The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Leiter's anti-top-14 rant . . .
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:46 PM Author: Bateful narrow-minded sweet tailpipe ratface http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2006/03/from_the_bowels.html
"Here's the bizarre part: the only rationale for this grouping is that all these schools have been ranked in "the top 14" by U.S. News and World Report since roughly the early-to-mid-1990s!"
I think that the more likely rationale is that these are the schools with truly national placement. Or could it be that no rational grouping of top schools would include a school that would hire an asshole as big as Leiter? |
 |
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:47 PM Author: magenta aggressive partner It's Leittter. What did you expect? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377746) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:47 PM Author: Fragrant wine voyeur resort "I think that the more likely rationale is that these are the schools with truly national placement."
Um, no, actually the reason why they're the T14 is because they've always been the "Top 14," whatever that's supposed to mean. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:50 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker You're an incredible idiot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377781) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:51 PM Author: Fragrant wine voyeur resort O RLY? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377785) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:53 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker Yep. t14 is a USN designation but it also reflects the fact that those 14 schools have truly national placement and have held this position consistently. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377806) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:54 PM Author: Fragrant wine voyeur resort NO WAI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377813) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:55 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker You think you're pretty funny and clever, don't you? Keep posting idiotic internet slogans and ignoring all rational posts, you fucking idiot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377822) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:57 PM Author: Fragrant wine voyeur resort O RLY? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377841) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:59 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker moron. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377854) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:11 PM Author: walnut talented crackhouse faggotry You're a douche. Kill yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378491) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:14 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker hi "90210markII"! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378519) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:18 PM Author: Ivory galvanic milk you're a douche. kill yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378560) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:52 PM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film Oh, hello Brian. For a second, when I clicked on your "carelessly designed and gameable rankings" link, I thought it had taken me to your own law school rankings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377799) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:48 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus He doesn't like top 6 or top 3 either. Jerk. :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377752) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:48 PM Author: Ruby state chad "Here's the bizarre part: the only rationale for this grouping is that all these schools have been ranked in "the top 14" by U.S. News and World Report since roughly the early-to-mid-1990s!"
Yeah, that's the only reason. Whatever you say Brian... |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:50 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker LOL (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377776) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:52 PM Author: Ruby state chad Another gem.
"Rankings--even carelessly designed and gameable rankings like U.S. News--can provide genuine information; but they provide nothing but naked misinformation (misinformation that may damage careers and lives) when they turn into literally meaningless categories like "top 14" and "third tier.""
Yeah, lives have been ruined because the T14 concept has caused people to turn down Texas for GULC. Whatever. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:53 PM Author: magenta aggressive partner lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377811) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:54 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker I chose a t14 over a tier three because of US News and now my life is ruined. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377815) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:59 PM Author: Ruby state chad Every single day I cry myself to sleep because I took Penn over Temple w/ money. If only those damn rankings hadn't been there to feed me misinformation!!!!!!!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377853) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:00 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker I nearly shot myself when I read Leiter's blog and saw that rankings don't mean anything. And to think I would get a better job out of a t14 than Quinipiac!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377859) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:17 PM Author: Internet-worthy grizzly space community account how actionable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377991) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:00 PM Author: hairraiser bossy university So it's ridiculous to say top 14, but "top 15"? No problem:
"It is conventional wisdom that there are 15 top law schools, with a few others (UCLA, USC, perhaps Vanderbilt) on the cusp, and then a drop-off in quality and reputation"
|
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:03 PM Author: jade forum french chef Priceless (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377884) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:04 PM Author: Ruby state chad What's even funnier is that those same rankings he claims disprove the concept of the T14 also disprove the concept of a T15. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377894) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:05 PM Author: sinister impertinent boistinker Leiter is such an idiot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377902) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:03 PM Author: Submissive market Clearly, Leiter's life and career has been damaged by this distinction. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377889) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:55 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus "In the real world of lawyers, judges, and law professors, it is conventional wisdom that there are 15 top law schools, with a few others (UCLA, USC, perhaps Vanderbilt) on the cusp".
