The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
What's next for Milo?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 21st, 2017 7:43 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease No more Breitbart. I assume he will no longer be invited to speak on college campuses because no Republican group (the only groups to invite him) will want to associate with him.
Remember that many college Republican groups publicly denounced Trump. They seem cucky to me.
I think his comments were disgusting but he does bring a valuable voice to the table on many issues.
So, what's next? Going out on his own? |
 |
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:05 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal yeah, no doubt which comments exactly are you referring to? |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:06 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease Don't be obtuse.
Answer the question or get out of the thread, thanks. |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:24 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal so you don't have any specific comments, right? come on, ace, quit being a putz and back it up |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:26 PM Author: Cerise trip trust fund come on bro there's exactly one set of comments that Milo made that everyone is talking about today, don't play dumb
do you think he's right about the potential benefits of man-boy love? |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:27 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal no, i want you to commit to specific comments he made. we aren't going to play move the goalposts, straw man, or any of that shit. too many people don't have a fucking clue what he said and are projecting.
|
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:29 PM Author: Cerise trip trust fund Milo: "This is a controversial point of view I accept. We get hung up on this kind of child abuse stuff to the point where we’re heavily policing even relationships between consenting adults, you know grad students and professors at universities."
The men in the joint video interview then discuss Milo’s experience at age 14.
Another man says: "The whole consent thing for me. It’s not this black and white thing that people try to paint it. Are there some 13-year-olds out there capable of giving informed consent to have sex with an adult, probably..."
The man says, “The reason these age of consent laws exist is because we have to set some kind of a barometer here, we’ve got to pick some kind of an age…”
Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -”
It sounds like Catholic priest molestation to me, another man says, interrupting Milo.
Milo: “And you know what, I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good head if it wasn’t for him.”
Other people talk. Oh my God, I can’t handle it, one man says. The next thing in line is going to be pedophilia…says another man.
Milo: “You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.”
Another man said, “You are advocating for cross generational relationships here, can we be honest about that?”
Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys. They can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.” |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:31 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal so you disagree with all of that? bet not parse it and select the comments you disagree with |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:35 PM Author: Cerise trip trust fund i disagree with the claim that *any* 13 year olds are capable of giving informed consent to sex with an adult
i disagree with the claim that the subtleties and gray areas involved in dividing real-life sexual encounters into consensual/non-consensual are enough to justify any of the shit he's talking about
i agree that you can distinguish between "pedophilia" and "ephebophilia" but i condemn acting on them both anyway, and he very obviously is endorsing "pedophilia" by the common-language use of the term rather than the restricted definition that for some reason only "ephebophiles" seem to care about aside from people involved in the treatment of sex offenders who find it useful to make the distinction
i condemn the suggestion that mentoring at-risk young might justifiably involve having any sort of sexual relationship with them
|
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:46 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal are any 13 year olds capable of giving informed consent (as you put it) with another 13 year old? or are you just picking adult (18 year olds) or something else? you're going to have to specify what you are referring to in the second paragraph because i don't see it in his comments you quoted. can you intentionally try to misquote and misstate him anymore than you are in the 3rd paragraph? of course you can distinguish between them. and he did. clearly. unambiguously. don't resort to 'common-language' use when that's not what he meant. that's just being lazy and disingenuous. the 4th paragraph. he acknowledges that the law should be what it is. to state that at-risk youth can reap benefits from adults who break the law is almost certainly a fact. you actually think he doesn't know what he's talking about? that there is zero chance these types of relationships can benefit the younger person? that's a stupid conclusion. of course, these types of relationships have the potential to cause great harm, as well. no one in this conversation is suggesting the law should be changed. so are you really disagreeing with him?
|
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:30 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease That guy is a moron, don't engage him. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672639) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:30 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal what a fucking pussy thing to say, ace (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672647) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:36 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease I don't waste my time with idiots, sorry.
You've gotten this exchange alone from me, so you should be happy. |
Date: February 21st, 2017 7:59 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease No one has any thoughts? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672363) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:01 PM Author: milky filthpig Him and Anderson Cooper do a porn called Pooper 360. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672375) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:27 PM Author: racy deer antler orchestra pit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672608) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:34 PM Author: demanding multi-colored bbw set (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672680) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:03 PM Author: translucent ladyboy tattoo suicide (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672383) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:06 PM Author: coral irate weed whacker He's an unemployed non citizen with admitted criminal tendencies
CHOO CHOO |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:06 PM Author: Glittery nowag port authority bathroom (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672409) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:07 PM Author: wonderful shimmering corner Will change his views to gain acceptance with shitlibs because he prizes attention above all else. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672413) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:09 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease Let's hope this is not the case.
I'm really interested to see if there's an endgame to fighting shitlibs that goes beyond Breitbart. Cucks don't count. |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:20 PM Author: Filthy locus cuckold Paralegal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672530) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:23 PM Author: Sienna hairraiser travel guidebook depends if he can get his book published. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672567) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:25 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease Good point. Didn't it have a shitload of preorders? You'd have to think a good portion of those people still want the book.
But is publishing like a cartel with limited members? You may not find one willing to take the easy cash, because of the adverse publicity that will ensue. |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:26 PM Author: exciting greedy indian lodge sneaky criminal wanna bet? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672598) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:27 PM Author: impressive plum electric furnace Lol cartel... You can self publish on Amazon these days and sell a shit ton of copies. That's how most popular fantasy writers seem to get their start today (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672605) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:27 PM Author: Cerise trip trust fund i heard he's publishing it with Vox Day's publishing house (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672609) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:35 PM Author: Comical pistol mad cow disease Good. I actually read his book, which Milo wrote an introduction for.
Ironically it was about never backing down to SJWs, yet Milo did this by apologizing. |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:37 PM Author: contagious nubile point i'm with you. SJWs always lie is solid imho, but not much different than a week of XO. vox day could have copypasta'd chapters of it directly from XO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672703) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:28 PM Author: Purple aromatic piazza might be able to salvage career if book deal goes through and is successful otherwise the only way I see him being relevant ever again is if a "secret" sex tape is "leaked" |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:29 PM Author: contagious nubile point he's going to need to use his resources to make his own network as it were.
it's funny because at the end of the day, he is being vilified for letting the world in on "the family secret". no matter who you are, once you put your tribe on an island, there are repercussions. the irony being that his tribe wasn't his audience in first instance. if he were just in talking with his tribe, this would have been nbd. but here--writ large--is the danger of shunning the tribe in the first place; once you out the tribe AND alienate the external audience, you have nothing to fall back on. is how it is. self hating people would be wise to take a lesson from this. |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:33 PM Author: milky filthpig He'll come home. He'll start poasting again. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672665) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:33 PM Author: cerebral forum porn (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672671) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:38 PM Author: Buck-toothed pearl tanning salon sweet tailpipe artist (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672712) |
|
Date: February 21st, 2017 8:38 PM Author: boyish elastic band Lol at violent retard lawman8's obsession with media cycle horserace bullshit. I cannot fathom what kind of fucking loser you have to be to care SO MUCH about such inconsequential shit. "So, guys, what's next??" LMAO (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3532903&forum_id=2#32672713) |