Anyone else find youtube Losers saying "hypergamous" gay and annoying
| motley state | 06/19/25 | | Metal rigor | 06/19/25 | | motley state | 06/20/25 | | comical faggotry | 06/20/25 | | comical faggotry | 06/20/25 | | ruddy brethren | 06/20/25 | | stimulating insecure temple | 06/20/25 | | bateful maniacal lettuce theater stage | 06/20/25 | | Offensive Underhanded Partner | 06/20/25 | | Heady wine foreskin | 06/20/25 | | Offensive Underhanded Partner | 06/20/25 | | Offensive Underhanded Partner | 06/20/25 | | Heady wine foreskin | 06/20/25 | | Offensive Underhanded Partner | 06/20/25 | | Heady wine foreskin | 06/20/25 | | copper startling principal's office international law enforcement agency | 06/20/25 | | motley state | 06/20/25 | | Magical Histrionic Cruise Ship | 06/20/25 | | motley state | 06/20/25 | | Magical Histrionic Cruise Ship | 06/20/25 | | motley state | 06/20/25 | | copper startling principal's office international law enforcement agency | 06/20/25 | | salmon stag film | 06/20/25 | | smoky location | 06/20/25 | | Contagious Immigrant | 06/20/25 | | motley state | 06/20/25 | | Opaque Vibrant Sandwich | 06/20/25 | | motley state | 06/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 19th, 2025 7:15 PM Author: motley state
First of all it's a term that biologists use and it's not vernacular. It's Loser-coded. Female evolutionary biologists with high GPAs probably don't know the term half the time.
Second of all, it's not even true a lot of the time. People just date people who are The Same as them basically. For example most bros here don't look at their BIL like, "wow, just wow. such hypergamy. He is my Better. His Genes are a cut above. I've accepted it."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740626&forum_id=2#49033281)
|
Date: June 20th, 2025 8:28 AM Author: copper startling principal's office international law enforcement agency
Isn’t Clique Theory based on Losers repurposing non-vernacular scientific terms like “phenotype?”
Just stating facts. Not trying to be a dick.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740626&forum_id=2#49034323) |
 |
Date: June 20th, 2025 9:23 AM Author: motley state
There’s a difference and it’s not subtle at all. Anyone who’s ever set foot in a high school has heard of Phenotype. Hypergamous is an esoteric term imo. No one will know it unless they google it or have Roissy explain it to them.
There are other reasons why it’s cringe. The way they all know to emphasize the “per” syllable. Idk you’d think they’d emphasize “hy”. But they’re all so ensconced in the red pill, they all know what to say
The other thing is that they just use it too much…. You’ll have Raymond grimacing and shaking his head, being like, “her hypergamy got the better of her!” Like using it as an adjective to describe an individual is just…. it makes him seem retarded and gay imo..
Also, the use of phenotype fills an important niche. People talk about “looks” and it’ll make you think you need to be Hot or fashionable or something. Autists will talk about height and forget that looks exist. Phenotype is a much better term in common parlance. It also covers dick size basically.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740626&forum_id=2#49034411) |
Date: June 20th, 2025 1:31 PM Author: Opaque Vibrant Sandwich
There are several types of man-o-sphere Losers and they're all annoying.
Least annoying are the PUAs. All they care about is getting laid, which is annoying, but only annoying in the way that s fat guy who can only talk about eating is annoying.
The MGTOW set would be OK if they would just GTOW already and not just talk about it.
The love-starved incels are pretty bad. Excessive preoccupation with women's preferences and desires is deeply irritating. Maybe it's true that women only want tall men with suitable canthal tilt, but Who Cares.
The traditionalists are the worst. If you want to subjugate women, just do it. Whining that women don't let you subjugate them is pathetic.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5740626&forum_id=2#49035061)
|
|
|