Why isn't 15 from the "real world" just as arbitrary than the 14 from the "unreal world"?
|
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:55 PM Author: Obsidian geriatric plaza Philosophy, dude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377823) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:57 PM Author: Ruby state chad What's funny is that multiple law school admissions guidebooks explicitly reference the T14 concept, like Susan Estrich's book and Anna Ivey's guide. It's not like it's some internet-only thing, and it's not like it's exactly new. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377835) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:36 AM Author: Fiercely-loyal bawdyhouse WHere did the Top 14 as an expression first start being widely used? I remember it on the old PR Board (I'm old, I have had many different user names).
Is that where it first started being commonly used? |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:52 AM Author: Ruby state chad Yeah. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379226) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:17 PM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film It is pretty halarious to assert a "conventional wisdom" where none exists. Every person--judge, lawyer, professor, or student--I've EVER heard refer to top schools has used the terms "top fourteen," "top five," or "top ten."
I guess it wouldn't surprise me if people at Texas use the "top fifteen" phraseology, as it would be self-serving to link themselves with top schools. Perhaps Leiter has just taken an anecdote that applies to his own life and assumed it must also be true elsewhere. If that's the case, it's truly amazing that this guy has a job. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:46 PM Author: Ocher pocket flask Bullshit people in practice said top 14. They would say top 5, top 10, and top 20, but not top 14. not saying that top 14 isn't valid, I completely think it is, but you are BSing when you claim judges, professors, and lawyers say top 14. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378811) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:49 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria Read below: Leiter himself uses top 14. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378828) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:54 PM Author: Ruby state chad I've heard Top 14 used many times in person by students, administrators, professors, etc., and it's also appeared in several published law school guides. It's not exactly an obscure term. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378877) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:38 AM Author: Fiercely-loyal bawdyhouse Really? People actually say "Top 14" - doesn't that show they post here? I know I would never admit to posting here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379132) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:01 AM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film The term existed long before xoxo. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379288) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:16 AM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film You might want to re-read my post. I didn't say that they commonly said "top fourteen." Rather, I listed three phrases that I believe to be far more common among practioners and students alike than "top fifteen." Two of those phrases were two of the three that you mention.
My point, which was quite clear, was that there is no conventional wisdom in favor of "top fifteen." |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 11:20 PM Author: Ocher pocket flask Yeah, and reread my post as well. My only point was that "top 14" as used by practioners is rare. That was all. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5386042) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:01 AM Author: brindle puppy hell I agree. Lawyers say top 5 and top 10, not top 15. Though they may think different T14 schools are T10. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379904) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:28 PM Author: Amber federal national (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382918) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 1:55 AM Author: brindle puppy hell Yeah, I clarified the post.
I think people have different definitions of what is a "Top 10" school, but most will probably fall within that category in at least some people's minds. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:58 PM Author: aromatic ruddy temple elastic band Subject: I totally ignored the T14 I totally ignored the petty T14 law school rankings by USNews when applying to law school.
I applied to a wide variety of schools based on my own research available from the ABA and additional reported statistics from the schools themselves along with indpendant third parties.
I don't care about rankings. I cared only about my future as a lawyer. I looked for schools which would place me in spots that would make for a lucrative career and perhaps interesting career.
I also valued the actual quality of teaching faculty and student quality - again completely ignoring rankings.
Imagine my surprise as my acceptances started to roll in and other law applicant geeks would say 'wow thats a T14 school'. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:00 PM Author: Ruby state chad "I don't care about rankings. I cared only about my future as a lawyer. I looked for schools which would place me in spots that would make for a lucrative career and perhaps interesting career."
How were you able to determine this? |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:02 PM Author: aromatic ruddy temple elastic band Subject: that was failed internet sarcasm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377879) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:12 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus I wonder why comments are disabled. Comments are enabled on other posts. See, e.g., http://leiterlawschool.typepad.com/leiter/2006/02/national_and_re.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377950) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:57 PM Author: laughsome lay Even though they're enabled in the other posts he still hand screens them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382658) |
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:52 PM Author: Obsidian geriatric plaza I almost forgot why Brian Leiter hates us. And then I glanced at the top of the page and found a useful link explaining why he hates us. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377802) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:53 PM Author: purple odious orchestra pit That dipshit needs to keep up with the times. We killed that "sweet 16" nonsense a while ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377812) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 9:59 PM Author: Mustard arousing rehab factory reset button My god, this guy's obsession with law school rankings is even more absurd than this board's.
