at least fuentes actually believes in something. by "actually" i mean (1) his convictions are sincere and (2) knowledgeable. karlstack doesn't believe in anything. he's like a poli-sci freshman whose ideology changes every time he reads about a new one. he's one wikipedia skim away from changing course on anything.

fuentes is, at least to some, entertaining and intelligent. he's not me cup of tea personally, but you can't argue with results. karlstack has never struck anyone as (intentionally) entertaining or intelligent. he's floated between various rightwing spaces and never once, ever, has anyone found him insightful or funny.

nick fuentes got canceled and still clung to his beliefs and has amassed a following so significant it's frequently mentioned in the msm. karlstack does ideological 180s over individual substack subscriptions and in his most recent interview the host repeated 10000x "this is long" and "i haven't read all of this." even karlstack himself couldn't remember his top 5 fuentes gotchas.

there isn't a single person on earth, including karlstack, who has read and internalized an entire karlstack article.

i choose nick fuentes and there's really no intelligent argument otherwise. and i align more with karlstack ideologically.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5776525&forum_id=2в#49279600)