This seems embarrassing enough where it might change people's minds.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49026616)

Don't get me wrong, both of them are utterly unsufferable assholes, but Tucker didn't "own" him there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49026621)

I think the point is that if you're a US Senator calling for the US to use its military to destroy and de-stabilize a country, you should probably know more about that country than the average xoxo poster.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49026634)

the important parts about iran have nothing to do with their population or their ethnic makeup

what are their seven largest cities?

what are their four main sources of income?

name three rivers in iran!

etc

go fuck yourself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49026647)

if you go way back to Eisenhower days, nothing happened unless a core group of experienced senators from both parties agreed to it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028114)

"Sasser doesn't come back to TN on the weekends to do town halls!" yada yada, Tennessee cucks say "yeah that's right I want my Senator here fucking my wife in the ass instead of actually doing his job!"

Sasser lost and the rest of the Senate sat up and took notice that Americans don't want skilled Senators. They want Senators who are back in their home states sucking dick from Thursday through Tuesday

all downhill from there, the amateurization of the Senate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49027853)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49029304)

Tucker is such a snivelling shit who is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is.

That said, obviously Israel should be destroyed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49027735)

Think about what's actually happening in this clip and how weird it would be that Jews would be particularly upset about it. Lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49027739)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49027766)

Instead, he literal knows nothing, LOL. This is what happens when you stake out your position based on AIPAC money and Mossad kompromat.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49027774)

the rest of this is drivel.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028164)

the bravery of being a pumo changing pumo in action.

Author: .....;;,,.........;.;.;.;.,;,;,;.;.;,;

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028829)

oh, no! screams the faggot pumo, he did threaten to kill him!

"President Donald Trump suggested he would only accept an "unconditional surrender" from Iran after making a threat to "kill" Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Trump made the threat in a Tuesday post on Truth Social.

"We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," the president insisted. "He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.""

this is simply trump keeping the option open. like he always does every time. like he should, btw.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028977)

go fuck yourself, loser

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49030625)

While Trump did not call for the ouster of the regime, or say that the U.S. would play any role in overthrowing the Iranian government, his words undercut what had appeared to be a coordinated message from his top advisers. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth each insisted Sunday that the U.S. was only interested in dismantling Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

“We don’t want to achieve regime change. We want to achieve the end of the Iranian nuclear program,” Vance told ABC. “That’s what the president set us out to do.”

vance is the one misspeaking here. trump is encouraging the current regime to focus on making iran better for iranians

i would say that trump is endorsing regime change if the current regime doesn't do better for iranians. very close to endorsing regime change, but not quite there

otoh, what does supporting regime change in iran mean? it's not like the country only has one person who hates the us in it. to be fair, it has fewer today than it did a few weeks ago.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49043607)

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1935382221533168062

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028787)

LJFL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028835)

*rolls film of Tucker denouncing gotcha journalism*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49028841)

If you don't know basic information about the population of a country, then you can't possibly advocate that it is in the US interest to topple their government.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49029009)

please

to your lame point, what basic information do you need to know?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49029123)

one can know basically nothing about a country, but know that regime change figures to be an improvement

note i did not say nothing

basically nothing includes durr durr population

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49030586)

Also Cruz: "Ok, Netanyahu misspoke in saying Iran tried to kill Trump twice."

LJL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5739572&forum_id=2#49029007)