He opens with this line pronouncing the existence and validity of a Top 15: "In the real world of lawyers, judges, and law professors, it is conventional wisdom that there are 15 top law schools, with a few others (UCLA, USC, perhaps Vanderbilt) on the cusp, and then a drop-off in quality and reputation (though not necessarily in national placement)."
And then closes with this gem: "Rankings--even carelessly designed and gameable rankings like U.S. News--can provide genuine information; but they provide nothing but naked misinformation (misinformation that may damage careers and lives) when they turn into literally meaningless categories like "top 14" and "third tier."
So, Top 14 = literally meaningless categorie that may damage careers and lives. But Top 15 = truth? Okay.
What a pathetically self-conscious UT troll. I can't believe Chicago invited this guy to visit. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:01 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus It is disappointing that Chicago asked him to visit. I've always heard Chicago was this place where debate was open and vigorous, but always respectful. This is not what Leiter is all about. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377868) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:37 PM Author: Flesh lodge athletic conference I promise you, an elaborate, legendary PWNing is already in the works among certain students....
I can't say more, since we're always TWO SUBPOENAS AWAY from disaster here on XOXO. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:02 PM Author: Ruby state chad Yeah, it's lovely how he just throws out this idea about a T15 without any substantiation. Especially funny that several of those rankings he links to in his post call that T15 concept into question. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377877) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:19 PM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film Yeah, but you can leap over any logical fallacy with "conventional wisdom." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378019) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:42 AM Author: histrionic bistre pozpig rigpig i hate that leiter was invited by chicago as well. he is such a douche. i really hope that leiter does not get an offer from chicago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379166) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:09 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine Leiter makes a lot of sense. I agree with him. His rankings based solely on student body is also a much better, and seemingly more in the style of xo, ranking system. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377936) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:11 PM Author: Ruby state chad And yet they don't support his claim of a T15 at all (or at least not a T15 that includes Texas):
http://www.leiterrankings.com/students/2005student_quality.shtml |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:27 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine You're right about that. I just never liked the concept of t14, it seems too driven by xo. I think that there are like 7 or 8 top top law schools, then about 15-20 that are a step below, but still damn good. After that, its harder to differentiate and maybe it should be done on a regional basis. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378069) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:03 AM Author: brindle puppy hell Arguably defensible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379906) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:19 PM Author: Multi-colored brunch I always knew Fordham was top 20. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378566) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:28 PM Author: Aphrodisiac senate It is a top 20 school, reputation aside. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378638) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:44 PM Author: Multi-colored brunch oh fordham, if only you could reach 50% of your potential then i might actually attend you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378779) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:12 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus I'm happy he compiles lists of all sort. They are interesting.
He, on the other hand, is a big fricking prick. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:23 PM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film His faculty quality and faculty movers lists, though, are pure bullshit. He often doesn't know anything about the person he grades. I highly doubt he reads all of their work (or, in most cases, probably ANY of their work) before making one of his pronouncements. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378045) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:31 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus The faculty quality list is based on surveys sent to other faculty members. I think he does a decent enough job. He seems more open about his survey than US News. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378105) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:33 PM Author: Ruby state chad It's especially funny when he claims someone left the school when in reality they haven't at all. Like when he listed Geoffrey Hazard as a Hastings prof and not a Penn prof in his 2005 faculty rankings. And yet, in March 2006, on the Penn Law front page:
According to Professor Geoffrey Hazard, Kentucky's Assistant County Attorney Ballard may have violated ethical rules for lawyers prohibiting deception when he disguised his involvement in a letter that lead to the ousting of Judge Stewart. The Courier Journal (2/26/06). Article.
