\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

🚨🚨Hawaii Judge MAF 🚨🚨

...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
any lawyers awake 6-3 scotus says fed dist ct enjoining exe...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
holy shit 180
Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested
  06/27/25
wowza
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
bistre yarmulke hell
  06/27/25
Nationwide injunctions still exist for states, though. Looks...
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
you talking abt discussion at end of B2 (p17-19)?
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
The complete-relief inquiry is more complicated for the sta...
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
...
multi-colored affirmative action
  06/27/25
You left out a critical part tho “The court has mad...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
thanks for the twitter link!
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwcXmQjVi3U&t=185s
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
i expected a video of a guy opening a twitter link about a b...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
https://x.com/andrewmgrossman/status/1938602878223937688 ...
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
Not sure if that will lead to a flood of litigation or curta...
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
...
Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life
  06/27/25
amazing
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
180
maroon stimulating international law enforcement agency
  06/27/25
ketanji patted on the head: We will not dwell on JUSTICE ...
Talented Bronze Stag Film Travel Guidebook
  06/27/25
holy shit SHOT ACROSS THE BOW at Dworkin’s Law’s...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
peach piazza ladyboy
  06/28/25
rofl
Bespoke Iridescent Tanning Salon
  06/27/25
...
ocher crusty haunted graveyard athletic conference
  06/27/25
...
elite crawly address
  06/27/25
the whole section on the jackson dissent is brutal The pr...
Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested
  06/27/25
Ahahahah take that nigger!
Fragrant buff rigpig
  06/27/25
gash in the basic tenets of our founding charter that could ...
contagious transparent school
  06/27/25
lol
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
The penumbral gash! The scholarly aperture! The juristic pen...
contagious transparent school
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
...
aromatic kink-friendly gas station
  06/27/25
...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
...
painfully honest foreskin business firm
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
...
obsidian cruise ship
  06/27/25
...
fear-inspiring electric furnace skinny woman
  06/28/25
o the soaring metaphor!
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
aromatic kink-friendly gas station
  06/27/25
...
contagious transparent school
  06/27/25
...
Glassy Plaza French Chef
  06/27/25
i do agree with her that we should eliminate all the gashes ...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
She’s not wrong that gash may be what brings down the ...
Twisted temple
  06/29/25
WOW
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
l m a o
Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe
  06/27/25
...
ocher crusty haunted graveyard athletic conference
  06/27/25
Lol didn’t some poaster say they made Barrett cry by s...
Comical flushed organic girlfriend
  06/27/25
...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficul...
ivory striped hyena pisswyrm
  06/27/25
...
painfully honest foreskin business firm
  06/27/25
...
Big zombie-like karate abode
  06/27/25
...
elite crawly address
  06/27/25
lol that marbury cite must be the closest the majority has c...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
...
Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested
  06/27/25
...
Fishy mother
  06/27/25
calls her lazy too: JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part....
Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested
  06/27/25
Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficul...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
Close enough to shave
Vigorous carnelian dog poop stead
  06/27/25
come on, you can't expect her to know every obscure 19th cen...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
cr dat old skool she new skool
histrionic unhinged jap
  06/27/25
...
ebony background story
  06/28/25
...
narrow-minded juggernaut toaster
  06/27/25
...
violent stock car
  06/27/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
...
painfully honest foreskin business firm
  06/27/25
...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
...
diverse mustard theatre
  06/27/25
...
beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter
  06/27/25
...
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/28/25
my God that woman might have a family
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
nigger fatigue
Boyish persian pit
  06/27/25
Is this the biggest smackdown on a fellow scotus justice eve...
excitant trust fund
  06/27/25
Yes
Crystalline Preventive Strike
  06/27/25
...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
How is any of this real
beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter
  06/27/25
it's not like any of this was 'gotcha' material. she could h...
trip pink ticket booth reading party
  06/28/25
GAPED
elite crawly address
  06/27/25
lol nigger
galvanic misunderstood doctorate center
  06/29/25
ouch
Fishy mother
  06/27/25
wait a second, is this what it looks like, actually a huge b...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
The issuance of a universal in- junction can be justified o...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
Wow it looks like it: Such injunctions are sometimes call...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
Can’t wait to see how Newsom uses this in 2029
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
Can he put it in his ass?
Fragrant buff rigpig
  06/27/25
Supreme Court holds 8-1 that he cannot (Roberts, CJ, dissent...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
roberts’ dissent contains but two lines, efficient and...
Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe
  06/27/25
...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
Twisted temple
  06/27/25
you mean the guy who set half of Los Angeles on fire a few m...
smoky sex offender
  06/27/25
Hawaii judge hastily crawling "except for in Loving Cou...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
district courts will just ignore this, hth
charismatic people who are hurt resort
  06/27/25
And Trump will just ignore them, hth
Fragrant buff rigpig
  06/27/25
no he won't, hth
charismatic people who are hurt resort
  06/27/25
You’re a jew with small wrists, hth
Fragrant buff rigpig
  06/27/25
wrong again, kikeboi
charismatic people who are hurt resort
  06/27/25
...
elite crawly address
  06/27/25
Remember after SCOTUS got rid of Chevron deference in their ...
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
classic loophole of incorporating as a united state just bef...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
...
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/27/25
Tp
Twisted temple
  06/27/25
...
Fishy mother
  06/27/25
...
Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe
  06/27/25
...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
...
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/27/25
...
violent stock car
  06/27/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
pierce that veil
Boyish persian pit
  06/27/25
*puts state inside an LLC*
Twisted temple
  06/29/25
...
beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter
  06/27/25
jfc the way Barrett treats Jackson -- "no one can under...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
Don't know if I've seen a scathing takedown like this outsid...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
Does this mean executive orders and federal regulations are ...
soul-stirring clown
  06/27/25
are you retarded?
charismatic people who are hurt resort
  06/27/25
No. Just want to understand the case.
soul-stirring clown
  06/27/25
https://x.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1937935738408161304
Boyish persian pit
  06/27/25
1️⃣8️⃣0️⃣
swashbuckling principal's office
  06/28/25
Let him discuss the law
floppy outnumbered heaven
  06/27/25
(JACKSON, J.)
Boyish persian pit
  06/27/25
...
contagious transparent school
  06/27/25
...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/27/25
...
Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe
  06/27/25
...
beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter
  06/27/25
...
histrionic unhinged jap
  06/27/25
...
Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested
  06/27/25
...
brilliant crackhouse
  06/27/25
...
Twisted temple
  06/27/25
...
Ultramarine adventurous personal credit line coldplay fan
  06/28/25
going to cite this thread every time a deranged lib asks me ...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
not a lawyer. how will this work in practice when shitlib ha...
puce alpha candlestick maker
  06/27/25
judgment immediately stayed by appellate court and then swif...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
LOL
silver sanctuary
  06/27/25
...
heady roommate
  06/27/25
...
Fishy mother
  06/27/25
The injunction applies only to the plaintiff. If the govern...
soul-stirring clown
  06/27/25
Lib lawyers masturbating furiously
Fragrant buff rigpig
  06/27/25
It won't, because they'll file it as a class action and reli...
silver sanctuary
  06/27/25
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/universal-injunctions-...
