments. He’s 31 with 13 years of media (political activism) training; she's 20 and still in college. If being older and practiced means higher IQ, that's xo's logic. This format just rewards whoever can spit out the more info, and he spits the same lines with more confidence cause it's always the exact same shit. If the debate were graded on answer quality, he'd be the sore loser. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49279503) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:39 AM Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,; I clearly stated that her IQ is 20-30 points higher. When you spot someone else points that means you give them an advantage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49280438) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:57 AM Author: prole 10yo with heartbreaking youtube channel (iq aficionado) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281201) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:19 PM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage You mean the guy who claimed her IQ is higher? Or me for replying? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281364) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:23 PM Author: prole 10yo with heartbreaking youtube channel thank you. i now feel safe in assuming your initial confusion was not just a rare reading comprehension mishap. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281377) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 1:00 PM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage (charles kirk) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281488) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2025 9:45 PM Author: prole 10yo with heartbreaking youtube channel (not oxford material) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49285523) |
|
Date: September 17th, 2025 7:57 PM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage Here are two examples:
Example 1:
Her: “So, for example, studies like the OECD's better life index show that women's life expectancy, education levels, professional achievements have risen in countries with higher gender inequality. So I would argue that what you're calling unhappiness is actually visibility because now we hear women expressing dissatisfaction whereas in the 50s we prescribed them valium and we lobotomized them”
His response:
“Um that's really rich. I didn't know women not to complain 50 years ago. That's funny. Um so we've always No, hold on a second. Why are suicide rates going up more for women? I think that encourage complaining materially women are killing themselves more. Why is that?”
Example 2:
Her: “So I also don't think that happiness is a very good metric, and neither do you because you think gay people shouldn't just pursue happiness by being gay. They have other moralistic considerations to be making. So I don't think smiles per capita is a particularly convincing way to measure whether or not we should encourage women to be autonomous. I think we should maximize agency within a fair system that has reasonable parameters because it's expedient, it's good for the economy, it's logical, it's the moral thing because if we can't prove the material harms, we shouldn't discourage it. And also, self-reported studies is a really flawed way to do psychology.”
Him:
"But women in the West are miserable, and they have cats and jobs, while women in Sub-Saharan Africa have kids and faith. Maybe there's a biological reason they're happier." |
|
Date: September 17th, 2025 7:59 PM Author: DELETE EVERY JEET You should have just married HATP and let him be your cuck husband while you kept fucking black guys who did anti semitic raceplay during sex (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49279570) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 11:11 AM Author: Real American (🐾👣) she just spammed her own rehearsed points doesn't listen while he's speaking, she's just scanning her notes and dives into another bit of gynocentric pilpul without regard to what he had to say everyone present at that "debate" can laugh at Charlie's last point about civilizational impact because their lives haven't started yet, all they know is semitic propaganda, most in that room will live under sharia law because weak men allowed women to unsex themselves and destroy Britain's future
they're chuckling at their own demise |
|
Date: September 19th, 2025 9:07 PM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage Unlike Kirk, who doesn’t recycle canned lines or dodge tough questions, yet still manages to implode his own arguments. Case in point: he claimed women are treated well in the U.S. because we’ve had a female VP. Tilly shot back that Rwanda has far higher female representation than most countries, including the U.S. Kirk then started flailing about whether Rwanda is Muslim or Catholic. When it turned out Rwanda isn’t Muslim, the whole thing collapsed because his entire point was built on facts that weren’t even true. What a fucking clown. God bless Amerikka, though. And the Muslim tangent made it even worse, it had zero relevance to the discussion, so dragging it in just exposed how desperate and clueless he really was. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49285422) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2025 10:31 PM Author: Real American (🐾👣) that actually favored Kirk lmao, it's RWANDA but he couldn't go "there" political correctness has completely strangled social discourse
it's a selfpwn to reference what the UN forced apes to do in Rwanda, as if they're culturally fit comparisons
perhaps he could have led with a different metric for female empowerment but c'mon the UK is a den of vipers of terminal wokeness where every definition of right and wrong thinking has been turned upside down, no one can debate fundamentalism |
