\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

The "planes" struck by Ukraine were decoys. Otherwise we'd have full nuke launch

the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit...
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25
r u an NSAM alt
mahogany associate legal warrant
  06/01/25
Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a s...
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25
yea
Razzle-dazzle menage
  06/01/25
It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber ar...
garnet set
  06/01/25
It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of ...
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25
cr
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25
What is the virtue in a proportional response?
dashing spot
  06/01/25
Putin is a Boomer
garnet set
  06/01/25
What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to ...
Razzmatazz Red Party Of The First Part
  06/01/25
He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were da...
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25
What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia g...
Razzmatazz Red Party Of The First Part
  06/01/25
(retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterr...
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25
lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear asse...
Diverse copper juggernaut
  06/01/25
Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO ...
Silver heaven knife
  06/01/25
They don't have decoy planes
flushed lay chad
  06/01/25
Link?
sexy cuckoldry hominid
  06/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:06 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

the lack of Russian nuclear retaliation after a supposed hit on its nuclear triad is telling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978827)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: mahogany associate legal warrant

r u an NSAM alt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978833)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:19 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

Nuclear superpowers at my HS declined to retaliate after a successful strike on their nuclear triad all the time; it was no big deal

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978858)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:35 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle menage

yea

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978902)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:29 PM
Author: garnet set

It appears to be a serious degradation of Russia's bomber arm, and there's no reason to think that Ukraine won't be able to do exactly the same thing in 6 months. Or to go after all civilian air travel.

Can Putin get away with just ordering an (ineffective) Oreshnik strike in retaliation for this? Can he get away with it again next time when Ukraine does exactly the same thing again?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978887)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:30 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

It doesn't appear to be that at all. And there is plenty of reason to believe they won't even be able to hit decoys next time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978891)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 2:53 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48978939)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:09 PM
Author: dashing spot

What is the virtue in a proportional response?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979298)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:14 PM
Author: garnet set

Putin is a Boomer

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979311)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:06 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Red Party Of The First Part

What would Putin nuke? The point of capturing Ukraine is to have it. It doesn’t make much sense to just bomb it out of existence

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979296)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:15 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

He should and would nuke NATO if real nuclear assets were damaged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979313)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Red Party Of The First Part

What would that accomplish other than ensuring that Russia gets nuked as well. You seem dumb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979315)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

(retard who's never heard of MAD doctrine and nuclear deterrence)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979324)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:18 PM
Author: Diverse copper juggernaut

lmao. So your position is that we know no real nuclear assets were damaged because Putin didn't start a war with NATO?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979316)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:20 PM
Author: Silver heaven knife

Still more coherent than Russia’s assertion that NATO helped Ukraine nuke Russia last year, Russia did nothing, and none of the nuclear detonation surveillance stations reported anything because of a conspiracy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979323)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:21 PM
Author: flushed lay chad

They don't have decoy planes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979327)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 1st, 2025 6:22 PM
Author: sexy cuckoldry hominid

Link?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732172&forum_id=2#48979329)