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
if filing as a putative class action is a bulletproof "...
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
Class actions aren't bulletproof.
elite crawly address
  06/27/25
Jackson's dissent will be the basis for a new country that w...
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/27/25
if you will
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
have you read about how the Israeli SCOTUS works? they de fa...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
Didn't Bibi change this? Can't they amend it?
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/27/25
https://www.npr.org/2024/01/01/1222400537/israel-supreme-cou...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
you should visit Canada, you'd like it there
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/27/25
What's Canada's SCOTUS like? I thought it would be like UK w...
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/27/25
nah it has bootstrapped itself into a gay race communism dic...
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/27/25
Wow just like in the Soviet Union. A body that's above the l...
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/27/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
Uh oh Trumpmos. It seems your grand plan to be cunts to brow...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
means deportations of these fraudulent "citizens" ...
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/27/25
"Brown" people is a really racist term you mentall...
smoky sex offender
  06/27/25
Trumpmos? https://bsky.app/profile/normeisen.bsky.social/...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
(literally links to Norm Eisen)
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
This is where you are now? Lol
violent stock car
  06/27/25
Look at the replies, libs are not human lmao
razzmatazz messiness orchestra pit
  06/29/25
https://x.com/KathleenBushJo2/status/1938628033490862292
Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap
  06/27/25
Jackson's clerks are reading the ACB take-down and are wonde...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
can someone explain - does she hire retarded clerks, or are ...
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/27/25
i assume she hired the best of the best. to what extent she ...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
i assume she hires AA morons with great paper resumes -- but...
Bespoke Iridescent Tanning Salon
  06/27/25
Stone, formerly an associate at Williams & Connolly, sai...
Boyish persian pit
  06/27/25
the clerks run the draft through chatgpt and ask it to "...
pearly awkward hominid
  06/27/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
on the contrary, it takes a very intelligent person to creat...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
It doesn't matter. She is writing for case books for future ...
slate point ratface
  06/28/25
Plaintiff has already re-filed as a class action asking judg...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
Wachtell lawyer says new nationwide injunction in a matter o...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
will the courts apply a super loose version of commonality?
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
no one cares about lawyers or any of their gay bullshit.
smoky sex offender
  06/27/25
I'm trying to understand how this would work. Is he suggest...
beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter
  06/27/25
i think they will now re-tool the complaint to be a class ac...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
Barrett’s opinion leaves open the possibility of bring...
Racy mischievous death wish hospital
  06/27/25
One weird trick
irradiated idiotic weed whacker
  06/27/25
cr
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
Anyone who talks about certifying a class like it’s no...
translucent national
  06/28/25
At the TRO stage you wouldn’t have to have it certifie...
Racy mischievous death wish hospital
  06/28/25
obtaining a classwide TRO on behalf of a non-certified class...
slate point ratface
  06/28/25
wouldn't the class action be part of the "likely to suc...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/28/25
Yes, i think it would go to the merits in the analysis. I th...
Racy mischievous death wish hospital
  06/28/25
...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/28/25
Ty
beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter
  06/28/25
i wonder kentanji considers for even a moment that her two l...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
that thing when even Sotomayor thinks, "jfc that is so ...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
black women operate at levels of strident PROUDNESS that i d...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
...
silver sanctuary
  06/28/25
She's becoming a star on the left. The View will read from h...
Vigorous carnelian dog poop stead
  06/27/25
it just confirms that they're all racist. everything critica...
pearly awkward hominid
  06/27/25
It’s a policy puff piece. Not really a suitable legal ...
Racy mischievous death wish hospital
  06/27/25
i think the majority opinion that has the force of law serve...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
...
Misanthropic Chapel
  06/27/25
Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are . . . ...
Fishy mother
  06/27/25
she's turning the Court into an episode of The View
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/27/25
Very underrated part this
Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life
  06/28/25
legal schoalar says that Kagan's position on nationwide inju...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/27/25
evolving standards of injunctive decency
slate point ratface
  06/27/25
contemporary community standards of derangement within the l...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/27/25
Penumbral emanations of judicial authority.
silver sanctuary
  06/28/25
i heard this mentioned yesterday. it must have come up in or...
trip pink ticket booth reading party
  06/28/25
Does that guy’s dick even work? Didn’t he kill o...
Black curious university factory reset button
  06/27/25
you didn't see the weird naked tape? he was a passenger i...
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/27/25
Naked tape was just chill fratty straight AF bros horsing ar...
Appetizing shitlib
  06/27/25
Jackson: “the Judiciary—the one institution that...
Cerebral hyperventilating feces
  06/28/25
holy fuck at this sentence female law students will lap i...
slate point ratface
  06/28/25
I take her to mean that the legislature and the executive ar...
Chocolate Cuckoldry
  06/28/25
it’s so 180 that the Court killed “resistance 2....
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/28/25
It’s funny seeing mainstream people casually tweeting ...
onyx pontificating party of the first part
  06/28/25
you know Alito & Thomas saw this thread on "last 24...
slate point ratface
  06/28/25
...
Unholy cobalt locale
  06/28/25
...
Yellow Razzle Gaping Friendly Grandma
  06/28/25
...
razzle-dazzle turdskin pervert
  06/28/25
...
purple sexy place of business queen of the night
  06/28/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/28/25
...
Fishy mother
  06/28/25
...
wonderful goyim
  06/28/25
...
diverse mustard theatre
  06/28/25
It’s second most active for the month
diverse mustard theatre
  06/28/25
...
Twisted temple
  06/29/25
...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/29/25
...
Unholy cobalt locale
  06/28/25
The Yann Perrod av cracks me up
razzle-dazzle turdskin pervert
  06/28/25
...
Crystalline Preventive Strike
  06/29/25
...
Rose Exciting Spot
  06/29/25
great thread
Azure flatulent area marketing idea
  06/28/25
...
costumed site
  06/28/25
...
glittery box office incel
  06/28/25
how does she go to work after this?
pearly awkward hominid
  06/28/25
probably late in the day. in a pink and white escalade with ...
Bull Headed Sandwich
  06/28/25
WE HOLDIN COURT!!
pearly awkward hominid
  06/28/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/28/25
...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/29/25
...
Twisted temple
  06/29/25
Stephen Miller explains the importance of this decision htt...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/28/25
Can any civ pro mastermen opine on why it's not going to be ...
Chocolate Cuckoldry
  06/28/25
A district court judge that wants to do that can definitely ...
Cerebral hyperventilating feces
  06/29/25
...
Twisted temple
  06/29/25
...
titillating slimy telephone parlor
  06/29/25
...
Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life
  06/29/25
...
Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness
  06/29/25
cr. i think Alito stressed that Rule 23 is a tough standard...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/29/25
ACB's muse on this issue, a prof at Notre Dame Law, offers t...
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/29/25
...
Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life
  06/29/25
"We live in a time of great pressure on our constitutio...
trip pink ticket booth reading party
  06/29/25
all true. libs always projecting.
mind-boggling deer antler
  06/29/25
...
Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe
  06/30/25
Trumpmos MAF https://x.com/marcofoster_/status/1943320539...
Black curious university factory reset button
  07/10/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:06 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053454)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:09 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

any lawyers awake

6-3 scotus says fed dist ct enjoining executive orders on nationwide basis exceeds judicial power