|
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:15 PM Author: purple odious orchestra pit http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=284778&mc=3&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5377972) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:21 PM Author: Thriller adulterous yarmulke brethren Why's this guy catch so much flak on here? He doesn't seem to be any douchier than the average poster, and he's certainly more successful. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378028) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:22 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus You haven't been around long enough. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378039) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:25 PM Author: Thriller adulterous yarmulke brethren I've been here almost two years. That seems like a pretty long time. What, did he do something a decade ago that people are still rankled by? It seems pretty silly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378057) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:30 PM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film Aside from the fact that he's an incredible fucking douche, he's a drooling moron. What more do we need? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378100) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:25 PM Author: hairraiser bossy university For one, it's probably not a good idea to do a study designed to assess "national placement power" of law schools that excludes DPW and STB while including Miller Nash and Stoel Rives. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378052) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:26 PM Author: Thriller adulterous yarmulke brethren Are you kidding? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378065) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:28 PM Author: hairraiser bossy university I wish I were: http://www.leiterrankings.com/jobs/2003job_national.shtml (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378077) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:29 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine Yeah that is a horrible study. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378089) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:31 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine Even putting Vault differences aside, can you really get a good idea of how a school places in New York based on how many associates it had go to Wachtell, Cravath or SullCrom? I think not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378107) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:37 PM Author: Ruby state chad Except it's even worse than that. See my post below -- he *completely* excluded Cravath and SullCrom associates, and only included Cravath/SullCrom partners. The only NY firm that had all its associates and partners in his dataset was Wachtell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378161) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:39 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine Now I'm really mad at that dood. Thank you for your study. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378170) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:28 PM Author: Internet-worthy grizzly space community account are you talking about that ranking that just chose 3 firms in each city? it's bizarre in the Vault context, but it depends what "national" means, i suppose. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378084) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:32 PM Author: hairraiser bossy university "but it depends what 'national' means, i suppose."
I guess, but he should have accounted in some way for the concentration of elite firms in some cities. You can't assess national placement power by including 5 Texas firms, 3 Seattle firms, 3 Atlanta firms, and only 3 from New York, which is by far the largest legal market (not to mention only 3 from Chi and 3 from DC).
|
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:48 PM Author: Ruby state chad That and he doesn't even examine all the lawyers at those 3 NY firms; he completely excludes all associates at Cravath and SullCrom. Wachtell, Cravath, and SullCrom is a very shitty sample as it is -- Wachtell, Cravath partners, and SullCrom partners is an even shittier one, especially when he includes partners and associates at the 5 Texas firms, 3 Seattle firms, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378242) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:59 PM Author: Vigorous violent casino circlehead He picked FIVE Texas firms?
What a douche. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:36 PM Author: Ruby state chad Don't forget the fact that his "study" completely excludes *ALL* associates at Cravath and SullCrom (those firms don't include associates in their Martindale listing, which is what he used).
So basically his NY dataset just includes Wachtell, and Cravath/SullCrom partners. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:37 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine Wow. I didn't know that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378157) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:38 PM Author: hairraiser bossy university Didn't know that. Awesome.
|
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:46 PM Author: Ruby state chad It's truly amazing. Those omissions, as well as his extreme oversampling of firms in TTT markets and his failure to account for regional preferences, explain why he gets very odd results like Columbia at #7 and NYU at #11. Basically this whole thing was constructed to make Texas look like it places far better than it actually does. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378227) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:06 AM Author: brindle puppy hell Columbia/NYU doesn't seem that strange, given that Columbia is more historicaly established, and that both will tend to focus on NYU as their home market (in addition to being the primary biglaw market overall.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379909) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:16 AM Author: Ruby state chad You're greatly underestimating the impact leaving out Cravath and SullCrom's associates had on these rankings. Let's use Columbia and Cravath as an example. I'm going to cite to Sullivan here instead of Leiter because Sullivan made his dataset publically available online, used the same methodology as Leiter, and I gathered data on Cravath from its website around the same time Sullivan got his data on Cravath from Martindale.
Sullivan's dataset has only 19 Columbia and 21 NYU grads working at Cravath: http://www.calvin.edu/admin/csr/students/sullivan/law/data.htm
Now go to http://www.cravath.com and use their attorney search to find out how many Columbia and NYU grads really work there. As of today, the search turns up 82 Columbia grads and 56 NYU grads.
