Us Sup Ct sides with straight woman in reverse discrimination case.
| Massive snowy resort | 06/05/25 | | sick address | 06/05/25 | | Massive snowy resort | 06/05/25 | | Razzle Roast Beef Ceo | 06/05/25 | | Grizzly contagious casino | 06/05/25 | | Massive snowy resort | 06/05/25 | | Domesticated Vengeful Parlor Fat Ankles | 06/05/25 | | Beta Tanning Salon | 06/05/25 | | tantric navy degenerate lay | 06/05/25 | | sick address | 06/05/25 | | Apoplectic cruise ship | 06/05/25 | | unhinged slimy abode | 06/05/25 | | tantric navy degenerate lay | 06/05/25 | | Citrine striped hyena | 06/05/25 | | Dull gay wizard | 06/05/25 | | sick address | 06/05/25 | | Apoplectic cruise ship | 06/05/25 | | Dull gay wizard | 06/05/25 | | Dull gay wizard | 06/05/25 | | sick address | 06/05/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 5th, 2025 10:36 AM Author: Grizzly contagious casino
Ooooooooh I'm a lawyer! Look at me I'm using all the right websites ooooooh!
fag!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733669&forum_id=2#48988722) |
Date: June 5th, 2025 10:38 AM Author: Dull gay wizard
this first sentence is poorly written, if not outright ambiguous or wrong:
"WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court agreed on June 5 that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733669&forum_id=2#48988732) |
Date: June 5th, 2025 2:36 PM Author: Dull gay wizard
Thomas footnote in his concurrence:
"The “‘background circumstances’” rule is nonsensical for an additional reason: It requires courts to assume that only an “‘unusual employer’” would discriminate against those it perceives to be in the majority. But, a number of this Nation’s largest and most prestigious employers have overtly discriminated against those they deem members of so-called majority groups. American employers have long been “obsessed” with “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives and affirmative action plans... Initiatives of this kind have often led to overt discrimination against those perceived to be in the majority."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5733669&forum_id=2#48989521) |
|
|