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053461)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:09 AM
Author: Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested

holy shit 180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053467)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:10 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

wowza

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053473)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:52 AM
Author: bistre yarmulke hell



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053622)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:15 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

Nationwide injunctions still exist for states, though. Looks like they will be the plaintiffs in challenges to presidents, going forward.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053488)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:22 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

you talking abt discussion at end of B2 (p17-19)?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053515)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:26 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

The complete-relief inquiry is more complicated for the

state respondents, because the relevant injunction does not

purport to directly benefit nonparties. Instead, the District Court for the District of Massachusetts decided that a uni versal injunction was necessary to provide the States them selves with complete relief. See 766 F. Supp. 3d, at 288.14

The States maintain that the District Court made the right

call. See Opposition to Application in No. 24A886 (New Jer-

sey), at 31–39.

As the States see it, their harms—financial injuries and

the administrative burdens flowing from citizen-dependent

benefits programs—cannot be remedied without a blanket

ban on the enforcement of the Executive Order. See, e.g.,

id., at 9–11. Children often move across state lines or are

born outside their parents’ State of residence. Id., at 31, 35.

Given the cross-border flow, the States say, a “patchwork

injunction” would prove unworkable, because it would re-

quire them to track and verify the immigration status of the

parents of every child, along with the birth State of every

child for whom they provide certain federally funded bene-

fits. Ibid.

The Government—unsurprisingly—sees matters differ-

ently. It retorts that even if the injunction is designed to

benefit only the States, it is “more burdensome than neces-

sary to redress” their asserted harms. Califano, 442 U. S.,

at 702. After all, to say that a court can award complete

relief is not to say that it should do so. Complete relief is

not a guarantee—it is the maximum a court can provide.

And in equity, “the broader and deeper the remedy the

plaintiff wants, the stronger the plaintiff ’s story needs to

be.” S. Bray & P. Miller, Getting into Equity, 97 Notre

Dame L. Rev. 1763, 1797 (2022). In short, “[t]he essence of

equity jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to

do equity and to mould each decree to the necessities of the

particular case.” Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U. S. 321, 329 19Cite as: 606 U. S. ____ (2025)

Opinion of the Court

(1944).

Leaning on these principles, the Government contends

that narrower relief is appropriate. For instance, the Dis-

trict Court could forbid the Government to apply the Exec-

utive Order within the respondent States, including to chil-

dren born elsewhere but living in those States. Application

in No. 24A884, at 23. Or, the Government says, the District

Court could direct the Government to “treat covered chil-

dren as eligible for purposes of federally funded welfare

benefits.” Ibid. It asks us to stay the injunction insofar as

it sweeps too broadly.

We decline to take up these arguments in the first in-

stance. The lower courts should determine whether a nar-

rower injunction is appropriate; we therefore leave it to

them to consider these and any related arguments.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053534)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:24 PM
Author: multi-colored affirmative action



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054213)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:16 AM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

You left out a critical part tho

“The court has made it clear that it is not deciding whether the executive order is constitutional and instructed the district courts to "move expeditiously to ensure that, with respect to each plaintiff, the injunctions comport with this rule and otherwise comply with principles of equity."

https://x.com/scotusblog/status/1938600052621971665?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053492)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:18 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

thanks for the twitter link!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053497)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwcXmQjVi3U&t=185s

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053503)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:21 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

i expected a video of a guy opening a twitter link about a blog about a scotus opinion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053511)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:24 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

https://x.com/andrewmgrossman/status/1938602878223937688

So two big end-arounds to the ruling- getting states to file them and filing class actions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053526)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:18 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

Not sure if that will lead to a flood of litigation or curtail it. Only so many plaintiffs can afford to file a federal lawsuit, and biglaw firms are afraid to touch this stuff now that Trump is retaliating against them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053498)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:51 AM
Author: Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053617)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:25 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

amazing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053883)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:09 AM
Author: maroon stimulating international law enforcement agency

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053465)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:24 AM
Author: Talented Bronze Stag Film Travel Guidebook

ketanji patted on the head:

We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053523)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:26 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

holy shit SHOT ACROSS THE BOW at Dworkin’s Law’s Empire

does HLA HART get cited here?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053533)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 7:51 AM
Author: peach piazza ladyboy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055744)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:29 AM
Author: Bespoke Iridescent Tanning Salon

rofl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053543)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:01 AM
Author: ocher crusty haunted graveyard athletic conference



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053658)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:48 PM
Author: elite crawly address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055073)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:35 AM
Author: Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested

the whole section on the jackson dissent is brutal

The principal dissent focuses on conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789 and our cases on equity.

JUSTICE JACKSON, however, chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly,

to any doctrine whatsoever. Waving away attention to the

limits on judicial power as a “mind-numbingly technical

query,” post, at 3 (dissenting opinion), she offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush. In her telling, the fundamental role of courts is to “order everyone (including the

Executive) to follow the law—full stop.” Post, at 2; see also

post, at 10 (“[T]he function of the courts—both in theory and

in practice—necessarily includes announcing what the law

requires in . . . suits for the benefit of all who are protected

by the Constitution, not merely doling out relief to injured

private parties”); see also post, at 11, n. 3, 15. And, she

warns, if courts lack the power to “require the Executive to

adhere to law universally,” post, at 15, courts will leave a

“gash in the basic tenets of our founding charter that could

turn out to be a mortal wound,” post, at 12.

Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficult to

pin down. She might be arguing that universal injunctions

are appropriate—even required—whenever the defendant

is part of the Executive Branch. See, e.g., post, at 3, 10–12,

16–18. If so, her position goes far beyond the mainstream

defense of universal injunctions. See, e.g., Frost, 93

N. Y. U. L. Rev., at 1069 (“Nationwide injunctions come

with significant costs and should never be the default remedy in cases challenging federal executive action”). As best

we can tell, though, her argument is more extreme still, because its logic does not depend on the entry of a universal

injunction: JUSTICE JACKSON appears to believe that the

reasoning behind any court order demands “universal adherence,” at least where the Executive is concerned. Post,

at 2 (dissenting opinion). In her law-declaring vision of the

judicial function, a district court’s opinion is not just persuasive, but has the legal force of a judgment. But see Haaland v. Brackeen, 599 U. S. 255, 294 (2023) (“It is a federal

court’s judgment, not its opinion, that remedies an injury”).