Hmm, 19 vs. 82, and 21 vs. 56... and that's just the difference for Cravath! Throw in the lost SullCrom associates and the gap becomes even bigger.
Now, do you *really* think that didn't have an impact on Leiter (and Sullivan's) rankings? There's absolutely no way Columbia would only be #7 and NYU would only be #11 if Cravath and SullCrom had their entire firms counted, as Leiter did with every other firm in his study. |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:19 AM Author: brindle puppy hell I'm sure Leiter's survey is highly flawed. I'm just saying that self-selection alone would account for a more "regional" focus for both Columbia and NYU vs. other top 10 programs. I don't doubt that they could both place far more nationally, the grads just tend to stay in NYC for obvious reasons. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379926) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:28 AM Author: Ruby state chad I think you're misunderstanding the problem here. Most of the ranking was determined by taking the total # of lawyers they found at all those firms and then adjusting it per capita (he wasn't adjusting for regional preferences or anything like I did -- it was straight total laywers divided by total students).
You're right, Columbia and NYU have a more regional focus -- which is precisely *why* completely elimining Cravath and SullCrom's associates from the dataset makes Columbia and NYU appear very low ranked! In other words, Texas and other schools got the benefit of having all lawyers at their "regional" firms counted, while Columbia/NYU/Cornell/Penn and other schools that send most of their grads to NYC were at a very severe handicap, since most of the lawyers in two of their three "regional" firms were not counted at all.
Even if this exact same shitty methodology was used, but with the missing lawyers included, Columbia and NYU would be ranked much higher. If Columbia placement was measured as 1262 / 578 instead of 1162 / 578 (assuming 100 CLS alums at Cravath and SullCrom weren't counted), it would've made a pretty big difference (probably putting CLS at #4 or #5, which is where you'd expect it to be). |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 10:28 PM Author: Useless Maroon Stag Film (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378085) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:45 AM Author: Lascivious school "Why's this guy catch so much flak on here?"
He's the king of douches, and a total windbag. Rather than carrying on intellectual discourse he operates via ad hominem attacks and threats of lawsuits. This is disgraceful conduct, *especially* for a law school prof. Plus, he's full of crap on numerous levels. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:01 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria How can Leiter possibly say that the top 14 doesn't exist and is "literally meaningless"? Here, for example, is a very learned expert who says quite definitively that there is a "top 14" law schools.
This expert says that "Arguably competitive with the bottom end of the top 14 are such schools as Duke University, the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of Southern California."
So, according to this most learned and wise expert, there is in fact a "top 14."
In fact, this most wise and brilliant expert says that "For purposes of students thinking about teaching careers, the most important factor is the scholarly distinction of the faculty. There are some 180 accredited law schools in the U.S., but the top 14 law schools in terms of faculty quality are (in alphabetical order) the following:"
Who is this wise and brilliant expert who so devastatingly proves that Leiter is dead wrong when he denies the existence of the "top 14"?
Check it out:
http://www.philosophicalgourmet.com/2004/lawsch.htm
s3lf-pwn3d!
|
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:03 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine OMFG pwned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378399) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:04 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria Can I get a 180, or least a 174 on that one? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378416) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:05 PM Author: Bisexual dopamine 180+, it really is a great find. YOu should post it on the comments of his blog or write an email or something. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378430) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:07 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria For the record, in the anti-14 rant, Leiter concedes that UT is not one of the 14, but on his list of the top 14, UT is one of the 14. But, still, he goes to great lengths to deny the existence of 14 and to affirm the existence of the 15. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378455) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:18 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus How does his top 14 differ from US News? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378561) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:22 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria It has Texas, of course. Plus, it's faculty quality not overall quality. I don't know who he drops out of the 14 to get Texas in.
