The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
scientists watching instellar objects may as well be studying particles of dust
| honey-headed party of the first part | 11/07/25 |
| cruel-hearted hell idiot | 11/07/25 |
| provocative crimson range mediation | 11/07/25 |
| honey-headed party of the first part | 11/07/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 7th, 2025 9:05 PM Author: honey-headed party of the first part take a random sample of dust and look at all the crazy shit that in it. All the organic and inorganic molecules, each with their own nutty properties. There might be some microscopic grains of sand that are older than the sun.
It's no different when you look into space, it's just a lot harder to see anything in space because it's dark and everything is far away. The better we are able to track interstellar objects, the more wild shit we're gonna see. You don't need "aliens" to explain ANY of it any more than you need them to explain dust. |
 |
Date: November 7th, 2025 9:15 PM Author: cruel-hearted hell idiot Let me $pell this out for your failed brain:
(I) WE HAVE A CONTROL GROUP.
His name was 2I/Borisov.
He was BORINGLY NORMAL.
He looked just like your "du$t."
He proved our "comet" model works perfectly fine.
(II) WE HAVE A PATTERN. 1I/'Oumuamua and 3I/Atlas (2 of 3) are the SAME KIND OF WEIRD.
They BOTH have the thrust-without-a-tail anomaly.
This is NOT "random wild $hit."
This is a specific, REPEATED failure of your cherished "comet" model.
(III) And THEN, you pull out the "aliens" $trawman becau$e you're too $tupid to confront the actual data.
The point isn't "it's aliens!!!!" The point is that your beloved "traditional comet" model is DET.
It CANNOT explain the data. The data points to indu$trial-grade nickel, non-random orbits, and impo$$ible propulsion.
You're the one telling Galileo it'$ ju$t "weird du$t" on his len$.
You my friend, yo uare the Inqui$itor. $top poa$ting. |
Date: November 7th, 2025 9:06 PM Author: provocative crimson range mediation What do you think you are looking "out" of when you look anywhere
What do you think you are looking "in" to when you view through a lens |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 9:08 PM Author: honey-headed party of the first part (Galileo's inquisitor) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794783&forum_id=2в#49411325) |