Once a single district court deems executive conduct unlawful, it has stated what the law requires. And the Executive

must conform to that view, ceasing its enforcement of thelaw against anyone, anywhere.17

We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which

is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent,

not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this:

JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.

No one disputes that the Executive has a duty to follow

the law. But the Judiciary does not have unbridled authority to enforce this obligation—in fact, sometimes the law

prohibits the Judiciary from doing so. See, e.g., Marbury v.

Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803) (concluding that James Madison had violated the law but holding that the Court lacked

jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus ordering him to

follow it). But see post, at 15 (JACKSON, J., dissenting) (“If

courts do not have the authority to require the Executive to

adhere to law universally, . . . compliance with law sometimes becomes a matter of Executive prerogative”). Observing the limits on judicial authority—including, as relevant

here, the boundaries of the Judiciary Act of 1789—is required by a judge’s oath to follow the law.

JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring “legalese,” post, at

3, she seeks to answer “a far more basic question of enormous practical significance: May a federal court in the United States of America order the Executive to follow the

law?” Ibid. In other words, it is unecessary to consider

whether Congress has constrained the Judiciary; what matters is how the Judiciary may constrain the Executive.

JUSTICE JACKSON would do well to heed her own admonition: “[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by

law.” Ibid. That goes for judges too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053565)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:39 AM
Author: Fragrant buff rigpig

Ahahahah take that nigger!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053574)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:39 AM
Author: contagious transparent school

gash in the basic tenets of our founding charter that could turn out to be a mortal wound

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053575)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:42 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053584)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:48 AM
Author: contagious transparent school

The penumbral gash! The scholarly aperture! The juristic penetralium!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053608)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:51 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053619)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:53 AM
Author: slate point ratface



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053630)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:33 AM
Author: aromatic kink-friendly gas station



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053745)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:57 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053982)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:05 PM
Author: painfully honest foreskin business firm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054006)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:24 PM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054634)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 5:38 PM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054788)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:00 PM
Author: obsidian cruise ship



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055308)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 12:33 AM
Author: fear-inspiring electric furnace skinny woman



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055531)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:46 AM
Author: slate point ratface

o the soaring metaphor!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053599)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:51 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053620)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:33 AM
Author: aromatic kink-friendly gas station



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053744)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:41 AM
Author: contagious transparent school



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053771)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:53 PM
Author: Glassy Plaza French Chef



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054537)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:19 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

i do agree with her that we should eliminate all the gashes from the government

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053703)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:44 PM
Author: Twisted temple

She’s not wrong that gash may be what brings down the Republic

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059110)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:40 AM
Author: brilliant crackhouse

WOW

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053578)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:51 AM
Author: Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe

l m a o

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053621)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:03 AM
Author: ocher crusty haunted graveyard athletic conference



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053664)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:55 AM
Author: Comical flushed organic girlfriend

Lol didn’t some poaster say they made Barrett cry by saying all law is just made up bs. Really see that energy here, there are doctrines dammit!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053633)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:55 AM
Author: brilliant crackhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053635)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:59 AM
Author: ivory striped hyena pisswyrm

Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficult to pin down. Lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053648)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:06 PM
Author: painfully honest foreskin business firm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054007)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:57 PM
Author: Big zombie-like karate abode



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055088)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 8:00 PM
Author: elite crawly address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055098)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:18 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

lol that marbury cite must be the closest the majority has come to straight up calling a dissenting justice retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053701)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:36 AM
Author: Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053757)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:40 AM
Author: Fishy mother



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053768)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:45 AM
Author: Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested

calls her lazy too:

JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring “legalese,”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053779)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:46 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

Rhetoric aside, JUSTICE JACKSON’s position is difficult to pin down

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXtJUOlZAmU

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053783)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:09 PM
Author: Vigorous carnelian dog poop stead

Close enough to shave

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053835)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:14 PM
Author: slate point ratface

come on, you can't expect her to know every obscure 19th century case in the books

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053860)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:58 PM
Author: histrionic unhinged jap

cr dat old skool she new skool

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054704)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 8:02 AM
Author: ebony background story



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055759)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 9:44 PM
Author: narrow-minded juggernaut toaster



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055286)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: violent stock car



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053894)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053908)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:06 PM
Author: painfully honest foreskin business firm



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054008)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:12 PM
Author: brilliant crackhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054033)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:16 PM
Author: diverse mustard theatre



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054045)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054051)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:27 AM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055980)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:33 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

my God that woman might have a family

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053906)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: Boyish persian pit

nigger fatigue

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054183)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:46 PM
Author: excitant trust fund

Is this the biggest smackdown on a fellow scotus justice ever?

Observing the limits on judicial authority—including, as relevant

here, the boundaries of the Judiciary Act of 1789—is required by a judge’s oath to follow the law.

JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring “legalese,” post, at

3, she seeks to answer “a far more basic question of enormous practical significance: May a federal court in the United States of America order the Executive to follow the

law?” Ibid. In other words, it is unecessary to consider

whether Congress has constrained the Judiciary; what matters is how the Judiciary may constrain the Executive.

JUSTICE JACKSON would do well to heed her own admonition: “[E]veryone, from the President on down, is bound by

law.” Ibid. That goes for judges too.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054286)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:31 PM
Author: Crystalline Preventive Strike

Yes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055027)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:55 PM
Author: brilliant crackhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055496)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:40 PM
Author: beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter

How is any of this real

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054484)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 12:28 PM
Author: trip pink ticket booth reading party

it's not like any of this was 'gotcha' material. she could have supplemented, amended, changed, etc her dissent to address the criticisms

she must be so arrogant

made me think of her clerks. about her first four

The hires include Claire Madill, who has been working in Florida as a public defender, a role Jackson once served in, and who co-founded Law Clerks for Workplace Accountability, a group of current and former law clerks that argued for the judiciary to make changes to prevent workplace misconduct.

In an email, the University of Michigan Law School graduate said she was "incredibly honored and privileged to have been given this opportunity."

Two other hires clerked for Jackson previously: Kerrel Murray, in district court, and Natalie Salmanowitz, in the D.C. Circuit.

Murray is a Stanford Law School graduate and an associate professor at Columbia Law School who writes on constitutional law, election law and race and the law. Salmanowitz, a Harvard Law School graduate, is a law clerk at Hogan Lovells.

Jackson also is hiring Michael Qian, a Stanford law graduate and associate at Morrison & Foerster who earlier clerked for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died in 2020.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056169)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:59 PM
Author: elite crawly address

GAPED

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055095)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 9:30 AM
Author: galvanic misunderstood doctorate center

lol nigger

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057713)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:57 AM
Author: Fishy mother

ouch

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053643)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:33 AM
Author: brilliant crackhouse

wait a second, is this what it looks like, actually a huge blow to nationwide injunctions??