His schtik is so obvious. Top 14 is meaningless but top 15 is universally accepted. Who's missing from the top 14 as the rest of the world knows it? Texas. |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus I wonder who he kicked off. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378600) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:25 PM Author: Multi-colored brunch i thought he hated duke for some reason. maybe they're "on the cusp" with USC and UCLA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378612) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:26 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria Columbia University University of California, Berkeley Cornell University University of Chicago Georgetown University University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Harvard University University of Pennsylvania New York University University of Texas, Austin Northwestern University University of Virginia Stanford University Yale University
No Duke or UCLA |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:50 PM Author: Ruby state chad 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378844) |
|
Date: March 19th, 2006 11:52 PM Author: Motley school cafeteria Download that one, because he has to change it! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378861) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:02 AM Author: Burgundy Curious Wrinkle Dysfunction pwn3d. his hypocrisy rivals gto. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5378925) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:53 AM Author: startled soul-stirring heaven gaping 1-fucking-80 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379230) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:43 AM Author: twisted tanning salon You guys may not like him, and yes, he is an unbelievable ass, but that doesn't make everything he says wrong. He has a point here. The same 16 schools have been ranked in the top 16 slots, but that doesn't catch on. Why 14? Moreover, the US news rankings suck. They are a senseless mismash of different criteria. It is pretty sad that this ranking system, simply because it is a readily available ranking, has come to define a group of schools as being better than the ones below. Is there a precipitous drop in reputation or placement at 14? I really don't think so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379175) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:47 AM Author: Motley school cafeteria You can't say "top 14" is utterly meaningless and also claim that in real world everyone uses "top 15." Then when you think about why he switches from "absurd" to "universally accepted" when he moves from 14 to 15, you see that the only basis for his 180 degree switch is that his school now makes the list. It's pathetically transparent.
To top it, you go to his own site and see that he invokes the concept of a "top 14" repeatedly when it favors UT.
This guy, by the way, is supposed to be a philosopher. |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:55 AM Author: Ruby state chad "The same 16 schools have been ranked in the top 16 slots, but that doesn't catch on."
Except they haven't. The Top 14 has been in the same slots for something like 15 years, while this "Sweet 16" has only been intact for 5 or 6 years (if even that). Also, every school in the Top 14 has been in the Top 10 at one point, while none of the other schools have (in fact that's how the term originated -- the Top 14 is not the Top 14 because it's always been the Top 14 in US News, but because every school in the Top 14 is arguably a Top 10 school, while that's not the case for Texas, UCLA, etc.). |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:08 AM Author: brindle puppy hell I don't think Gtown has ever been in the top 10. Also, NU only got there recently, after the T14 phrase was coined. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379911) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:53 PM Author: Charcoal Racy Round Eye 1993 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382617) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 1:56 AM Author: brindle puppy hell Link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5387549) |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 1:40 PM Author: Disrespectful pink shrine place of business "this 'Sweet 16' has only been intact for 5 or 6 years (if even that)."
It's actually been in tact for 8 years (1999-2007).
The rest of your post is 100% true though.
|
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 12:55 AM Author: violet irradiated hissy fit mental disorder "Is there a precipitous drop in reputation or placement at 14?"
I think there is a real difference in placement between 14 and 15. There's certainly a significant difference between 14 and 20. |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:07 AM Author: cyan big nowag I don't think there is a big drop. Is SUNY Ithica, the third best law school in its city, really so much better than Texas as to warrant some type of cutoff distinction? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379319) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:10 AM Author: Ruby state chad By every objective measure that matters to students, yes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379332) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:17 AM Author: Burgundy Curious Wrinkle Dysfunction texas is a fucking ttt you homosexual troll. eat shit and live with the fact that your school sucks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379368) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:18 AM Author: marvelous stock car giraffe i didn't know Ithaca had 2 more law schools, each better than "SUNY-Ithica"! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379372) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:56 PM Author: cobalt magical den tank He's stuck in NYU-bash mode (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382646) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 2:03 AM Author: cyan big nowag Yeah, sometimes it's hard to keep all my trolling in order. I troll against NYU to justify choosing TTTexas over it, and I troll against Cornell because it is the most likely candidate to fall below TTTexas in the rankings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5387619) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:09 AM Author: brindle puppy hell You could debate UT, or even maybe UCLA, but I don't think USC or Vandy is really comparable to the top 10 schools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379914) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:20 AM Author: brass thirsty church building did leiter even go to texas? Didnt you go to Michigan? The douche lost all credibility when he threatened to sue us. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379378) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 2:16 AM Author: Sepia public bath pisswyrm us? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379596) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 9:55 PM Author: brass thirsty church building he threatened "subpeonas" for anyone insulting him here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5385424) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 10:01 PM Author: Sepia public bath pisswyrm subpoenas are perfectly real, and don't require quotations marks. and as most insults are protected speech, that's not exactly what he threatened. are you going to refuse to write a cease and desist letter that threatens subpoenas when the underlying action that's threatened is dubious? or is the sanctity of the "top-14" the only issue you care deeply about? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5385474) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 10:11 PM Author: brass thirsty church building you just took the life out of this entire thread. Enjoy hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5385549) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 12:13 AM Author: Sepia public bath pisswyrm no danger of this common enemy losing its allure here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5386523) |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 3:56 PM Author: Bearded base new version i know this reply is several months late, but this seems like a very odd post to me.
