\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Crappy Film CGI is worse than any “AI slop”

...
fantasy-prone milky parlor
  07/01/25
trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is r...
Charismatic thirsty locale psychic
  07/01/25
Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. ...
fantasy-prone milky parlor
  07/01/25
James Bond surfing in die another day
Garnet talented church
  07/01/25
Not even as bad as you’d think
fantasy-prone milky parlor
  07/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:13 AM
Author: fantasy-prone milky parlor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49062617)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:37 AM
Author: Charismatic thirsty locale psychic

trying to watch something from early 2000s with bad CGI is ruinous. This is why practical effects are necessary. While the FX from 80s monster movies have definitely aged they are at least still watchable and appreciable for the craft that went into them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49062648)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:28 AM
Author: fantasy-prone milky parlor

Even Star Wars prequels looked kind of dodgy in some spots. Good CGI isn’t even that expensive. Westerners just suck at making things efficiently. District 9 looked impressive iirc and it had a lowish budget iirc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49063141)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2025 8:44 AM
Author: Garnet talented church

James Bond surfing in die another day

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49062660)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 1st, 2025 11:24 AM
Author: fantasy-prone milky parlor

Not even as bad as you’d think

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5744889&forum_id=2#49063133)