Held: Universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that

Congress has given to federal courts. The Court grants the Govern-

ment’s applications for a partial stay of the injunctions entered below,

but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary

to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue. Pp. 4–

26.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053550)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:33 AM
Author: brilliant crackhouse

The issuance of a universal in-

junction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet

Congress has granted federal courts no such power.

(These are from the syllabus)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053556)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:36 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053569)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:34 AM
Author: brilliant crackhouse

Wow it looks like it:

Such injunctions are sometimes called “nationwide injunctions,” re-

flecting their use by a single district court to bar the enforcement of a

law anywhere in the Nation. But the term “universal” better captures

how these injunctions work.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053564)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:33 AM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Can’t wait to see how Newsom uses this in 2029

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053552)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:40 AM
Author: Fragrant buff rigpig

Can he put it in his ass?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053576)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:47 AM
Author: slate point ratface

Supreme Court holds 8-1 that he cannot (Roberts, CJ, dissenting)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053603)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:56 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053638)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe

roberts’ dissent contains but two lines, efficient and ominous:

“they have made their decision; now let them enforce it. molon lube”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053651)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: slate point ratface



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053654)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:02 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053659)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:07 PM
Author: Twisted temple



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053832)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:49 PM
Author: smoky sex offender

you mean the guy who set half of Los Angeles on fire a few months ago? he isn't winning shit you retarded jewish pedophile. stop having the shittiest takes on literally every topic.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054682)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:45 AM
Author: slate point ratface

Hawaii judge hastily crawling "except for in Loving County, Texas" at bottom of every injunction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053595)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:51 AM
Author: charismatic people who are hurt resort

district courts will just ignore this, hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053616)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:53 AM
Author: Fragrant buff rigpig

And Trump will just ignore them, hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053631)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:57 AM
Author: charismatic people who are hurt resort

no he won't, hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053642)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 10:58 AM
Author: Fragrant buff rigpig

You’re a jew with small wrists, hth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053645)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:03 AM
Author: charismatic people who are hurt resort

wrong again, kikeboi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053666)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 8:04 PM
Author: elite crawly address



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055106)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

Remember after SCOTUS got rid of Chevron deference in their Loper Bright decision last year? Everyone predicted it would change everything, but it has had no noticeable impact that I can see.

I expect plaintiffs will just use the twin loopholes of class actions and having states file these actions and things will continue pretty much as before.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053656)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:03 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night

classic loophole of incorporating as a united state just before filing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053668)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: slate point ratface



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053685)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:12 AM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053689)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:17 AM
Author: Twisted temple

Tp

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053698)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:18 AM
Author: Fishy mother



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053702)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:32 AM
Author: Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053743)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:39 AM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053764)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:02 PM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053815)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: violent stock car



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053896)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053912)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:15 PM
Author: Boyish persian pit

pierce that veil

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054192)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:45 PM
Author: Twisted temple

*puts state inside an LLC*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059113)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:10 PM
Author: beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054592)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:02 AM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

jfc the way Barrett treats Jackson -- "no one can understand what Jackson was trying to say."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053662)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:03 AM
Author: brilliant crackhouse

Don't know if I've seen a scathing takedown like this outside of scalia.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053665)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:22 AM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053710)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: soul-stirring clown

Does this mean executive orders and federal regulations are no longer subject to judicial review, as a practical matter?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053684)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:11 AM
Author: charismatic people who are hurt resort

are you retarded?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053686)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:13 AM
Author: soul-stirring clown

No. Just want to understand the case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053691)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:49 PM
Author: Boyish persian pit

https://x.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1937935738408161304

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054684)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:20 AM
Author: swashbuckling principal's office

1️⃣8️⃣0️⃣

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055853)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:19 AM
Author: floppy outnumbered heaven

Let him discuss the law

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053704)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:17 PM
Author: Boyish persian pit

(JACKSON, J.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054193)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:56 PM
Author: contagious transparent school



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054548)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:40 PM
Author: slate point ratface



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054670)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:41 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054671)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:49 PM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054683)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:49 PM
Author: Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054685)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:54 PM
Author: beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054693)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 5:01 PM
Author: histrionic unhinged jap



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054710)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 8:46 PM
Author: Hairraiser Turquoise Boltzmann Idea He Suggested



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055198)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 8:49 PM
Author: brilliant crackhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055200)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 9:29 PM
Author: Twisted temple



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055250)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:12 AM
Author: Ultramarine adventurous personal credit line coldplay fan



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055950)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:20 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

going to cite this thread every time a deranged lib asks me if i regret voting for trump yet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053707)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:20 AM
Author: puce alpha candlestick maker

not a lawyer. how will this work in practice when shitlib hawaii judge files injunction anyways.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053708)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:22 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

judgment immediately stayed by appellate court and then swiftly overruled.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053711)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:40 AM
Author: silver sanctuary

LOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053767)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:41 AM
Author: heady roommate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053772)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:40 AM
Author: Fishy mother



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053770)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:29 AM
Author: soul-stirring clown

The injunction applies only to the plaintiff. If the government implements an unlawful policy, every affected person has to file their own lawsuit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053739)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:49 AM
Author: Fragrant buff rigpig

Lib lawyers masturbating furiously

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053793)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:40 AM
Author: silver sanctuary

It won't, because they'll file it as a class action and relief will be granted to the putative class.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053769)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:42 AM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/universal-injunctions-are-dead-or-are-they/

And this doesn't even mention the state-filing route. The APA loophole mentioned is yet another one.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053774)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:49 AM
Author: slate point ratface

if filing as a putative class action is a bulletproof "one weird trick" why haven't they been doing this all along?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053791)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 8:35 PM
Author: elite crawly address

Class actions aren't bulletproof.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055174)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:48 AM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker

Jackson's dissent will be the basis for a new country that will emerge later this century. A country ruled by a committee of shitlibs that can overrule the executive and legislative branches. A sort of Supreme Soviet if you will.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053789)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:35 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

if you will

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053915)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:06 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

have you read about how the Israeli SCOTUS works? they de facto choose their own successors and it's been captured by the Israeli version of shitlibs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054011)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:51 PM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker

Didn't Bibi change this? Can't they amend it?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054125)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:52 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

https://www.npr.org/2024/01/01/1222400537/israel-supreme-court-ruling-judiciary-changes

last i heard, the court rejected the key changes Bibi was pushing through. they can still strike down any law if they think it's not reasonable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054314)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:12 PM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich

you should visit Canada, you'd like it there



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054394)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:37 PM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker

What's Canada's SCOTUS like? I thought it would be like UK with parliamentary superiority to overrule the other branches

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054468)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:45 PM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich

nah it has bootstrapped itself into a gay race communism dictatorship.