"are you going to refuse to write a cease and desist letter that threatens subpoenas when the underlying action that's threatened is dubious?"
this is what i don't understand. Leiter was not representing anyone except himself; there was no ethical obligation -- nor even profit motive -- to write the C&D's. so when he makes a particularly questionable threat, he deserves all the blame; there is no client whose interests he is bound to represent.
maybe i'm just not understanding your criticism. |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:19 PM Author: cobalt magical den tank moron (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382836) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:46 AM Author: brindle puppy hell I love how he retains the idea of a "Top 15", though, with Texas in the group.
CHEFHYPOCRITPWNED!!!! |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:46 AM Author: Silver Cruel-hearted Really Tough Guy "It seemed to be the operative premise in Justice Thomas's dissent in Grutter when he singled out Michigan, UVA, Boalt, and Texas as the top state schools"
I guess Justice Thomas is only a part of the "lunatic fringe" when he's not writing about law school rankings.
http://brianleiter.powerblogs.com/posts/1139002920.shtml |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:48 AM Author: Ruby state chad Ha, good find. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379879) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:49 AM Author: brindle puppy hell CHEFHYPOCRITPWNED!!!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379883) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:55 AM Author: Ruby state chad I wonder if that post was intended as a parody of himself. It just seems too absurd to be real given everything else he's written.
Then again, Leiter isn't exactly a bastion of consistency:
http://brianleiter.powerblogs.com/posts/1142728893.shtml |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:57 AM Author: brindle puppy hell It really does a good job of distilling his paranoia, hyprocricy, and obsession into a few short paragraphs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379901) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:46 AM Author: brindle puppy hell PS: It's sad he cited LSD for the T14 concept on the internet, and not XO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379871) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:47 AM Author: Silver Cruel-hearted Really Tough Guy he'd never cite this board after the tubgirl incident and why brian leiter hates us. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379874) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:49 AM Author: Ruby state chad Wouldn't be the first time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5379882) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 12:15 AM Author: Sepia public bath pisswyrm you actually find it "sad"? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5386547) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 1:52 AM Author: brindle puppy hell Tragic may be a better word. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5387503) |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 3:58 PM Author: Bearded base new version kind of pathetic, yes, that he bends over backwards not to acknowledge the board's existence when it is so clearly the source -- or at least the most zealous proponent -- of the offending schema (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#6515886) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 1:49 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus Unrelated, but interesting: http://rightreason.ektopos.com/archives/2005/07/if_i_were_brian.html
Leiter outs someone in the comments to a blog entry:
"Try 'former' friend. What happened to you, Steve? Does your ex, Scott--who was always the nice one--know that you've sunk to this level?
I always admired your philosophical acumen, and your contrarian views in aesthetics, and think it a travesty of our profession that you did not secure permanent employment in it. Posted by: BL at July 10, 2005 01:10 PM " |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 2:00 PM Author: Flesh lodge athletic conference What an insufferable asshole.
