The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is computer-generated evidence hearsay? Like timestamps of ID card usage
| charismatic field | 03/24/17 |
| Coiffed spectacular step-uncle's house telephone | 03/24/17 |
| Smoky senate | 03/24/17 |
| charismatic field | 03/24/17 |
| Smoky senate | 03/24/17 |
| fluffy swashbuckling box office national security agency | 03/24/17 |
| aquamarine garrison prole | 03/24/17 |
| charismatic field | 03/24/17 |
| topaz fragrant parlor | 03/24/17 |
| wonderful ungodly chapel | 03/24/17 |
| misanthropic marketing idea striped hyena | 03/24/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:14 PM Author: charismatic field (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906833) |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:17 PM Author: Coiffed spectacular step-uncle's house telephone Most likely comes in under business record under the federal rules. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906869) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:18 PM Author: Smoky senate Probably but biz record exception. You'd more or less defeat the objection same time as u authenticate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906877) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:23 PM Author: charismatic field ty for responses -- part of me thinks they might not even be hearsay in the first place because they are not out of court statement by a human being (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906932) |
 |
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:28 PM Author: Smoky senate Neither is a bank statement or a cell phone bill but those are admitted as biz records. Either way u should be fine if this is for an irl issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906964) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:26 PM Author: fluffy swashbuckling box office national security agency There's a split of authority on this. There's an eleventh circuit case that says it is nonhearsay because there's no human to make a "statement." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906950) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:27 PM Author: aquamarine garrison prole remember when this was a law bort (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906955) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: charismatic field Law mastermen, consider this:
employees sign in and write down the time they sign in when they come to work. one of those employees sues employer for firing him. employer seeks to admit the sign in sheet to show that employee was tardy and regularly signed-in late. is the record of that employee's sign-in times nonhearsay because it's an admission by party opponent (the employee's signing-in is his own statement of time of arrival)? |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:31 PM Author: topaz fragrant parlor Of course it is. yw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907002) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:30 PM Author: wonderful ungodly chapel let me pull out my Barbri materials (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32906989) |
|
Date: March 24th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: misanthropic marketing idea striped hyena would've researched this in the past week but the case settled so i didn't have to (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3562918&forum_id=2#32907023) |