act as a crazy policy making body, pointing to everything from international law to ancient indian traditions to feelings as authority.

people get angsty, government considers appointing justices who aren't complete crackpots. supreme court decrees their appointment illegal.

amend the legislation - supreme court deems the supreme court act, a regular statute passed by parliament, to now be a defacto constitutional document and beyond parliament's authority to amend.

etc.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055061)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:57 PM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker

Wow just like in the Soviet Union. A body that's above the law. They've got everything but a General Secretary. Ty peeface for this scholarship. Makes you worry if something like that could ever happen here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055087)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:31 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055458)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:49 AM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Uh oh Trumpmos. It seems your grand plan to be cunts to brown people is still in jeopardy

https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1938625432779378958?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053792)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:40 PM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich

means deportations of these fraudulent "citizens" needs to start this morning



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053928)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:53 PM
Author: smoky sex offender

"Brown" people is a really racist term you mentally retarded jewish pedo racist piece of shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054692)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:56 AM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Trumpmos?

https://bsky.app/profile/normeisen.bsky.social/post/3lslx5n2hwc25

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053803)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:35 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

(literally links to Norm Eisen)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053917)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:22 PM
Author: violent stock car

This is where you are now? Lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054061)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 9:27 AM
Author: razzmatazz messiness orchestra pit

Look at the replies, libs are not human lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057706)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:11 PM
Author: Beta step-uncle's house mad-dog skullcap

https://x.com/KathleenBushJo2/status/1938628033490862292

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053844)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:38 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

Jackson's clerks are reading the ACB take-down and are wondering "wtf kind of dissent did we just publish?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053925)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:42 PM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich

can someone explain - does she hire retarded clerks, or are these people simply bringing her drafts and she replies "no, not stupid enough" until they bend to her will?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053934)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:04 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

i assume she hired the best of the best. to what extent she directs them i have no idea.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054004)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:36 PM
Author: Bespoke Iridescent Tanning Salon

i assume she hires AA morons with great paper resumes -- but every accomplishment they have is AA. got into a top UG due to AA, got into HLS due to AA and an inflated gpa in white men suck studies, got onto HLR due to AA, got good recs from profs who are AA idiots themselves, etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054100)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 2:21 PM
Author: Boyish persian pit

Stone, formerly an associate at Williams & Connolly, said he is “incredibly excited” about clerking for Justice Jackson and credited numerous Law School faculty and staff members with guiding him through the clerkship process.

“It’s definitely a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity and to say that I feel blessed would be an understatement,” he said. “I am fortunate to have a very strong community of mentors and supporters.”

https://magazine.law.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/11/Clerks-2024-980x652.jpg

https://law.duke.edu/news/donovan-stone-20-clerk-us-supreme-court-associate-justice-ketanji-brown-jackson

“I feel like the luckiest lawyer in the country, and this opportunity means so much to me,” said Janes, who graduated from UVA’s J.D.-M.A. Program in History. “I’m a public defender with a background in legal history, and I am excited to clerk for a justice who herself was a public defender, and who so intelligently and honestly employs history to reason through our nation’s most intractable legal issues.”

https://www.law.virginia.edu/sites/default/files/styles/open_graph_image/public/images/janes-3000.jpg?h=ba5e7803&itok=WIftiFax

While at Columbia Law, Landry received the John Ordronaux Prize, awarded for the highest academic average in his graduating class, and the Emil Schlesinger Labor Law Prize.

https://www.law.columbia.edu/news/archive/joseph-r-landry-16-awarded-supreme-court-clerkship

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054204)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:51 PM
Author: pearly awkward hominid

the clerks run the draft through chatgpt and ask it to "nigger it up a little bit"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054688)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:32 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055461)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 5:03 PM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

on the contrary, it takes a very intelligent person to create a cogent argument for something so wrong. it's really easy to get to the correct decision, it's far more difficult to engage in reasonable sounding sophistry to arrive at the wrong one.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054714)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 8:36 AM
Author: slate point ratface

It doesn't matter. She is writing for case books for future law students. It's written to appeal to 21 year olds.

She understands the case book editors will simply remove those parts of Barrett's opinion that make Jackson look bad

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055805)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:43 PM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Plaintiff has already re-filed as a class action asking judge for a nationwide TRO

https://x.com/kyledcheney/status/1938638913234460700?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053939)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 12:57 PM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Wachtell lawyer says new nationwide injunction in a matter of days

https://bsky.app/profile/gtconway.bsky.social/post/3lsm4bdlnby2t

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49053983)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:08 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

will the courts apply a super loose version of commonality?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054017)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:11 PM
Author: smoky sex offender

no one cares about lawyers or any of their gay bullshit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054025)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:15 PM
Author: beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter

I'm trying to understand how this would work. Is he suggesting that the lower courts basically ignore the SCOTUS? If so, wouldn't that just practically mean that these injunctions go into effect and get struck down a few days later?

I don't deal with nationwide federal injunctions doing car accidents and divorces.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054603)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

i think they will now re-tool the complaint to be a class action in which this new case doesn't apply?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054643)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:35 PM
Author: Racy mischievous death wish hospital

Barrett’s opinion leaves open the possibility of bringing your action as a putative class action and arguing for the nationwide injunction because your class has members everywhere.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054662)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:37 PM
Author: irradiated idiotic weed whacker

One weird trick

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054666)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:50 PM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055075)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:58 AM
Author: translucent national

Anyone who talks about certifying a class like it’s not a significant additional hurdle to these cases is outed as a non-litigator. And get ready for SCOTUS to double double hard on Walmart v Dukes if district judges try to run amok.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056128)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 12:45 PM
Author: Racy mischievous death wish hospital

At the TRO stage you wouldn’t have to have it certified yet. But yes this is a significant procedural hurdle. The basis for the majority’s opinion (it’s reading of the judiciary act) is completely disingenuous.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056203)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:08 PM
Author: slate point ratface

obtaining a classwide TRO on behalf of a non-certified class? cite for that?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056271)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:09 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

wouldn't the class action be part of the "likely to succeed" analysis?

if so, Hawaiian judges could do real damage to plaintiff-side class action work. the judges would invite COA slapdowns and maybe even a SCOTUS slapdown.

if i were a class action guy i would not want to see Norm Eisen amend 20-30 cases to make them class actions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056274)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:54 PM
Author: Racy mischievous death wish hospital

Yes, i think it would go to the merits in the analysis. I think for something like this EO (birthright citizenship) district judges won’t be afraid to issue the TRO on the putative class. But yeah this is a serious procedural hurdle.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056333)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:07 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056267)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 4:13 PM
Author: beady-eyed chestnut patrolman faggot firefighter

Ty

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056549)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:24 PM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

i wonder kentanji considers for even a moment that her two liberal colleagues not signing on to her dissent means it's retarded. or that the majority taking aim at it so harshly means it's retarded.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054065)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:26 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

that thing when even Sotomayor thinks, "jfc that is so stupid i cannot join it."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054067)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:40 PM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

black women operate at levels of strident PROUDNESS that i don't think any other race can even conceptualize.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054107)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:49 AM
Author: silver sanctuary



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055571)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:52 PM
Author: Vigorous carnelian dog poop stead

She's becoming a star on the left. The View will read from her dissent and blubber all over it. She's getting exactly what she wants.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054126)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:53 PM
Author: pearly awkward hominid

it just confirms that they're all racist. everything critical of a black person is racist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054691)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 5:28 PM
Author: Racy mischievous death wish hospital

It’s a policy puff piece. Not really a suitable legal opinion. But it’s a fair warning. If cons on the court go down this road (I’m sure there are more procedural roadblocks they can throw on getting universal TRO’s) we’ll become susceptible to egregiously illegal rapid fire exec orders.

