i do realize that Epstein was a masterman at throwing parties and making powerful friends, and i realize that Trump was on the flight logs of Epstein's plane a half dozen times between Palm Beach and NYC. but i thought there was no evidence Trump had ever been to Epstein Island and that there was evidence that Trump cut off Epstein long before others did.

i could be wrong of course.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49097562)

*scribbles notes furiously*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49098630)

``In 2017, "a former senior White House official" reported that Alexander Acosta, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida who had handled Epstein's criminal case in 2008, had stated to interviewers of President Donald Trump's first transition team: "I was told Epstein 'belonged to intelligence' and to 'leave it alone'", and that Epstein was "above his pay grade".[57][58]``

Also the "list" people are talking about that so many of you are mocking could be something like a Flight Log which is supposed to exist per FAA Regulations according to Losers on the internet.

Libs who think Trump was going to the island and fucking teenagers are dumb imo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49097583)

Losers like me have known about the "Lolita Express" since like 2015.

The median con doesn't know about conspiracy theories beyond a surface level and doesn't realize that Israel runs the U.S. government. And since Trump can't explain this to them, the Epstein situation is damaging to cons and, by extension, the Republican caucus. Midterms loom over the horizon and the republican caucus deserves what's coming to it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49097607)

lol there is no "we" to do this. "we" are compromised. the voting base of trump is still boomer proles who watch fox news and default to "israel is our greatest ally despite a few bad apples". I mean these people are seriously stupid.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49097630)

https://x.com/CalltoActivism/status/1944421515040260487

is there a small group in the WH or CIA who are thinking that it's time for a modified, limited hangout about Epstein?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49097633)

1. As Scott Adams said, we've now had multiple organizations in different political parties look at this - and both thought it was too troubling to tell the public. So at this point, you maybe just have to accept that its best that the public just not know what actually happened.

2. The whole thing is sort of overblown and there really isn't that much more out there to find.

3. This really was a huge operation, but it was careful enough that no one can really unwind it any further.

I think in the end its probably like JFK where its a combination of 1-3. Like the JFK files were sealed for 50 years, and whenever they're released they *sort of* imply the CIA maybe had more involvement with Oswald than indicated, but its not like we ever get some secret doc where Johnson and the CIA ordered the hit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49099323)

Would't more girls come forward? I mean, SIXTY women accused Bill Cosby. Would't a few of these girls posted something on their Instagram page before killing themselves?

Wouldn't some of the many people who would've been somewhat involved say something?

Bill Gates ex-wife is teh only person who seems to imply there was more but she is never all that clear what she's saying happened.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49099412)

Could just as easily be Trump trolling dems like Obama trolled rapes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5749818&forum_id=2#49104742)