John Locke made a good point about King David
| Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | frozen faggotry | 10/31/25 | | Walnut school cafeteria boistinker | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Green field | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 10/31/25 | | Green field | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | drunken locale main people | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Green field | 10/31/25 | | drunken locale main people | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 10/31/25 | | Green field | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 11/01/25 | | Chocolate Institution | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 10/31/25 | | Sickened big stag film son of senegal | 10/31/25 | | Spectacular site | 10/31/25 | | Sickened big stag film son of senegal | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig | 10/31/25 | | Idiotic bateful party of the first part | 10/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 31st, 2025 5:41 PM Author: Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig
Jews went for centuries without a king, then boom! God gave them a king. But the king still had to earn it.
Both the prolonged absences of a king and the fact that David had to earn his title are offered as evidence against the divine right of kings. Pretty powerful stuff.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5792139&forum_id=2#49391416) |
Date: October 31st, 2025 9:06 PM Author: Green field
God went on a giant rant in the bible about how they shouldn't appoint a king, it was a terrible idea, and they were fools to consider it.
as usual, the heebs ignored Him.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5792139&forum_id=2#49391768)
|
 |
Date: October 31st, 2025 9:12 PM Author: Abusive aphrodisiac toaster rigpig
Yeah Locke is saying kinghood isn't something you can just inherit from Adam. That's what these kings were claiming. They said "Adam was an absolute monarch, and so were Adam's sons, and I can trace my lineage to one of Adam's sons."
Locke was saying hey look at King Fucking David. By the time he became King, he had all kinds of IRL achievements under his belt. He never said "I inherited this from God." So I don't think Locke's reading is orthogonal to yours at all.
Locke also psychoanalyzes God a bit. He says that at the time God was giving Adam "dominion" over certain things, he was pissed off and cursing Adam out, if anything. God certainly wasn't in the mood to do Adam any favors.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5792139&forum_id=2#49391785) |
|
|