Was there a single non-lib who was offended by Redskins or Indians name?
| 180 address | 08/18/25 | | excitant nighttime goyim hairy legs | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | laughsome national | 08/18/25 | | laughsome national | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | laughsome national | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | marvelous purple abode | 08/18/25 | | histrionic bright half-breed field | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | Balding big stock car forum | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | Balding big stock car forum | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | Balding big stock car forum | 08/19/25 | | 180 address | 08/19/25 | | laughsome national | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | Balding big stock car forum | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | bateful violet roommate institution | 08/18/25 | | drab concupiscible prole orchestra pit | 08/18/25 | | Bonkers fluffy point tank | 08/18/25 | | drab concupiscible prole orchestra pit | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | rusted hairraiser senate boiling water | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | irradiated pervert | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 | | laughsome national | 08/18/25 | | laughsome national | 08/18/25 | | aromatic deer antler | 08/18/25 | | Bonkers fluffy point tank | 08/18/25 | | 180 address | 08/18/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 18th, 2025 2:22 AM Author: Balding big stock car forum
A couple of them are okay
The one with the ridiculous caricature was not really necessary. Braves? I don't remember. The Seminoles have the right idea, fierce native warrior guy, and it's more appropriate for a sports team than the kewpie doll Chief Firewater guy anyway
The Land of Lakes woman and Aunt Jemima/Uncle Ben were probably two of the worst examples of needless removals of inoffensive American portrayals of ethnics imo
I have spoken with res natives unreconstructed by liberal grievance politics and feelings are usually mixed but tend to be positive for most teams' portrayals as long as there's an attempt to be respectful about the source material, which seems like a fair enough compromise to me.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763578&forum_id=2в#49193693) |
Date: August 18th, 2025 10:07 AM Author: drab concupiscible prole orchestra pit
for a well-done historical account of the term "Redskin," which basically supports the based view and the view of most Native Americans (ie, the anti-woke view), here is a somewhat long paper (18 pages) done by a scholar for the Smithsonian.
https://repository.si.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/dd62ae46-b6b5-4afb-b119-e16b02f72361/content
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763578&forum_id=2в#49194165) |
Date: August 18th, 2025 10:26 AM Author: rusted hairraiser senate boiling water
The real question is why would pro-Manifest Destiney MAGA types would be so adamant on keeping Native American mascots that "honor" their traditions and history of so called savages
We gave them smallpox blankets, drove them off their lands, and forced mass suicides through alcohol poisoning. We won.
So why remember these dead losers? As Trump says, he prefers to honor people who aren't losers
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5763578&forum_id=2в#49194206) |
|
|