The Sotomayor dissent discussing the authority under the judiciary act to issue nationwide or universal injunctions was the better opinion. The concept of equitable remedies has always been extremely flexible and individuals challenging particular federal taxes could obtain universal injunctions even when not suing on behalf of others in the 18-19th centuries. The cons are really really reaching when they argue for their narrow definition of “courts of equity”. There’s never been a geographical bar or some requirement that the potential beneficiaries of the injunction be parties to the case. Nationwide injunctions weren’t much of a thing because federal law practically nonexistent in people’s lives.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054760)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 6:54 PM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

i think the majority opinion that has the force of law serves as a more effective warning to the district courts to stop hawaii judging than a dissent no liberal colleagues would endorse that trump should chill with the EOs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054954)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:37 PM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055042)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 1:45 PM
Author: Misanthropic Chapel



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054116)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:29 PM
Author: Fishy mother

Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are . . . (wait for it) . . . the district courts. See ante, at 1 (admonishing district courts for daring to “asser[t] the power” to order the Executive to follow the law universally).

Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are . . . (wait for it) . . . the district courts. See ante, at 1 (admonishing district courts for daring to “asser[t] the power” to order the Executive to follow the law universally).

Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are . . . (wait for it) . . . the district courts. See ante, at 1 (admonishing district courts for daring to “asser[t] the power” to order the Executive to follow the law universally).

Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are . . . (wait for it) . . . the district courts. See ante, at 1 (admonishing district courts for daring to “asser[t] the power” to order the Executive to follow the law universally).

Instead, to the majority, the power-hungry actors are . . . (wait for it) . . . the district courts. See ante, at 1 (admonishing district courts for daring to “asser[t] the power” to order the Executive to follow the law universally).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054442)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:34 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

she's turning the Court into an episode of The View

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055462)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 7:49 AM
Author: Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life

Very underrated part this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055736)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 3:48 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

legal schoalar says that Kagan's position on nationwide injunctions "just can't be right."

https://x.com/CawthornforNC/status/1938611433043800096

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054513)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 4:43 PM
Author: slate point ratface

evolving standards of injunctive decency

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054673)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 6:47 PM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor

contemporary community standards of derangement within the liberal judiciary

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49054944)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:47 AM
Author: silver sanctuary

Penumbral emanations of judicial authority.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055570)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 12:31 PM
Author: trip pink ticket booth reading party

i heard this mentioned yesterday. it must have come up in oral arguments (?) and she tried to distinguish this case from that case

hearing that small clip, good luck. anyone know if she actually had a point in distinguishing that from the decision?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056176)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 7:51 PM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Does that guy’s dick even work? Didn’t he kill one of his friends in a car wreck?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055078)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 8:05 PM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich

you didn't see the weird naked tape?

he was a passenger in the car.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055110)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 27th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: Appetizing shitlib

Naked tape was just chill fratty straight AF bros horsing around

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055465)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 4:27 AM
Author: Cerebral hyperventilating feces

Jackson: “the Judiciary—the one institution that is solely responsible for ensuring our Republic endures” …

What the hell is she talking about



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055631)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 8:35 AM
Author: slate point ratface

holy fuck at this sentence

female law students will lap it up ofc and that's ultimately her audience hete

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055802)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 8:37 PM
Author: Chocolate Cuckoldry

I take her to mean that the legislature and the executive are political branches, the members of which are concerned with getting reelected, while A III judges don't have that concern, so they can focus on their "sole[] responsibil[ity]" of supporting and defending and interpreting the constitution.

Or maybe, relatedly, the judiciary can focus on what is constitutional and not what is politically popular.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056986)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 4:51 AM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

it’s so 180 that the Court killed “resistance 2.0”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055642)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:46 AM
Author: onyx pontificating party of the first part

It’s funny seeing mainstream people casually tweeting AutoAdmit threads

https://x.com/jlippincott_/status/1938671725824135436

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055904)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:49 AM
Author: slate point ratface

you know Alito & Thomas saw this thread on "last 24 hours" and are just howling in laughter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055908)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:49 AM
Author: Unholy cobalt locale



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055910)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:50 AM
Author: Yellow Razzle Gaping Friendly Grandma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055913)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:54 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle turdskin pervert



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055918)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:13 AM
Author: purple sexy place of business queen of the night



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055952)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:23 AM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056059)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 12:17 PM
Author: Fishy mother



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056160)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 5:01 PM
Author: wonderful goyim



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056620)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 5:05 PM
Author: diverse mustard theatre



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056627)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 5:05 PM
Author: diverse mustard theatre

It’s second most active for the month

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056628)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:08 AM
Author: Twisted temple



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057563)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 9:16 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057698)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:49 AM
Author: Unholy cobalt locale



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055909)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:54 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle turdskin pervert

The Yann Perrod av cracks me up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055917)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 1:35 PM
Author: Crystalline Preventive Strike



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49058243)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:55 PM
Author: Rose Exciting Spot



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059138)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:50 AM
Author: Azure flatulent area marketing idea

great thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055911)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 9:55 AM
Author: costumed site



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055919)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:01 AM
Author: glittery box office incel



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055929)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:15 AM
Author: pearly awkward hominid

how does she go to work after this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055954)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:31 AM
Author: Bull Headed Sandwich

probably late in the day. in a pink and white escalade with giant rotating chrome rims.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49055989)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 10:48 AM
Author: pearly awkward hominid

WE HOLDIN COURT!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056013)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 11:24 AM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056060)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 9:26 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057705)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:42 PM
Author: Twisted temple



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059102)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 1:54 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness

Stephen Miller explains the importance of this decision

https://x.com/TheStormRedux/status/1938745217764516116

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056332)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 28th, 2025 8:44 PM
Author: Chocolate Cuckoldry

Can any civ pro mastermen opine on why it's not going to be very, very easy for Hawaii Judge to certify a class of, e.g., "all undocumented migrants with a potential asylum claim," etc. rendering this ruling essentially meaningless? The fact that a nationwide injunction would be relevant in a given case suggests there is a class that is numerous and has some typicality connection.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49056990)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 4:25 AM
Author: Cerebral hyperventilating feces

