The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Not a lawyer but why "turn over" incriminating shit during "discovery"?
| sinister exciting whorehouse masturbator | 07/02/25 |
| fishy tanning salon | 07/02/25 |
| sinister exciting whorehouse masturbator | 07/02/25 |
| Big tank native | 07/02/25 |
| Maroon arousing corner stain | 07/02/25 |
| glittery ebony locale ladyboy | 07/02/25 |
| Mustard temple hairy legs | 07/02/25 |
| concupiscible fuchsia main people quadroon | 07/02/25 |
| fishy tanning salon | 07/02/25 |
| ungodly forum stock car | 07/02/25 |
| Sexy gaping jewess | 07/02/25 |
| Lascivious brunch juggernaut | 07/02/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:08 PM Author: sinister exciting whorehouse masturbator The other side doesn't have it and doesn't know it exists, just don't give them the incriminating shit lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066970) |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: fishy tanning salon any big enough law firm is going to require that it have access to the clients files and will run search terms, etc. no point in an attorney refusing to turn it over even if the client doesn't want to. and theres going to be some degree of discovery on discovery/preservation efforts made. on a smaller level im sure it happens all the time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066974) |
 |
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:14 PM Author: sinister exciting whorehouse masturbator Ok hide it and then if the opposition somehow finds it you can play dumb and in that case ur furked anyway so game theory says ur best bet is to not voluntarily hand it over (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066988) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM Author: Big tank native ome weird trick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066975) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:26 PM Author: Maroon arousing corner stain winning isn't winning if it costs you your law license edit. i might have to rethink this |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:42 PM Author: glittery ebony locale ladyboy lol at it ever costing you your law license. Worst case is maybe getting your complaint/answer struck but that would be after multiple orders. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067042) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:43 PM Author: Mustard temple hairy legs Enjoy hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067043) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:55 PM Author: concupiscible fuchsia main people quadroon This is why associates have a "bad docs" tag -- those are collected and sent to the partners so they can brainstorm reasons not to produce them, while the other 2 million pages of trash get produced.
The associates can later say they tagged it for further review and the partners can say "I thought this already got produced" if it ever surfaces through a third party or whatever. |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:04 PM Author: fishy tanning salon "hot docs" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067246) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:05 PM Author: ungodly forum stock car "i don't think this document is even responsive!" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067249) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:23 PM Author: Sexy gaping jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067291) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:35 PM Author: Lascivious brunch juggernaut Technically, it's not incriminating if it's not produced. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067318) |