The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is there a relevance to taking a COMPARATIVE LAW course?
| painfully honest ladyboy | 03/07/10 |
| concupiscible resort pervert | 03/07/10 |
| Aggressive generalized bond headpube | 03/07/10 |
| Flatulent curious center twinkling uncleanness | 03/07/10 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 7th, 2010 3:50 PM Author: painfully honest ladyboy Serious fucking question, I'm trying to figure out my 3L schedule.
Thanks fuckers! |
 |
Date: March 7th, 2010 5:32 PM Author: concupiscible resort pervert It's about as relevant as any other course you might take in law school. If you think you might enjoy the subject and/or like the prof, go for it.
I think doing a comparative law course could also be useful if you end up working at a big law firm, where you'll often work for international clients or on cross-border deals. The comparative law topics themselves won't be useful but it can be helpful to have the terminology/background/concepts down to understand what's going on or explain the US system to intl clients. |
Date: March 7th, 2010 4:44 PM Author: Aggressive generalized bond headpube A class on comparative commercial law can be relevant if you might end up working on international transactions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1243763&forum_id=2#14323535) |
|
Date: March 7th, 2010 5:26 PM Author: Flatulent curious center twinkling uncleanness Almost none. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1243763&forum_id=2#14324043) |