A district court judge that wants to do that can definitely still do so. Just give provisional relief before the class is certified. But it’s going to be open to appeal and tough to withstand scrutiny on a class that broad. Basically just gives exec much more attack room on procedural grounds if district courts try that. Which is the whole point of this SCOTUS decision- nationwide injunctions are just back dooring rule 23 which is designed in some respects to put limits on the breadth of them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057528)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:08 AM
Author: Twisted temple



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057562)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 9:27 AM
Author: titillating slimy telephone parlor



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49057708)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 1:23 PM
Author: Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49058226)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 1:24 PM
Author: Ruddy doobsian den twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49058230)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

cr.

i think Alito stressed that Rule 23 is a tough standard, so the COAs may make the strategy not so easy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49058253)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:40 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

ACB's muse on this issue, a prof at Notre Dame Law, offers this NYT op-ed. libs are Yosemite Samming about it.

====

Opinion

Guest Essay

The Supreme Court Is Watching Out for the Courts, Not for Trump

June 28, 2025

By Samuel Bray

Mr. Bray is a law professor at the University of Notre Dame.

On Friday, the Supreme Court decided the birthright citizenship cases — except they aren’t really about birthright citizenship. In an executive order issued in January, President Trump wanted to redefine citizenship in the United States. The court’s decision in Trump v. CASA does not address that effort; it is rather about the scope of remedies given by the federal courts.

In the decision, a 6-3 majority of the court held that the federal courts have no authority to issue universal injunctions, which are court orders that control how the government acts toward everyone in the country, not just the parties in the case. The high court’s decision has the potential to reshape the relationship between the federal judiciary and the executive branch — and the court got it right.

In rejecting the practice of universal injunctions, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the proper role of the federal courts within our constitutional system.

What the justices got right was a shift in thinking about what Americans want our courts to do, and especially how they should operate in a democracy under pressure.

There has been a shift toward a new model of judicial interaction with the executive branch. This new model has been marked by broader remedies, faster timelines, fewer trials and less factual development — which is to say, less time devoted to discovery and oral argument in lower courts. It has also meant more extreme forum-shopping for favorable judges — when plaintiffs seek out a specific judge whom they wish to hear their case, presumably because of how they expect that judge to rule.

Removing universal injunctions does not change all of that — it is not like the last Jenga block that makes the tower fall. But the universal injunction has supported and intensified all those other developments. Removing it gives the courts a chance to reset, and to shift toward the more deliberative mode in which they do their best work.

Since 2015 and the meteoric rise of universal injunctions, Federal District Courts have stepped in to stop almost every major presidential initiative, from President Barack Obama’s DACA expansion (which has protected thousands of young immigrants from deportation) to President Trump’s travel ban, and from President Joe Biden’s student loan forgiveness to President Trump’s order purporting to revoke birthright citizenship.

In line with previous precedents, the court said that federal courts have the power to give traditional equitable remedies, which emphasize fairness and justice for the parties to the case and are based on the practice of the English Court of Chancery. The universal injunction’s relative novelty — it was invented in the 20th century, and took a star turn only in the 21st — means that it lies outside of the powers of the federal courts.

In a powerful and comprehensive opinion for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett showed how dissonant the universal injunction is with the traditional practice of the federal courts.

Even though the court was decisive in rejecting the universal injunction, it left open many other questions. These include when states and organizations can sue on behalf of other people, whether a federal statute called the Administrative Procedure Act allows federal courts to rule on regulations set by federal agencies for the country, and when courts should give broad injunctions to afford an individual or state plaintiff “complete relief.”

Another important question left open is how easy or hard it will be for people challenging executive orders to bring class actions, which allow an individual plaintiff to represent many other people in a case. Class actions also offer sweeping relief.

How the court decides these questions in the future will determine the decision’s practical effect.

What is not going to change because of this decision is birthright citizenship. The court stated that the executive order would not go into effect for 30 days, which gives plenty of time for the challengers to switch from universal injunctions to other avenues like class actions. I expect the courts to continue to reject in case after case the government’s arguments for the birthright citizenship order. The likely result is that President Trump’s unconstitutional executive order on birthright citizenship will never go into effect.

But something else is at stake — competing visions for the role of the courts in our constitutional system. One vision is to say that the job of every judge is to declare the law and make sure everyone, including the president, follows it all the time. There’s a lot to be said for following the law, and in our constitutional system, no one is above it.

Another vision is to say that the chief job of the courts is to decide cases. Resolving disputes is what gives the courts their legitimacy: It is the core of the judicial power given by the Constitution, and robust judicial power is tolerable in a democracy precisely because the judges stay in their lane. A judge’s job is not to say, “Someone is wrong on the internet” and then do something about it. Instead, her job is to decide the case before her fearlessly, according to the existing law, and to give the proper remedy to whichever party wins.

These two visions were on offer in the opinions in Trump v. CASA, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson offering the first vision in dissent, and Justice Barrett offering the second vision for the majority.

We live in a time of great pressure on our constitutional system, with a president who thinks he can make laws (he can’t), suspend laws (he can’t) and punish enemies without a trial (he can’t). It is precisely at this time that the first vision is most attractive — and the second vision is most essential.

The courts must defend constitutional rights and liberties. But they must defend them as courts defend them: deciding cases for the parties and giving remedies to the parties. That function is what gives courts their constitutional legitimacy in a democratic society.

It will mean that courts don’t have the power to remedy every wrong. And it will mean that a patchwork of rulings sometimes persists. But to remedy every wrong immediately and everywhere — outside of the case and the parties — is not what the courts are designed for.

In rejecting the concept of the universal injunction, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the proper role of the federal courts within our constitutional system. It is not naïve or undemocratic for the courts to lead by example in adhering to the rule of law.

Samuel Bray is a law professor at the University of Notre Dame.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059098)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 7:44 PM
Author: Twinkling Mediation Love Of Her Life



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059112)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 8:18 PM
Author: trip pink ticket booth reading party

"We live in a time of great pressure on our constitutional system, with a president who thinks he can make laws (he can’t), suspend laws (he can’t) and punish enemies without a trial (he can’t)."

make laws-forgive student loan debt

suspend laws-student loan debt, border enforcement

punish enemies without a trial-jan 6 commission, impeachment farces, fraud trial is only about damages

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059193)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 29th, 2025 8:19 PM
Author: mind-boggling deer antler

all true. libs always projecting.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49059200)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 30th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: Stirring underhanded dilemma sweet tailpipe



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49060557)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 10th, 2025 10:48 AM
Author: Black curious university factory reset button

Trumpmos MAF

https://x.com/marcofoster_/status/1943320539407204412?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5743734&forum_id=2#49089735)