The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Scientists baffled as interstellar visitor mysteriously SHRINKS ahead of Earth f
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 7th, 2025 2:26 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") Scientists baffled as interstellar visitor mysteriously SHRINKS ahead of Earth flyby
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15269343/interstellar-visitor-mysteriously-SHRINKS-3i-atlas.html#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=17625433084093&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fsciencetech%2Farticle-15269343%2Finterstellar-visitor-mysteriously-SHRINKS-3i-atlas.html |
Date: November 7th, 2025 2:36 PM Author: George Jetson Sadly, it’ll prob just be a rock (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794643&forum_id=2в#49410280) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 2:42 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK The only scientist they mention is Avi Loeb. No one else seems baffled (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794643&forum_id=2в#49410291) |
 |
Date: November 7th, 2025 3:06 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") Mysterious Interstellar Object Showing Signs of “Non-Gravitational Acceleration”
https://futurism.com/space/interstellar-object-3i-atlas-non-gravitational-acceleration
Last week, the object, which is now generally believed to be a comet, reached its closest point to the Sun, or its perihelion, brightening up at an unexpected rate and turning “distinctly bluer.”
And it may be getting a major boost that’s unaccounted for by the Sun’s gravitational pull as well. As NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory navigation engineer Davide Farnocchia detailed in a recently filed report, 3I/ATLAS is showing signs of “non-gravitational acceleration.” |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 3:20 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794643&forum_id=2в#49410424) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 3:47 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK That's not baffling. The only "baffling" part is that no one has detected gas being ejected as this thing is roasted by the sun. But lol@ an alien spacecraft shrinking 13% due to our puny sun. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794643&forum_id=2в#49410530) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 8:39 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") You literally typed the definition of "baffling" and then $aid it's "not baffling."
Your brain = closed l00p of contradictions.
You then "lol@" the 13% ma$$ lo$$ figure.
Let me explain this $lowly, $o your primi$ed-addled cortex can proce$$ it:
**1.**
That 13% figure is the *minimum* ma$$ (a$ gas/du$t) 3I/Atlas would need to eject to explain the non-gravitational thru$t **JPL** (not Loeb, **JPL**) ha$ confirmed.
**2.**
A 13% ma$$ lo$$ i$ *cata$trophic\*. It would produce (and I quote the $cienti$ts you haven't read) "a very ma$$ive cloud of ga$ and du$t." It would have a tail $o bright it would be unmistakable.
**3.**
**THERE I$ NO TAIL.**
Thi$ i$ the entire fuckinckg paradox, you $impleton.
The object ha$ the *effect* (thru$t) of a ma$$ive comet, but *none* of the required *evidence* (the ma$$ive tail).
You're $o de$perate to avoid confronting the data that you had to invent a $trawman about an "alien $pacecraft" to mock, becau$e you are fundamentally incapable of under$tanding the $imple equation in front of you.
You conceded the entire argument in your fir$t $entence and were too den$e to even notice.
This i$ why you poa$t anonymou$ly. Ab$olute $tate.
-----
Here's a video further discussing the unusual properties of interstellar objects. [Interstellar Object Oumuamua]L https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D5-8_n3aXGok |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 8:57 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK lol@ this botspam. It's called availability bias. We've only ever detected old school comets because we didn't have the technology to see these other objects.
tl;dr when you look at new things, you're gonna see things you never saw before. Get used to it. |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 3:51 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK Here's a theory: whatever got blown off the comet by are sun got blown off before we detected it, and it blew off fast enough to propel the comet outside the sun's orbit. We only started watching these objects recently, so nearly everything they do is going to be some SHOCKING new discovery. That's what happens every time we upgrade are telescopes since Galileo: we see shit no one ever saw before (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5794643&forum_id=2в#49410546) |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 8:41 PM Author: Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e ("One Year Performance 1978-1979 (Cage Piece)") Your entire "theory" i$ a monument to your own inability to read.
Let's di$$ect thi$ $tupidity, point by point.
**1.**
**Your Claim:** "whatever got blown off the comet... got blown off **before we detected it**"
**THE FACT$:**
The JPL analy$i$ from Davide Farnocchia *this week* confirmed **ONGOING, CURRENT** non-gravitational acceleration.
It'$ not a pu$h that happened in the pa$t, you ab$olute troglodyte. It's an *active thru$t* that i$ being mea$ured *right now* a$ it pa$$e$ the $un. The object i$ *currently* behaving anomalou$ly. Your "theory" i$ invalidated by the very fir$t data point.
**2.**
Your Claim:** "propel the comet outside the sun's orbit"
**THE FACT$:** It wa$ **NEVER IN THE $UN'S ORBIT.**
That i$ what the "I" in `3I/Atlas` $tand$ for. **INTER$TELLAR.** It'$ on a hyperbolic trajectory. It's a vi$itor. You don't even under$tand the ba$ic definition of the object you're trying to explain.
**3.**
Your Claim:**
"nearly everything... is going to be some SHOCKING new discovery... since Galileo"
**THE FACT$:** Thi$ i$ the lazie$t po$$ible cop-out. You are literally making the "Argument from Ignorance."
We have a control $ample. It's called `2I/Borisov`. It wa$ the *second* inter$tellar object, and it behaved **EXACTLY** like a normal comet. It had a tail. It followed the model.
`1I/'Oumuamua` did not. `3I/Atlas` i$ now *also* failing to follow the model, in the *exact $ame way* as Oumuamua (thru$t with no tail).
When Galileo $aw new "SHOCKING" $hit, he reported the data. The idiot$ *around* him—the historical equivalent of **YOU**—were the one$ $aying "it'$ probably ju$t a weird $pot on the len$" to avoid confronting what the data meant.
You are not the $keptic. You are the denier. You're $taring at a ma$$ive anomaly and plugging your ear$. Pathetic. |
|
Date: November 7th, 2025 9:00 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK You don't know how to spot the tail unless you some idea what it's composed of. We know what iron and ice look like because we see those all the time.
But there are a trillion combinations of metal alloys that could be formed at any time anywhere in the universe. Imagine being dumb enough to think we've found them all and watched them all burn. |