|
Date: September 17th, 2025 8:02 PM Author: Real American (🐾👣) lmao never answered a single question like she was in a senate hearing she'll quietly retire from her profession in her late 20s after finding a well off man, have one child and be happy as an influencer who writes an occasional birdbrain op ed for the local paper |
|
Date: September 17th, 2025 10:19 PM Author: ;..........,,,...,,.;.,,...,,,;.;. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49280076) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:42 AM Author: I pray to gahd that there's no further violence IDK she could get shot and killed with a big fast bullet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49280445) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:06 AM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage State your IQ. Then review this analysis of the debate, come back and confirm if your brain short circuited:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRLV5Is-Pc4 |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:59 AM Author: Real American (🐾👣) I bet she really appealed to the redditor in you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281207) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 7:44 AM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage Here's a good analysis of the debate by a Youtuber, with 869k views in just a month:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRLV5Is-Pc4 |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:01 AM Author: charismatic violent lowlife fan stage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281116) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:09 AM Author: AZNgirl assassinating Paralegal Chen she was getting wet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281129) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:13 AM Author: Judas Jones Overall she was better than Charlie, but looked pretty stupid trotting out "Actually, women in Sweden and other countries with more gender equality are happier than in America" after mocking self-reported happiness studies. I'm still in love with her tho, she's adorable. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281133) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:22 AM Author: mountain cat She gave the best lib answer to “what is a woman” that I’ve seen though I’m sure tons of more extreme libs would argue she should be fired or canceled for suggesting that there is any biological aspect of womanhood. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281144) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:27 AM Author: Judas Jones She used the exact definition that he gives as a response when he uses that canned schtick college campus question "What is a Woman?" to shitlibs. He looked stupid trying to introduce it to the debate here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281150) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:38 AM Author: mountain cat I don’t mean to speak ill of the dead, but Charlie Kirk’s debate style, irrespective of the positions he takes, is one that annoys the shit out of me. Assume the role of question asker and demand your opponent either agree with you or adopt a narrow position in an artificial vacuum youve created (I.e asking if women 50 years ago were happier as though the only thing that occurred in that time period was the emergence of feminism). She responded perfectly and Kirk was so flustered he started to argue that women living in sub-Saharan Africa are better off than women in the west. He did the same thing with Bill Maher when Maher asked if he was in favor of the legalization of pot. Kirk didn’t answer but asked is San Francisco better or worse now than 10 years ago with the unsupported inference being that legalizing marijuana caused a homeless epidemic.
The style is for someone who has no interest in having a discussion and instead wants to create setups to land his punchlines. Jordan Peterson does this too. |
|
Date: September 19th, 2025 10:18 PM Author: charles XII But Women actually are unhappy because of feminism. To argue otherwise is intellectually dishonest imo. They don’t get the same satisfaction from work that men do. So many Woman I know of are miserable or terrible at their jobs.
Also she says there’s a social component to women being nurturers when it’s literally the most biological thing that there is. And he has one hand tied behind his back because “genetics, champ” is the correct answer to everything but looks bad if it’s your answer to everything. The empirical “are things worse now” works better on normies imo.
He looks tired and isn’t being Lit. He was also being threatened privately by Bill Ackman while this was going on. The light hits her and she talks fast and has a British accent. If this were a Film about Kirk being Bad this is how you’d stage it. |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 10:33 AM Author: this moniker is available for lease, rent, or sale Kirk was brilliant at dunking on the average US college student. Oxford students are operating at a completely different level. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281157) |
|
Date: September 18th, 2025 12:21 PM Author: ;..........,,,...,,.;.,,...,,,;.;. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49281371) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2025 9:12 PM Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., Kirk destroyed the Oxford students including the now Oxford Union president elect (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776840&forum_id=2в�â#49285428) |
|
Date: September 19th, 2025 9:31 PM Author: "''"'''"""''' holy shit he was really bad at this lol
never saw him debate before |