EDIT: I re-read it and now I genuinely HATE Brian Leiter. Previously I had a hearty, good-natured contempt for the man. Now I want to see this guy pwn3d when he comes to Chicago in the worst way. |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:32 PM Author: Burgundy Curious Wrinkle Dysfunction holy shit.
gto, you need to add this to 'why leiter hates us and why we hate him.' |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:33 PM Author: Silver Cruel-hearted Really Tough Guy omg, what a disgusting man. this is completely indefensible. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382433) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:20 PM Author: cobalt magical den tank Holy shit, what a fucking asshole (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382846) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:29 PM Author: Mustard arousing rehab factory reset button Jesus. What a complete asshole. This really gives weight to the title of the other UT prof's blog: "Brian Leiter, Academic Thug." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382923) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 12:52 AM Author: cobalt magical den tank Wow the whole comments section on that is fucking awesome. LeiTTTer is such a TTT (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5386940) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 1:57 AM Author: brindle puppy hell Wow, he didn't just out him -- he "outted" him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5387554) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 2:54 PM Author: Overrated Site Lettuce honestly, what the fuck is wrong with this guy? has anybody here taken a class with him who can comment on his in-class behavior? Just his employent alone at UT removes any chance of it ever making it into the top 14
|
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 9:51 PM Author: Maniacal native candlestick maker Curious that no one ever answers this query. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5385405) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:44 PM Author: Silver Cruel-hearted Really Tough Guy this incident and thread has made the anti-Leiter blog
http://brianleiter.powerblogs.com/posts/1142886513.shtml |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:22 PM Author: cobalt magical den tank I love xo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382854) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 3:57 PM Author: laughsome lay I didn't apply to Texas or Chicago because of Leiter. Don't these schools realize how much damage he does to their reputations? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382654) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:09 PM Author: Mustard arousing rehab factory reset button What the hell is wrong with this guy, seriously? He acts like a 6 year old. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382762) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:26 PM Author: Vigorous violent casino circlehead Most 6-year-olds aren't that vindictive. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382898) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 4:31 PM Author: bonkers light kitchen karate He left out one rationale for the T14 rationale that is wholly logical and morally justifiable: it turns TTTexas people red with sputtering rage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5382936) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 9:59 PM Author: Onyx nighttime coldplay fan I saw Leiter at the Chicago-Midway airport wearing a UChicago hat. I approached him to ask if he was Brian Leiter of the Univeristy of Texas and he responded by saying "Depends, do you believe in the myth of t14 or the truth of t15." He was totally erect during our interlude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5385458) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 10:41 PM Author: sable meetinghouse associate I really don't understand why he obsesses over the rankings of law schools so publicly when he works in academia, it must make him radioactive to anyone who wants to hire him, because with the exception of HYS, he's bashed all the T14 schools at one time or another.
|
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 10:44 PM Author: Sepia public bath pisswyrm perhaps GTO can explain the roots of this obsession. it is an odd thing to care deeply about (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5385801) |
|
Date: March 20th, 2006 11:24 PM Author: Dashing volcanic crater I think his major problem in academia is just that he has a remarkable way of personalizing the smallest dispute. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5386063) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 1:59 AM Author: cobalt magical den tank I think his major problem in academia is just that he's a prick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5387573) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 1:55 AM Author: cobalt magical den tank A+ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5387534) |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 11:30 AM Author: Comical Useless Brakes this made me laugh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#6514708) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2006 11:33 AM Author: Motley school cafeteria The anit-Leiter blog is asking if Leiter knows German. Anyone out there know? The answer has to be yes, because how can you get a doctorate on Nietzsche unless you read, write and speak German fluently? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#5389244) |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 12:00 PM Author: Bearded base new version http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brian_Leiter&offset=20060418163131&limit=500&action=history
GTO, what is leiter's IP address? I'd bet dollars to donuts that BL himself is a serious contributor to his own biography, which is a pretty big faux pas in wikipedia |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 1:49 PM Author: Passionate Black Pit Potus http://www.arin.net/whois/ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#6515199) |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 4:00 PM Author: Bearded base new version Search results for: brian leiter
No match found for brian leiter.
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2006-08-27 19:10 # Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database. |
|
Date: August 28th, 2006 4:02 PM Author: Heady locale idiot looking up 70.112.222.175 (the IP that keeps deleting things), we get a RoadRunner IP in Herndon, VA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=383101&forum_id=2#6515917) |