No one speaks in detail about the administrative mechanics of Roman imperial pol
| excitant olive site blood rage | 05/17/25 | | Buck-toothed snowy abode pistol | 05/17/25 | | excitant olive site blood rage | 05/20/25 | | Free-loading galvanic pit pervert | 05/20/25 | | excitant olive site blood rage | 05/20/25 | | excitant olive site blood rage | 05/20/25 | | excitant olive site blood rage | 05/20/25 | | Glittery lime stock car | 05/20/25 | | excitant olive site blood rage | 05/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: May 20th, 2025 6:44 PM Author: Glittery lime stock car
I have a couple of baseline questions:
1. Isn't this how the Achaemenids ran their empire? With a mobile capital that could move from place to place? It seems like the only thing Romans did differently was create written records.
2. Are the records any good? Most government records are dogshit, just as a baseline rule. The figures tend to be inaccurate and unreliable.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5726393&forum_id=2#48948692) |
|
|